Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd consider OP Unitarian and possibly a Christian, depending on how she sees herself, although certainly not Evangelical and closer to Episcopal.
I think this as well although the Unitarian church doesn't always follow Christian teaching does it?
Back to the Talmud post that says most of Jesus's teachings were from Judaism, what teachings of Jesus are taught by many religions and not just Christianity? What of those are espoused by Unitarians?
Anonymous wrote:
Jesus exists as an historical being. He is most definitely a part of our social consciousness. We all know of him. He is as real to humanity as the Vikings or Henry the VIII. Fighting about proof is silly. Pure silly.
Are we capable of having a conversation that centers on OP's question? It's an interesting one, worthy of examination. If you don't believe in his divinity, what do you make of his (alleged, sigh) moral teachings? Atheists, your voices are probably most interesting here if you choose to focus on the question. Do you respond in any way to those stories, alter them, accept them while ignoring the source? Do you find conflict within yourselves because they make sense to you when the rest of it you refute?
DCUM is a community of highly-educated folks. Does it take a Bobcat to bring us together?
This could be such a cool conversation about moral guidance outside of dogma. Instead, it's just more hubris and bullshit citation whining. WHY? Is it so threatening to respond as a Christian or non-Christian about your thoughts or how you locate your morality?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'd consider OP Unitarian and possibly a Christian, depending on how she sees herself, although certainly not Evangelical and closer to Episcopal.
I think this as well although the Unitarian church doesn't always follow Christian teaching does it?
Back to the Talmud post that says most of Jesus's teachings were from Judaism, what teachings of Jesus are taught by many religions and not just Christianity? What of those are espoused by Unitarians?
Anonymous wrote:There is a significant mystical element to Christian & Catholic metaphysics (like the metaphysics of many other religions) which is irreducible to logical analysis.
Unquestioning belief in an abstraction--"the divinity of Christ"--does that make you a "Christian" if you are simply parroting the words of authority figures but do not have a spirtiual, intuitive understanding of what it means?
The Bible is filled with parables about people struggling with belief, and to believe. What do those parables mean? Where do you fit in?
Only a fool or child blindly believes in anything, without constantly questioning that belief.
Where you believe Jesus to have been divine is entirely a personal matter for your conscience. If that belief on your part, whatever it is, should cause someone else to label you "Christian" or "NOT Christian" is meaningless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you notice it's a beautiful day? You should get outside. And.....for when you get back....you copy & pasted the whole article. What were these specific "great points" you mentioned? Somewhere between the bullying and personal attacks on Lataster?
I think it's against the rules to copy a whole article
Ask Jeff to delete that post.
What the hell is wrong with you people. You don't agree with an excerpted article, you aren't capable of arguing against it, so you run to the moderator to ask him to delete it?
Uh no....asking to delete if PP posted most of an article (against Jeff's rules) instead of just pulling out relevant points.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you notice it's a beautiful day? You should get outside. And.....for when you get back....you copy & pasted the whole article. What were these specific "great points" you mentioned? Somewhere between the bullying and personal attacks on Lataster?
I think it's against the rules to copy a whole article
Ask Jeff to delete that post.
What the hell is wrong with you people. You don't agree with an excerpted article, you aren't capable of arguing against it, so you run to the moderator to ask him to delete it?
Anonymous wrote:There is a significant mystical element to Christian & Catholic metaphysics (like the metaphysics of many other religions) which is irreducible to logical analysis.
Unquestioning belief in an abstraction--"the divinity of Christ"--does that make you a "Christian" if you are simply parroting the words of authority figures but do not have a spirtiual, intuitive understanding of what it means?
The Bible is filled with parables about people struggling with belief, and to believe. What do those parables mean? Where do you fit in?
Only a fool or child blindly believes in anything, without constantly questioning that belief.
Where you believe Jesus to have been divine is entirely a personal matter for your conscience. If that belief on your part, whatever it is, should cause someone else to label you "Christian" or "NOT Christian" is meaningless.
Anonymous wrote:I'd consider OP Unitarian and possibly a Christian, depending on how she sees herself, although certainly not Evangelical and closer to Episcopal.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Did you notice it's a beautiful day? You should get outside. And.....for when you get back....you copy & pasted the whole article. What were these specific "great points" you mentioned? Somewhere between the bullying and personal attacks on Lataster?
I think it's against the rules to copy a whole article
Ask Jeff to delete that post.
Anonymous wrote:
Jesus exists as an historical being. He is most definitely a part of our social consciousness. We all know of him. He is as real to humanity as the Vikings or Henry the VIII. Fighting about proof is silly. Pure silly.
Are we capable of having a conversation that centers on OP's question? It's an interesting one, worthy of examination. If you don't believe in his divinity, what do you make of his (alleged, sigh) moral teachings? Atheists, your voices are probably most interesting here if you choose to focus on the question. Do you respond in any way to those stories, alter them, accept them while ignoring the source? Do you find conflict within yourselves because they make sense to you when the rest of it you refute?
DCUM is a community of highly-educated folks. Does it take a Bobcat to bring us together?
This could be such a cool conversation about moral guidance outside of dogma. Instead, it's just more hubris and bullshit citation whining. WHY? Is it so threatening to respond as a Christian or non-Christian about your thoughts or how you locate your morality?