Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't be a fan of sharing long term with high school and other unknown entities but it's a beautiful building, closer to metro, and better than some of the other options that were floating around.
Come on DCUM, surely you can do better than this? You must have more petty ways to rain on our parade than this. I mean a beautiful, historic building that's near Metro, near the current location and has beautiful green space and plenty of room can't be perfect, there must be DCUM complaints to put those "mean" Lee moms in their place.
Sure, I'll help! It's a beautiful building, but will probably need a ton of work since it's been sitting vacant for a couple of years. Of course there will be safety concerns since it will be an open campus with a reform school onsite, and they will need to expand so quickly to afford the place that the educational model will probably suffer.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's on 4th st, close to the current location, near CU in Brookland.
No, in Edgewood. Please don't buy into realtor hype by calling everything Brookland.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Elementry kids sharing space with high school kids?
And wasn't leadership academy aimed at problem kids?
They won't be sharing space. Completely separate.
How seperate? Seperate buildings? No 17 year olds hanging out after school on campus? Can you explain more?
I am not worried about high school kids around elementary school kids. I think middle school kids would have more of an interest in elementary school kids (and visa versa), but I don't see teenagers having any interest in interacting with little kids. The problem with the educational campuses was the middle school kids. Combine elementary and high school, and you're fine.
Anonymous wrote:does anyone know anything about democracy prep, which opened this fall? Seems like we'll have a lot of those students. The one in NY sounded terrible (a mean kipp with bad test scores) but it might be different here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Elementry kids sharing space with high school kids?
And wasn't leadership academy aimed at problem kids?
They won't be sharing space. Completely separate.
How seperate? Seperate buildings? No 17 year olds hanging out after school on campus? Can you explain more?
I am not worried about high school kids around elementary school kids. I think middle school kids would have more of an interest in elementary school kids (and visa versa), but I don't see teenagers having any interest in interacting with little kids. The problem with the educational campuses was the middle school kids. Combine elementary and high school, and you're fine.
It's the mission of WLA - it's not "high school kids" this isnt Banneker, the mission of the school is "disenfranchised" kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Elementry kids sharing space with high school kids?
And wasn't leadership academy aimed at problem kids?
They won't be sharing space. Completely separate.
How seperate? Seperate buildings? No 17 year olds hanging out after school on campus? Can you explain more?
The charter is for a dorm/boarding school
That portion of the charter was denied.
Because CHPSPO said NIMBY regarding this school. They caught DCBCSB for a year to keep this school off the Hill.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Elementry kids sharing space with high school kids?
And wasn't leadership academy aimed at problem kids?
They won't be sharing space. Completely separate.
How seperate? Seperate buildings? No 17 year olds hanging out after school on campus? Can you explain more?
The charter is for a dorm/boarding school
That portion of the charter was denied.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Elementry kids sharing space with high school kids?
And wasn't leadership academy aimed at problem kids?
They won't be sharing space. Completely separate.
How seperate? Seperate buildings? No 17 year olds hanging out after school on campus? Can you explain more?
The charter is for a dorm/boarding school
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Elementry kids sharing space with high school kids?
And wasn't leadership academy aimed at problem kids?
They won't be sharing space. Completely separate.
How seperate? Seperate buildings? No 17 year olds hanging out after school on campus? Can you explain more?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Elementry kids sharing space with high school kids?
And wasn't leadership academy aimed at problem kids?
They won't be sharing space. Completely separate.
How seperate? Seperate buildings? No 17 year olds hanging out after school on campus? Can you explain more?
I am not worried about high school kids around elementary school kids. I think middle school kids would have more of an interest in elementary school kids (and visa versa), but I don't see teenagers having any interest in interacting with little kids. The problem with the educational campuses was the middle school kids. Combine elementary and high school, and you're fine.
Anonymous wrote:I'm just surprised about WLA because I thought their charter application had been all about serving Wards 7 and 8.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So Elementry kids sharing space with high school kids?
And wasn't leadership academy aimed at problem kids?
They won't be sharing space. Completely separate.
How seperate? Seperate buildings? No 17 year olds hanging out after school on campus? Can you explain more?