Anonymous wrote:If ACA is *that* bad, then why are a few Rs holding out and not wanting to repeal it without a replacement?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:.....also, to all you holier than thou liberals who think the lower-middle class isn't caring enough about providing free medical care to the poor (to their own detriment), would you be willing to sacrifice your OWN health care, and going "without," in order to give poor people what you had to give up? Because that is what has happened to many moderate earners.
I doubt you'd sacrifice your own health, skipping your needed treatments, so that the poor could get the treatments they need.
Now you're making shit up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm talking about an individual earning $50k whose kids are grown. There is no help for someone like that under the current ACA.
Blame the GOP who refused for 6 years to bring any patches or fixes to the ACA for vote. The dems have tried.
Or, blame the Dems who created such a crappy program. Remember Jonathan Gruber--the architect of the ACA? Counting on the fact that Americans are "stupid"?
No, blame the GOP. 6 years of being able to fix/improve it is a greater amount of time than the 1 year it took to create it.
No. Dems are responsible for the ACA. If I produce crappy product at my job, I can't absolve myself of responsibility by whining about how my coworkers won't help me fix it.
Really? What is your job, a burger flipper at McDonalds? That's not how it works in a team-oriented environment. GOP has had control for the last 6 years and has failed to fix anything.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:.....also, to all you holier than thou liberals who think the lower-middle class isn't caring enough about providing free medical care to the poor (to their own detriment), would you be willing to sacrifice your OWN health care, and going "without," in order to give poor people what you had to give up? Because that is what has happened to many moderate earners.
I doubt you'd sacrifice your own health, skipping your needed treatments, so that the poor could get the treatments they need.
Now you're making shit up.
Anonymous wrote:.....also, to all you holier than thou liberals who think the lower-middle class isn't caring enough about providing free medical care to the poor (to their own detriment), would you be willing to sacrifice your OWN health care, and going "without," in order to give poor people what you had to give up? Because that is what has happened to many moderate earners.
I doubt you'd sacrifice your own health, skipping your needed treatments, so that the poor could get the treatments they need.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm talking about an individual earning $50k whose kids are grown. There is no help for someone like that under the current ACA.
Blame the GOP who refused for 6 years to bring any patches or fixes to the ACA for vote. The dems have tried.
Or, blame the Dems who created such a crappy program. Remember Jonathan Gruber--the architect of the ACA? Counting on the fact that Americans are "stupid"?
No, blame the GOP. 6 years of being able to fix/improve it is a greater amount of time than the 1 year it took to create it.
No. Dems are responsible for the ACA. If I produce crappy product at my job, I can't absolve myself of responsibility by whining about how my coworkers won't help me fix it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Part of the problem is also the heavy subsidies. When people with low income can get better coverage for free than what is affordable to people on medium level income, the balance is wrong.
Bingo!
Poor people have it made in America!
Anonymous wrote:Part of the problem is also the heavy subsidies. When people with low income can get better coverage for free than what is affordable to people on medium level income, the balance is wrong.
Bingo!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm talking about an individual earning $50k whose kids are grown. There is no help for someone like that under the current ACA.
Blame the GOP who refused for 6 years to bring any patches or fixes to the ACA for vote. The dems have tried.
Or, blame the Dems who created such a crappy program. Remember Jonathan Gruber--the architect of the ACA? Counting on the fact that Americans are "stupid"?
No, blame the GOP. 6 years of being able to fix/improve it is a greater amount of time than the 1 year it took to create it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm talking about an individual earning $50k whose kids are grown. There is no help for someone like that under the current ACA.
Blame the GOP who refused for 6 years to bring any patches or fixes to the ACA for vote. The dems have tried.
Or, blame the Dems who created such a crappy program. Remember Jonathan Gruber--the architect of the ACA? Counting on the fact that Americans are "stupid"?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I'm talking about an individual earning $50k whose kids are grown. There is no help for someone like that under the current ACA.
Blame the GOP who refused for 6 years to bring any patches or fixes to the ACA for vote. The dems have tried.
Part of the problem is also the heavy subsidies. When people with low income can get better coverage for free than what is affordable to people on medium level income, the balance is wrong.