Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hillary and Michelle took their husbands' last names, none of you have an excuse and are not important. suck it.
??? It's not an excuse.
Also, I don't make my decisions based upon what politicians do. If I did, then I would be okay with DH having affairs. But go ahead, live your life based upon what celebrities do. I'll pass.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hillary and Michelle took their husbands' last names, none of you have an excuse and are not important. suck it.
Don't know about Michelle, but Hillary did not want to, only did it out of political necessity so Bill could be elected in Arkansas.
Anonymous wrote:Hillary and Michelle took their husbands' last names, none of you have an excuse and are not important. suck it.
Anonymous wrote:Hillary and Michelle took their husbands' last names, none of you have an excuse and are not important. suck it.
Anonymous wrote:If you don't take his last name, he shouldn't have to wear a wedding ring.
Anonymous wrote:If you don't take his last name, he shouldn't have to wear a wedding ring.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wanted us to all have the same last name. My husband would have considered taking mine if I'd asked him to.
I grew up with divorced parents and my mom remarried and I lived with them so they were all a family and I had a different last name. It always made me feel just the tiniest bit like an outsider. I a) didn't want to feel that twinge in the family I was building with my husband and b) didn't want my kids to feel it either.
Honestly its NBD. I am a VERY strong, opinionated, female supporting woman (and an atheist democrat in case people think its just conservative thing). Some people would say obnoxiously so but this felt like a silly hill to die on. It is not viewed as succumbing to the patriarchy in today's society, be real. I felt a little sad as my wedding approached and I knew my time as a 'Smith' was coming to an end but six months later it was whatever. Your last name is not your defining characteristic.
If you want to keep it, keep it. If you want to change it, change it. Neither choice defines you as a 'better' or 'more independent' or 'stronger' woman.
You can rationalize it all you want, but there are a million "little" ways that our society confers second-class status on women, and this is one. Is it worth wailing in the streets about, no, but please don't delude yourself that it doesn't.
I love being a woman. I'm married to a great man and he's promised to provide for me my entire life. The very least I can do is take his name. It's well well worth it. I could keep my name and be a single mom but that would be so much harder.
I love being a woman too. I also love my husband.
Lucky for me, he also loves me for me and didn't ask me to change myself as a condition of marriage.
Mine didn't require it either. But I promise your husband took note of your decision. You expect for him to hold up his end of the bargain but you decided you don't have to hold up yours. He knows this.
Anonymous wrote:Changing my name in no way changed WHO I was- what an odd idea. I simply switched my name from my fathers last name to my husband and children's name. We are a family.
Strange that your fathers name actually defines you.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes unless you want to have to explain every pickup
Nope. Never been a problem.