Anonymous wrote:A lot of them claim to be "married" to their best friends. It's not sexual.
As for listing themselves as bisexual I think that's simply a combination of sexuality being fluid for many (most?) people, and society being more open-minded about same sex relationships these days.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Polygamy is with consenting adults
Incest can also be with consenting adults
What if your 19yr old daughter and husband wanted a sexual relationship? Consenting adults. Decided to fight for the right to get married. They are in love. They can't help who they fall in love with. Is it wrong?
What if one man and 4 women all want to get married in DC and fight to have equal rights. Is it wrong?
There is no difference.
Shorter PP: I oppose legal marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women because I oppose incestuous marriage and polygamy.
Not a very logical argument.
Actually it truly is. Can you explain how it is not?
Because marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women is neither incestuous nor polygamy.
It's like saying, "I don't like pepperoni pizza because I don't like anchovies or black olives."
That is not the point. Gays/lesbians were once considered taboo and are now fighting and receiving equal rights. Transgendered are on their role. So why not polygamy? Also considered taboo, also unrelated. Why can't they fight for their rights? Why can't a father/daughter? Cousins can in some states. Why not other family members?
No difference. Just perception.
Anonymous wrote:Girls have learned they will get more attention from boys if they feign bi-sexual interests. It's amazing how long a guy can be strung along hoping his so called bisexual girlfriend will invite him into a threesome.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I asked my 17 yo DC about this after hearing her friends call each other "wives" yet almost all of them have boyfriends. Her exact words " I blame glee ..its teaching all girls to be lesbians and my friends and I get jokes from it." Her words not mine.. I don't watch glee and never have But shows the influence of popular culture over kids being cool and fitting in. Being gay/bi etc is seriously not a big deal to them as it was to ppl of my generation(late 40s) and that is a good thing IMO
"Teaching all girls to be lesbians" is exactly what is going on here,
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Polygamy is with consenting adults
Incest can also be with consenting adults
What if your 19yr old daughter and husband wanted a sexual relationship? Consenting adults. Decided to fight for the right to get married. They are in love. They can't help who they fall in love with. Is it wrong?
What if one man and 4 women all want to get married in DC and fight to have equal rights. Is it wrong?
There is no difference.
Shorter PP: I oppose legal marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women because I oppose incestuous marriage and polygamy.
Not a very logical argument.
Actually it truly is. Can you explain how it is not?
Because marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women is neither incestuous nor polygamy.
It's like saying, "I don't like pepperoni pizza because I don't like anchovies or black olives."
That is not the point. Gays/lesbians were once considered taboo and are now fighting and receiving equal rights. Transgendered are on their role. So why not polygamy? Also considered taboo, also unrelated. Why can't they fight for their rights? Why can't a father/daughter? Cousins can in some states. Why not other family members?
No difference. Just perception.
So, even if this were true, why does it bother you so much? Most people don't fall in love with their relatives (there are strong biological reasons that prevent this), just as most people aren't interested in a committed relationship with more than one person at the same time (trying to maintain a relationship with just one is complicated enough). So how does it affect you if the rare brother and sister, or Tom, Dick and Jane who feel this way about each other are able to get married?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Polygamy is with consenting adults
Incest can also be with consenting adults
What if your 19yr old daughter and husband wanted a sexual relationship? Consenting adults. Decided to fight for the right to get married. They are in love. They can't help who they fall in love with. Is it wrong?
What if one man and 4 women all want to get married in DC and fight to have equal rights. Is it wrong?
There is no difference.
Shorter PP: I oppose legal marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women because I oppose incestuous marriage and polygamy.
Not a very logical argument.
Actually it truly is. Can you explain how it is not?
Because marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women is neither incestuous nor polygamy.
It's like saying, "I don't like pepperoni pizza because I don't like anchovies or black olives."
That is not the point. Gays/lesbians were once considered taboo and are now fighting and receiving equal rights. Transgendered are on their role. So why not polygamy? Also considered taboo, also unrelated. Why can't they fight for their rights? Why can't a father/daughter? Cousins can in some states. Why not other family members?
No difference. Just perception.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Polygamy is with consenting adults
Incest can also be with consenting adults
What if your 19yr old daughter and husband wanted a sexual relationship? Consenting adults. Decided to fight for the right to get married. They are in love. They can't help who they fall in love with. Is it wrong?
What if one man and 4 women all want to get married in DC and fight to have equal rights. Is it wrong?
There is no difference.
Shorter PP: I oppose legal marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women because I oppose incestuous marriage and polygamy.
Not a very logical argument.
Actually it truly is. Can you explain how it is not?
Because marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women is neither incestuous nor polygamy.
It's like saying, "I don't like pepperoni pizza because I don't like anchovies or black olives."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Why? What's so "disgusting" about this? There is a concentrated effort in schools by the LGBT lobby to bring about "tolerance," which translates to "acceptance," which of course translates to "give it a try!"
Which dictionary are you using?
Anonymous wrote:I asked my 17 yo DC about this after hearing her friends call each other "wives" yet almost all of them have boyfriends. Her exact words " I blame glee ..its teaching all girls to be lesbians and my friends and I get jokes from it." Her words not mine.. I don't watch glee and never have But shows the influence of popular culture over kids being cool and fitting in. Being gay/bi etc is seriously not a big deal to them as it was to ppl of my generation(late 40s) and that is a good thing IMO
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Polygamy is with consenting adults
Incest can also be with consenting adults
What if your 19yr old daughter and husband wanted a sexual relationship? Consenting adults. Decided to fight for the right to get married. They are in love. They can't help who they fall in love with. Is it wrong?
What if one man and 4 women all want to get married in DC and fight to have equal rights. Is it wrong?
There is no difference.
Shorter PP: I oppose legal marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women because I oppose incestuous marriage and polygamy.
Not a very logical argument.
Actually it truly is. Can you explain how it is not?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Polygamy is with consenting adults
Incest can also be with consenting adults
What if your 19yr old daughter and husband wanted a sexual relationship? Consenting adults. Decided to fight for the right to get married. They are in love. They can't help who they fall in love with. Is it wrong?
What if one man and 4 women all want to get married in DC and fight to have equal rights. Is it wrong?
There is no difference.
Shorter PP: I oppose legal marriage for 2 unrelated adult men or 2 unrelated adult women because I oppose incestuous marriage and polygamy.
Not a very logical argument.
Anonymous wrote:
Polygamy is with consenting adults
Incest can also be with consenting adults
What if your 19yr old daughter and husband wanted a sexual relationship? Consenting adults. Decided to fight for the right to get married. They are in love. They can't help who they fall in love with. Is it wrong?
What if one man and 4 women all want to get married in DC and fight to have equal rights. Is it wrong?
There is no difference.