Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a SWS parent who works outside the home I have to admit that I rely a lot on the stay at home parents - to tell me what is going on in the classroom and at the school more broadly, to send me pictures of field trips, to generally help me feel connected. There have certainly been times when I've felt a pang of something (guilt, jealousy, I don't know) that I can't volunteer on the same level. But talking to other friends who work, they have the same pangs occasionally.
Another SWS WOHM, and I agree with this. The super-involved SAH parents (not just moms, but mostly) do all seem to know each other better and hang out together. But they are perfectly friendly if you sidle up next to them on the playground or at meetings or whatever. To the SWS PP who feels left out: I strongly encourage reaching out, if befriending other parents is important to you. Go to the auction, to some of the game nights or whatever, hang out after pickup on the playground. Chat with the parents who you think of as "cliqueish." Or, even better, with the other parents you see who also don't seem to know everyone!
SWS does seem to have an extraordinarily high ratio of SAH or very part-time-employed parents. I just looked at my daughter's class list and, yes, 11 out of the 22 kids in her class have a SAH parent. (It's lower for my older kid's class.) That certainly affects the feeling of the school and probably makes working moms feel less comfortable. But our kids' school is made a better place by all the hours volunteered by those SAH parents so I try to remind myself to feel grateful rather than jealous or left out.
Anonymous wrote:This is new this year correct? Because I know it hasn't worked that way in the past. When we got into a higher ranked school we got calls of Waitlists by schools ranked lower well into the summer. You get the boot off the WL if it's your initial lottery match, but once the WLs left central I though they were all worked individually by the various schools? Happy to hear if that's the way it's being managed now, much more equitable.
Anonymous wrote:As a SWS parent who works outside the home I have to admit that I rely a lot on the stay at home parents - to tell me what is going on in the classroom and at the school more broadly, to send me pictures of field trips, to generally help me feel connected. There have certainly been times when I've felt a pang of something (guilt, jealousy, I don't know) that I can't volunteer on the same level. But talking to other friends who work, they have the same pangs occasionally.
Anonymous wrote:On the cliques: But the principal is somewhat unusual in that he delegates practically all decisions to his staff or, more likely, the LSAT (an elected group of popular parents). So if you have an issue with something happening in your child's classroom, you can email the principal about it but he probably will delegate it to the LSAT.
I haven't found this to be true about the principal (that he delegates classroom concerns to the LSAT), but SWS began as a teacher led program. Teachers still have far more input on the direction of the school then at least the other 3 schools I've been with different kids.
Anonymous wrote:That's how it SHOULD work, but don't the individual schools manage the wait lists still? So, how would SWS know the #4 WL student enrolled at a school his parents ranked off of higher if he got off another wait list? IS there central management of some sort?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our WL numbers moved from 110 to 108 for PK3. This may mean that two spots were offered off of the list...good luck for those with good numbers!
no -- it just means that two people ahead of you enrolled somewhere (not necessarily SWS) and are no longer on the list
Hence the "may mean"
Our waitlist number is in the 40s and has only improved by 1. So odds are good that at least one of those two spots PP moved was just someone who enrolled elsewhere.
Forgive my ignorance - I thought you remain on waitlists even if you enroll elsewhere. Is this not the case?

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our WL numbers moved from 110 to 108 for PK3. This may mean that two spots were offered off of the list...good luck for those with good numbers!
no -- it just means that two people ahead of you enrolled somewhere (not necessarily SWS) and are no longer on the list
Hence the "may mean"
Our waitlist number is in the 40s and has only improved by 1. So odds are good that at least one of those two spots PP moved was just someone who enrolled elsewhere.
Anonymous wrote:Anyone know if the wait list has moved, or expected to move for 1st? Our number hasn't changed but I know its not always current.