Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, we spank. It works for our family. It's they calm, measured soanking. Never in anger.
Oh, measured and controlled hitting? Got it. Do you teach them they can hit others, as long as they aren't angry?
Nope, just like I don't teach them it's okay to take away others toys away, put others in time out, send others to bed early, or away others' desserts.
This. People make the same stupid arguments, and never think for half a second that they're arguing against the concept of discipline altogether.
Discipline is teaching. Thinking that hitting is a bad way to teach doesn't mean that I am against teaching.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, we spank. It works for our family. It's they calm, measured soanking. Never in anger.
Oh, measured and controlled hitting? Got it. Do you teach them they can hit others, as long as they aren't angry?
Nope, just like I don't teach them it's okay to take away others toys away, put others in time out, send others to bed early, or away others' desserts.
This. People make the same stupid arguments, and never think for half a second that they're arguing against the concept of discipline altogether.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. Never. Might does not make right, and I see it as an abuse of power.
So you wouldn't use your physical strength to force a child into timeout, or into a car seat?
Anonymous wrote:I had the shit beaten out of me as a kid, and my boyfriend was spanked. I have four kids and have not spanked any of them. At first I didn't spank because I couldn't trust myself to stop at spanking and not kill them. Then I didn't spank them because I realized it wasn't needed.
I have smacked hands trying to sneak food. I have made the kids hit the back of their own hands. But I don't hit.
Anonymous wrote:No. Never. Might does not make right, and I see it as an abuse of power.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, we spank. It works for our family. It's they calm, measured soanking. Never in anger.
Oh, measured and controlled hitting? Got it. Do you teach them they can hit others, as long as they aren't angry?
Nope, just like I don't teach them it's okay to take away others toys away, put others in time out, send others to bed early, or away others' desserts.
This. People make the same stupid arguments, and never think for half a second that they're arguing against the concept of discipline altogether.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, we spank. It works for our family. It's they calm, measured soanking. Never in anger.
Oh, measured and controlled hitting? Got it. Do you teach them they can hit others, as long as they aren't angry?
Nope, just like I don't teach them it's okay to take away others toys away, put others in time out, send others to bed early, or away others' desserts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Like any consequence, the kids KNOW why they are being spanked, and we discuss the issue before and after the correction. Hugs, kisses, and reflection on how we can do better next time. "
Weird and creepy and pervy.
Np. This is what we do, too. Why do you think it's weird?
NP. I think it's weird too. It sounds cold and calculated. And you're teaching your kid that abuse is OK as long as the hitter gives you a hug and kiss later. Classic adult abuse situation, there.
Anonymous wrote:We do spank. Never out of anger, however. I think that's the key- like PP said, there are a few things that are an automatic spanking in our house. Like any consequence, the kids KNOW why they are being spanked, and we discuss the issue before and after the correction. Hugs, kisses, and reflection on how we can do better next time. And then it's done, and we move on. No different than other consequences.
I am not a fan of the impromptu whack on the butt stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, different punishments work on different children. Do what works for your child. There is no research that states that, in and of itself, a handful of spankings with an open hand in childhood negatively impacts a child.
A lot of adults have been spanked as kids with no lasting negative impact, and they manage to still have close, loving relationships with their parents. Some obviously have issues, but I suspect there may have been more things going on there to cause some emotional/mental issues down the line than simply a handful of spankings as a child.
There IS actually research that shows that spanking, with an open hand or otherwise, DOES, in fact, negatively impact the child. But, my assumption is that those of you that stank your kids are not making an informed, evidence-based decision based on what is best for your child.
Not research that controls for the type, frequency, severity of spanking, or controls for SES, or controls for the type of children predisposed to behavior more likely to earn soakings, etc.
Okay you obviously have not read the research that I have. Makes me wonder if you are just making this up. The study I read was longitudinal and included a range of spanking disciple and found that across the board, spanking had negative outcomes. Don't kid yourself that hitting them is good for them. It is not.
Do you care to share the article you read?
Here you go. Although I am done arguing this. If this is not self-evident, I doubt the research will persuade you.
http://www.endcorporalpunishment.org/assets/pdfs/reference-documents/Gershoff-US-report-2008.pdf