Anonymous wrote:My white sister was accepted to Ellington in the 80s. That being said, I find it strange that any school should be describe serving a certain race as ita vision. I can understand serving an interest ( the arts, tech), or a type of learner (struggling, gifted) - but race? That language kind of makes me sick to my stomach. I dont like the idea of academies just for AA boys either.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The mission of the school, in its founding documents, is to serve students of color who have talent in the arts; white kids can attend if they have talent in order to supplement the arts purpose.
Proof of this please. I've been searching online and ha e not found any support for this claim.
Anonymous wrote:The mission of the school, in its founding documents, is to serve students of color who have talent in the arts; white kids can attend if they have talent in order to supplement the arts purpose.
Anonymous wrote:But the demographics of the city are changing, so it makes sense that the demographics of the school might also start changing. I would hope that Ellington and Banneker would be welcoming to all students even if that means adapting their traditional role.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it's sickening that we're spending so much on Ellington when so many other schools are in need.
We should do our bread and butter before creating this palace for the arts.
Also, Ellington should increase the tuition from out-of-state students to cover their portion of the renovation (and actually collect it!). Why should we pay for them?
I think a performing high school is important. But I agree, I don't see why DC shouod then be subsidizing PG kids to go there.
Anonymous wrote:Seems like the Wilson PTA should argue point blank they need the money morethan Ellington.
Anonymous wrote:Seems like the Wilson PTA should argue point blank they need the money morethan Ellington.