So, I see "public health" is the red herring of the day, haha.
Right now in elementary we have three basic tiers, LD, GE, AAP. That is not adequate to capture the range of abilities. In middle school the levels expand (ex. Honors). In high school there is even more differentiation and the ability for a student to personalize a schedule based on strengths and interests.
I would like to see broad differentiation filter down to elementary schools. Because Level II, III and local IV are not cutting it for many.
Anonymous wrote:Your kid with a very high IQ should not interfere with the pursuit of high performance by kids who have never measured their IQ, or even cared about IQ, but work and prep hard all the way to the top of the academic heap. This is a land of hard workers. At least this is what we are taught in American Studies. Our peoples have worked hard on the range, the farm , the classroom, at home, in prep parlors and on the athletic fields. Do you have a problem with this?
10:33. My position is that differentiation should cover the entire range of abilities from severe learning disabilities to exceptionally high abilities. I don't care if all labels of levels were stripped off (incl. AAP). Then those with exceptional abilities can have a smaller program like before and the next tier can have a specialized program and so on and so forth.
Like public health in the US do you expect the public schools in DC to provide this concierge education catered to a tier system of descending exceptional ability?
10:43, you seem to think that all kids are the same and that they can all learn in the same ways. Experience shows that children do not all learn in the same ways and they in fact can have very different needs. Public schools have not had a "one size fits all" model for a very long time; they instead try to meet the different learning needs of children by training teachers to work with different types of learners and setting up different classrooms so that children can be placed in the setting that is most appropriate for them.
Your kid with a very high IQ should not interfere with the pursuit of high performance by kids who have never measured their IQ, or even cared about IQ, but work and prep hard all the way to the top of the academic heap. This is a land of hard workers. At least this is what we are taught in American Studies. Our peoples have worked hard on the range, the farm , the classroom, at home, in prep parlors and on the athletic fields. Do you have a problem with this?
10:33. My position is that differentiation should cover the entire range of abilities from severe learning disabilities to exceptionally high abilities. I don't care if all labels of levels were stripped off (incl. AAP). Then those with exceptional abilities can have a smaller program like before and the next tier can have a specialized program and so on and so forth.
Your idiotic sarcasm aside, that's the issue. There are plenty of challenges ahead but she's not getting them in the current construct of the AAP program. Just like most parents I just want my kids to be challenged appropriately in school and keep the love of learning.
I want my DD in class with other kids like her because it's healthy for her to know there are other people like her and to have other kids challenge her. At the base school, she was the weird one when she was trying to discuss topics that aren't of interest to most of her peers. It's hard to see your kid come home many days saying that she knows she's weird and is being called names or ostracized because she's different.
For those of you who are so flippant about this subject, I wish you would realize that this is a real issue for some parents with kids that have a very high IQ. This is not about bragging. Simply because you think that illustrates how ignorant you are of the realities of kids and parents of kids like this. Somedays I really wish she was a little more "normal" like her sibling. Trust me life is a lot more rainbows and unicorns for these kids.
+1. I hate how we parents are expected to sit down and shut up because our children are exceptionally bright so everything should be simple and easy for them and us. It is not that way.Anonymous wrote:
Why is it that exceptionally less bright kids (and their parents) who work hard academically and perform at the highest levels never worry about all those self-professed kids that are exceptionally bright with the "highest" IQs?
I was reacting to the person who said pp's child should just skip up to MIT. They were suggesting that pp's concern for her child was unreasonable.
Anonymous wrote:Your kid with a very high IQ should not interfere with the pursuit of high performance by kids who have never measured their IQ, or even cared about IQ, but work and prep hard all the way to the top of the academic heap. This is a land of hard workers. At least this is what we are taught in American Studies. Our peoples have worked hard on the range, the farm , the classroom, at home, in prep parlors and on the athletic fields. Do you have a problem with this?
Why is it that exceptionally less bright kids (and their parents) who work hard academically and perform at the highest levels never worry about all those self-professed kids that are exceptionally bright with the "highest" IQs?
For those of you who are so flippant about this subject, I wish you would realize that this is a real issue for some parents with kids that have a very high IQ. This is not about bragging. Simply because you think that illustrates how ignorant you are of the realities of kids and parents of kids like this. Somedays I really wish she was a little more "normal" like her sibling. Trust me life is a lot more rainbows and unicorns for these kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:pp here - one teacher called DD an intrinsic learner. We don't have to provide any type of help or motivation for her to learn new concepts. DC taught herself to read, we provided books like every parent, but within about 2 weeks when she was 3 we noticed she started fluently reading bob books, so we gave her level 1 books and she goes through books like water. Read the magic treehouse series on her own accord the summer after K. Math is the same way.
The aap program is not challenging for her from what I can see. HW gets done in after school care and I look at it but there is rarely ever a problem wrong. I've tried to offer help to study for tests but she just says - we went over it in class so I'm good - and rarely gets a wrong answer on a test. She does a lot of "learning" on her own outside of school.
Why is it so hard to believe that she did so well on the tests but didn't test prep?
Sounds like DD is ready for MIT. No need for hard work and prep. There are no challenges remaining. Perhaps even MIT will not challenge her. What to do? Just keep prepping...read voraciously.
Your idiotic sarcasm aside, that's the issue. There are plenty of challenges ahead but she's not getting them in the current construct of the AAP program. Just like most parents I just want my kids to be challenged appropriately in school and keep the love of learning.
I want my DD in class with other kids like her because it's healthy for her to know there are other people like her and to have other kids challenge her. At the base school, she was the weird one when she was trying to discuss topics that aren't of interest to most of her peers. It's hard to see your kid come home many days saying that she knows she's weird and is being called names or ostracized because she's different.
For those of you who are so flippant about this subject, I wish you would realize that this is a real issue for some parents with kids that have a very high IQ. This is not about bragging. Simply because you think that illustrates how ignorant you are of the realities of kids and parents of kids like this. Somedays I really wish she was a little more "normal" like her sibling. Trust me life is a lot more rainbows and unicorns for these kids.