Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Abortion is murder. Women that have abortions are worse than rapists, pedophiles, and drug dealers. Disgusting monsters.

Meat is murder. Are you a vegetarian?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with letting each state decide whether abortion should be legal in their state?

because it's a fundamental, federal, constitutional right.

are you aware of the definition of "fundamental"?

Are you going to whip out your dictionary again?

that wasn't me, but apparently you think an abortion is a "fundamental" right. And you would be at odds with the meaning of the term "fundamental".

Control over your own body is a right. Abortion falls under that the same as prescription drugs, surgery, weight loss, etc. The government should no more be able to dictate whether you can end a pregnancy than it should be able to tell you if you can take Synthroid.

Does this mean you're against single-payer then?

You seem to be backing away from it being a "fundamental" right, btw. Did you come to realize what that means?

Anonymous wrote:Abortion is murder. Women that have abortions are worse than rapists, pedophiles, and drug dealers. Disgusting monsters.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:ya know, this doesn't really bother me all that much

at its heart abortion is the taking of an inconvenient human life

of course the majority of women getting abortions are por and/or minorities that can't afford kids and UMC white women who don't want the winery trips to stop

I'm an UMC white woman who had a huge whoops pregnancy when my husband's vasectomy spontaneously failed after over 3 years. We kept the baby and are very happy with the outcome but if the tubal ligation I had during delivery fails and I'm faced with ANOTHER surprise pregnancy? Not so sure I could roll with the punches quite as easily. Stuff like this happens and women have the right to determine whether they are able or willing to add another human life to their plate. It's pregnancy and it's a lifetime of expense and care and worry. It is not something anyone should take lightly nor be forced to take on if their precautions don't work out. A surprise pregnancy can happen to anyone, even you. Birth control fails, condoms break, vasectomies repair themselves, etc. I, speaking as someone who has had one of these surprise pregnancies despite nearly failsafe birth control in place, appreciate that the option is there for people who need it.

If you think abortion is wrong, you don't have to get one. But how another woman chooses to handle a pregnancy is her business. Not yours.

Anonymous wrote:ya know, this doesn't really bother me all that much

at its heart abortion is the taking of an inconvenient human life

of course the majority of women getting abortions are por and/or minorities that can't afford kids and UMC white women who don't want the winery trips to stop

Anonymous wrote:ya know, this doesn't really bother me all that much

at its heart abortion is the taking of an inconvenient human life

of course the majority of women getting abortions are por and/or minorities that can't afford kids and UMC white women who don't want the winery trips to stop

Anonymous wrote:ya know, this doesn't really bother me all that much

at its heart abortion is the taking of an inconvenient human life

of course the majority of women getting abortions are por and/or minorities that can't afford kids and UMC white women who don't want the winery trips to stop

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with letting each state decide whether abortion should be legal in their state?

because it's a fundamental, federal, constitutional right.

are you aware of the definition of "fundamental"?

Are you going to whip out your dictionary again?

that wasn't me, but apparently you think an abortion is a "fundamental" right. And you would be at odds with the meaning of the term "fundamental".

Control over your own body is a right. Abortion falls under that the same as prescription drugs, surgery, weight loss, etc. The government should no more be able to dictate whether you can end a pregnancy than it should be able to tell you if you can take Synthroid.

Does this mean you're against single-payer then?

You seem to be backing away from it being a "fundamental" right, btw. Did you come to realize what that means?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with letting each state decide whether abortion should be legal in their state?

because it's a fundamental, federal, constitutional right.

are you aware of the definition of "fundamental"?

Are you going to whip out your dictionary again?

that wasn't me, but apparently you think an abortion is a "fundamental" right. And you would be at odds with the meaning of the term "fundamental".

Control over your own body is a right. Abortion falls under that the same as prescription drugs, surgery, weight loss, etc. The government should no more be able to dictate whether you can end a pregnancy than it should be able to tell you if you can take Synthroid.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If inside my body is less private than inside my house (where government can not search without a warrant), I don't know what is privacy anymore and where government intrusion can stop.

Killing is wrong... wherever you do it.

And there isn't universal agreement that abortion is killing. You anti-choicers are such hypocrites.

If you aren't "terminating" a life, what exactly are you terminating?

The pregnancy is terminated, genius

B-I-N-G-O!

Pregnancy (dictionary.com) defined as:
"Having a child or other offspring developing in the body"

Thank you, thank you, thank you, PP, for FINALLY admitting the TRUTH.

Case closed.

OMG! You finally got me! Of course, you are right! I realize the error my ways now. Thanks!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with letting each state decide whether abortion should be legal in their state?

because it's a fundamental, federal, constitutional right.

are you aware of the definition of "fundamental"?

Are you going to whip out your dictionary again?

that wasn't me, but apparently you think an abortion is a "fundamental" right. And you would be at odds with the meaning of the term "fundamental".

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with letting each state decide whether abortion should be legal in their state?

because it's a fundamental, federal, constitutional right.

are you aware of the definition of "fundamental"?

Are you going to whip out your dictionary again?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with letting each state decide whether abortion should be legal in their state?

because it's a fundamental, federal, constitutional right.

are you aware of the definition of "fundamental"?