Anonymous wrote:One could easily say that the responses reflect the notion that there can only be one "right" school for each child. I don't find it a stretch to believe some boys would do well at either school and, perish the thought, some parents might be interested in what school might be best for their child. Or is it a case of sporty Catholic boys need not apply to Sidwell because it is obviously the wrong school for them, regardless of their academic abilities?
Anonymous wrote:I still don't get why people are so incensed if a non Catholic prefers Prep to Sidwell or any other school. Yes, Sidwell is extremely selective in admissions, has a wonderful academic program, generates lots of NMSF and Ivy admissions and does many other things well. I know my son is a Sr. For a certain type of kid it is a great school. For another type of kids who loves really competitive team sports, wants to learn but only do two or so hours of home work a night and loves the comfortable easy going nature of some boys' school, Prep is great. I have had close relatives there and its a nice school with nice parents and about 25 percent non-Catholic now days. it does not have the stress level of Sidwell and that is just plain better for some kids. So let people go where their kid fits best. Why are people on this thread so judgmental about decisions that have no effects on them?
Anonymous wrote:http://connectedcommunities.us/showthread.php?t=72291
No national merit semi finalists from GP, Landon, Bullis. One from Heights. MoCo publics an excellent showing.
Same list for DC has 3 GDS, 3 Maret, 4 NCS, 16 from Sidwell, 6 from STA, 4 St Johns
Same list on the Fairfax County side showed a ridiculous number for Thomas Jefferson HS showed over 160. Not a typo.
At least in terms of National Merit Scholar Semifinalists, this is a pretty objective measure in favor of Sidwell and then STA and St Johns. Horrendous for the MoCo preps. Very impressive for some of the MoCo publics, and a surprise to me by the count. Thomas Jefferson -- well, WOW.
Anonymous wrote:"While it may be a valid measure, that does not mean it is objective; rather, it may only suggest that Sidwell/STA place a greater emphasis on test scores in the admissions process. Good scores for entry likely support good NMSF rates down the road. Certainly that is the case with TJ. Again, this is not criticism of any of the schools, there is certainly nothing wrong with great NMSF."
Isn't that a little like saying, Sidwell may be just as good at sports as GP but GP places a greater emphasis on athleticism in the admissions process? I guess I don't follow your logic.
Anonymous wrote:Are NMSF assigned based on geography?
Anonymous wrote:Are NMSF assigned based on geography?