Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

I do not know what this guy did wrong.

Now can we please stop maligning a dead man?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:possible new case in TX: http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/health/2014/10/08/patient-frisco-ebola-suspect/16922477/

This is no bueno. If you are the guy to deliver a quarantine order to the potential ebola case, wouldn't protective gear be a sensible consideration? :/

Anonymous wrote:I hope people remember what this man did that resulted in his infection. He is dead today because he helped try to obtain medical care for a dying pregnant woman who was turned away from the hospital. He may or may not have known she had Ebola, but either way it was a pretty noble thing to do. What a tragedy.

Anonymous wrote:

Progressive Democrat, Dr. Louis Farrakhan Muhammad, Sr., has also made it about race. Specifically, that whites created Ebola as a bio-weapon to kill Africans.

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

I do not know what this guy did wrong.

Now can we please stop maligning a dead man?

Anonymous wrote:possible new case in TX: http://www.wfaa.com/story/news/health/2014/10/08/patient-frisco-ebola-suspect/16922477/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

Cite, please.

See the LA Times article posted at 14:48.

And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite.

So what you're saying is that it isn't really clear, correct?

Well we can't ask him anymore can we?

But given his lies on forms in Africa and his failure to notify the hospital during his 1st visit - not to mention his family's atrocious and dangerous behavior since then, I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He knew he was exposed and he didn't care who he killed as a result.

I'm really confused by your logic. He must have known he'd been exposed because he said he wasn't on the forms and didn't tell people. Does the reverse hold true? If he had told everyone that he had ebola, would you take that as evidence that he didn't know he had it?

Your reading comprehension is poor. Please try to follow along with this thread, particularly the PP who challenged your logic when she wrote: "And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite."

Anonymous wrote:Dallas police officer who entered Duncan's apartment without protective gear.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

Cite, please.

See the LA Times article posted at 14:48.

And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite.

So what you're saying is that it isn't really clear, correct?

Well we can't ask him anymore can we?

But given his lies on forms in Africa and his failure to notify the hospital during his 1st visit - not to mention his family's atrocious and dangerous behavior since then, I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He knew he was exposed and he didn't care who he killed as a result.

I'm really confused by your logic. He must have known he'd been exposed because he said he wasn't on the forms and didn't tell people. Does the reverse hold true? If he had told everyone that he had ebola, would you take that as evidence that he didn't know he had it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

Cite, please.

See the LA Times article posted at 14:48.

And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite.

So what you're saying is that it isn't really clear, correct?

Your reading comprehension is poor. Please try to follow along with this thread, particularly the PP who challenged your logic when she wrote: "And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite."

Well we can't ask him anymore can we?

But given his lies on forms in Africa and his failure to notify the hospital during his 1st visit - not to mention his family's atrocious and dangerous behavior since then, I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He knew he was exposed and he didn't care who he killed as a result.

I'm really confused by your logic. He must have known he'd been exposed because he said he wasn't on the forms and didn't tell people. Does the reverse hold true? If he had told everyone that he had ebola, would you take that as evidence that he didn't know he had it?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So fleeing to the US did not work as a cure. It just infected others.

+1

Maybe that'll be a lesson for others trying this approach.

What others were infected?

The in your face people thinking they are so educated and progressive is disgusting. This man as sad as it did should never have entered the U.S. Ebola is serious and should not be treated like it's a common cold. That's how some of you are making this to be. And it's not about color.

So far Jesse Jackson seems like the only one who has made this about color, and I doubt he's on this thread. Because I, a progressive, think this man had no right to come here knowingly (and I admit that's just how I see it and it is not yet a proven fact) and infectiously.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

Cite, please.

See the LA Times article posted at 14:48.

And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite.

So what you're saying is that it isn't really clear, correct?

Well we can't ask him anymore can we?

But given his lies on forms in Africa and his failure to notify the hospital during his 1st visit - not to mention his family's atrocious and dangerous behavior since then, I'm not inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt.

He knew he was exposed and he didn't care who he killed as a result.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He did not know he had the virus when he came here.

He stopped to help a pregnant women to the hospital, not knowing that she had ebola.

Cite, please.

See the LA Times article posted at 14:48.

And there are just as many other news article that state he knew she had ebola. So that's not a dependable cite.

So what you're saying is that it isn't really clear, correct?