Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCI is having a problem attracting the strongest students from our feeder. The better speakers of the language of instruction in my child's 5th grade class, as well as the strongest math and English students, didn't make the jump. They went to BASIS, Latin, Deal the burbs and privates. Wish it weren't so.
Which feeder? And what percentage of the class opted out?
I know of a few YY students who left. Two were strong students. Two were weak and good riddances. On balance it stays the same.
YY lost 8- 12between 3rd and 5th.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That sounds terrible. Why are you sticking it out at this feeder? Because the immersion instruction is strong, and very important to you? One hears about rowdy kids at DCI, but not on an epic scale. [/quote
I have not heard about rowdy kids at DCI. I've heard about rowdy kids at Wilson and Coolidge.
I have.
Me too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That sounds terrible. Why are you sticking it out at this feeder? Because the immersion instruction is strong, and very important to you? One hears about rowdy kids at DCI, but not on an epic scale. [/quote
I have not heard about rowdy kids at DCI. I've heard about rowdy kids at Wilson and Coolidge.
I have.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DCI is having a problem attracting the strongest students from our feeder. The better speakers of the language of instruction in my child's 5th grade class, as well as the strongest math and English students, didn't make the jump. They went to BASIS, Latin, Deal the burbs and privates. Wish it weren't so.
Which feeder? And what percentage of the class opted out?
I know of a few YY students who left. Two were strong students. Two were weak and good riddances. On balance it stays the same.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That sounds terrible. Why are you sticking it out at this feeder? Because the immersion instruction is strong, and very important to you? One hears about rowdy kids at DCI, but not on an epic scale.
At this point, the issue comes down to whether it is worth it to stay to send the children to DCI or if that will just be more of the same. The feeder does not seem to think that this is an issue.
Anonymous wrote:That sounds terrible. Why are you sticking it out at this feeder? Because the immersion instruction is strong, and very important to you? One hears about rowdy kids at DCI, but not on an epic scale. [/quote
I have not heard about rowdy kids at DCI. I've heard about rowdy kids at Wilson and Coolidge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That sounds terrible. Why are you sticking it out at this feeder? Because the immersion instruction is strong, and very important to you? One hears about rowdy kids at DCI, but not on an epic scale.
At this point, the issue comes down to whether it is worth it to stay to send the children to DCI or if that will just be more of the same. The feeder does not seem to think that this is an issue.
Anonymous wrote:That sounds terrible. Why are you sticking it out at this feeder? Because the immersion instruction is strong, and very important to you? One hears about rowdy kids at DCI, but not on an epic scale.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a feeder. Although it was great when the kids were young, it seems more and more like they are ignoring the needs of children who are not outright failing.
Not all feeders seem to be created equal...
My concern is that this is a feeder that is considered good. If the good feeders aren't ensuring the needs of successful students aren't being met, how can DCI? Moreover, is DCI actually trying? I'm not trolling. I desperately want to know the answer to these questions before we make serious decisions.
Please define the "needs of successful students." PARRC scores of 4s and 5s for both reading and math across the board? Fluency in the target language by 5th grade?
Put your faith in DCI for the education of an academically advanced or fully bilingual student (in English and one of the DCI target languages) and don't be surprised if the joke is on your family eventually. Why trust a public charter board blithely ignoring the academic literature on what works in language immersion studies for young people? The leadership won't even allow native speakers FARMs students to test in to replace dropouts at this city's ES immersion charters, a basic concession to both fairness and best educational practices.
I want to know how they get away with it year after year, using hundreds of millions in tax payers money to support one-way immersion by design. Somebody's about to post, it's all Congress' fault, for the way they wrote federal charter law. Total BS.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a feeder. Although it was great when the kids were young, it seems more and more like they are ignoring the needs of children who are not outright failing.
Not all feeders seem to be created equal...
My concern is that this is a feeder that is considered good. If the good feeders aren't ensuring the needs of successful students aren't being met, how can DCI? Moreover, is DCI actually trying? I'm not trolling. I desperately want to know the answer to these questions before we make serious decisions.
Please define the "needs of successful students." PARRC scores of 4s and 5s for both reading and math across the board? Fluency in the target language by 5th grade?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a feeder. Although it was great when the kids were young, it seems more and more like they are ignoring the needs of children who are not outright failing.
Not all feeders seem to be created equal...
My concern is that this is a feeder that is considered good. If the good feeders aren't ensuring the needs of successful students aren't being met, how can DCI? Moreover, is DCI actually trying? I'm not trolling. I desperately want to know the answer to these questions before we make serious decisions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We are at a feeder. Although it was great when the kids were young, it seems more and more like they are ignoring the needs of children who are not outright failing.
Not all feeders seem to be created equal...