Maybe government should be viewed as a positive structure vs a problem or a solution.Anonymous wrote:Gingrich becoming Speaker in 1995. I worked in Congress before and after & 1995 is when everything became crazy demagoguery with no interest in even the basic requirements of functional government. It was the conclusion of three decades of Republican demagoguery, and after it worked, their party leaders continue to choose and frame policies based only on how well they incite anti-government anger.
Reagan did say that government was not the solution. That government was the problem.
Anonymous wrote:Not according to some liberals. They felt he wasn't combative enough in terms of gun control, immigration reform, etc . Who's trying to rewrite history here? No matter what Obama clearly had the best interests of the majority of Americans at heart. Not so today. Obama didn't add to dysfunction but he certainly tried to fix it ham handed so be it. The current administration, not so much.Anonymous wrote:2008: Obama was THE most liberal senator in the senate. Don't try to rewrite history.
Gingrich becoming Speaker in 1995. I worked in Congress before and after & 1995 is when everything became crazy demagoguery with no interest in even the basic requirements of functional government. It was the conclusion of three decades of Republican demagoguery, and after it worked, their party leaders continue to choose and frame policies based only on how well they incite anti-government anger.
So how do protect worker's rights in a global economy? Blue collar has changed from using your hands to pick vegetables or man a cash register to basically collecting data if you are trained to do so. And yet conservatives push back on minimum wage reform, public and further education. Let's take some of the $ out of the military industrial complex (not all just some) and figure out how to train in STEM sciences?Anonymous wrote:And were unions truly bad or rendered obsolete due to capitalism run amok?
Good question. There were definitely union corruption stories. But unions also hindered competition in a global economy. I think it was more of the latter than the former in hindsight. Unions had brought significant benefits to workers over the years.
Pensions went away and federal government came up with IRA and 401K accounts as the answer. It now turns out that this was a colossal failure for workers. Many will never retire or will retire in poverty.
Anecdotally, unions were seen as destroying the auto industry, making the Japanese and European cars seem more attractive than the Ford/GM models.
Of course, the afore mentioned oil shocks contributed to the desirability of more efficient cars, but the American companies missed the board completely in the late 1970's to mid 1980's. No, the Pacer didn't count as being efficient, particularly compared to the Golf or Civic.
Anonymous wrote:And were unions truly bad or rendered obsolete due to capitalism run amok?
And were unions truly bad or rendered obsolete due to capitalism run amok?
More progressive and less combative?Anonymous wrote:
I think some major changes started happening during Reagan's term. These were changes in how people viewed the economy . . . unions were suddenly "bad" and it seemed like we realized that globalism was inevitable. Nixon had already opened us up to China (and China was changing) and we had gone through the "oil crisis" under Carter. I believe the whole idea of IRA accounts started under Reagan . . . the idea that you would be saving for your own retirement and that pensions would be a thing of the past. The mindset of the American people began to change to one of less community and more individualism. I honestly think this has mentality has divided us more and more and helped cause the crash of 2008. People are now realizing that we either work together to solve problems or we divide ourselves.
Not according to some liberals. They felt he wasn't combative enough in terms of gun control, immigration reform, etc . Who's trying to rewrite history here? No matter what Obama clearly had the best interests of the majority of Americans at heart. Not so today. Obama didn't add to dysfunction but he certainly tried to fix it ham handed so be it. The current administration, not so much.Anonymous wrote:2008: Obama was THE most liberal senator in the senate. Don't try to rewrite history.