Anonymous wrote:
There was a thread a while back about busing, and some parent (a mom I'm guessing) said that she thought it was a bad idea because her Larla has been expecting a really expensive grand prom, and if they bused her to a poorer school then she would get her dreams crushed. And also, for the the lower ses kid, that kid might feel left out in the higher ses school because the kid can't afford the expensive first cars, lavish vacations, designer clothes, etc... And yes, the poster got flamed. But there are people out there that do think this way. Scary.
Anonymous wrote:"Have you tried to drive, during rush hour, from someplace like Potomac to anywhere east of Bethesda or far enough into Rockville that you're reaching kids who are not also wealthy? It's a long-ass drive. "
But part of the long commute is because the pull zone for the magnets is so big, right? If you are focusing the busing on particular areas rather than pick-up from very dispersed spots it might not take that long to reverse commute east.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are you pro-busing folks actually hoping to accomplish?
Is the goal diversity in schools as an end to itself?
So you think LES kids will get a better education if mixed in with wealthier kids?
Do you think wealthier kids need the "reality check" of a more diverse -- economically and racially -- school?
Does it just bother you on some gut level that there is a disparity of income in MoCo?
Genuine question.
MCPS is ALREADY busing for socioeconomic diversity. This is something that MCPS is ALREADY doing. MCPS is doing that, right now.
And yes, it's a well-established fact that poor kids do better in low-poverty schools than in high-poverty schools.
Really? Where are they busing the kids from for SES diversity to Wootton or Churchill?
There was a thread a while back about busing, and some parent (a mom I'm guessing) said that she thought it was a bad idea because her Larla has been expecting a really expensive grand prom, and if they bused her to a poorer school then she would get her dreams crushed. And also, for the the lower ses kid, that kid might feel left out in the higher ses school because the kid can't afford the expensive first cars, lavish vacations, designer clothes, etc... And yes, the poster got flamed. But there are people out there that do think this way. Scary.
See 10:16 above. MCPS is already busing. BUSING EXISTS in Montgomery County. Just not in the super-affluent, super-white neighborhoods.
That's part of the problem. Why are the super affluent schools exempt from the busing?
Have you tried to drive, during rush hour, from someplace like Potomac to anywhere east of Bethesda or far enough into Rockville that you're reaching kids who are not also wealthy? It's a long-ass drive. This is precisely why many W parents/kids don't pursue competitive magnet programs on the eastern side of the county and stay with their home schools. The 2-3 hour daily commute is not worth it.
I didn't care for the poster who complained about diluting her fancy prom either, but there are practical considerations about busing kids in and out of the W districts having nothing to do with how the different races/SES groups feel about each other. BCC happens to abut neighborhoods where busing can make the schools more diverse, but the further west you go, the harder the logistics get.
Also, many of these schools are already overcapacity. That is a consideration too.
Anonymous wrote:Liberal whites will always protect their children from the consequences of their politics . The reason whites in the south are conservative is that they actually live and educate together with the natural friction. But at least they integrate, the northern whites have the worst character on earth meticulously separating themselves but preaching inclusion to raise themselves up and receive adulation. It's so gross.
Anonymous wrote:
That's part of the problem. Why are the super affluent schools exempt from the busing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are you pro-busing folks actually hoping to accomplish?
Is the goal diversity in schools as an end to itself?
So you think LES kids will get a better education if mixed in with wealthier kids?
Do you think wealthier kids need the "reality check" of a more diverse -- economically and racially -- school?
Does it just bother you on some gut level that there is a disparity of income in MoCo?
Genuine question.
MCPS is ALREADY busing for socioeconomic diversity. This is something that MCPS is ALREADY doing. MCPS is doing that, right now.
And yes, it's a well-established fact that poor kids do better in low-poverty schools than in high-poverty schools.
Really? Where are they busing the kids from for SES diversity to Wootton or Churchill?
There was a thread a while back about busing, and some parent (a mom I'm guessing) said that she thought it was a bad idea because her Larla has been expecting a really expensive grand prom, and if they bused her to a poorer school then she would get her dreams crushed. And also, for the the lower ses kid, that kid might feel left out in the higher ses school because the kid can't afford the expensive first cars, lavish vacations, designer clothes, etc... And yes, the poster got flamed. But there are people out there that do think this way. Scary.
See 10:16 above. MCPS is already busing. BUSING EXISTS in Montgomery County. Just not in the super-affluent, super-white neighborhoods.
That's part of the problem. Why are the super affluent schools exempt from the busing?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What are you pro-busing folks actually hoping to accomplish?
Is the goal diversity in schools as an end to itself?
So you think LES kids will get a better education if mixed in with wealthier kids?
Do you think wealthier kids need the "reality check" of a more diverse -- economically and racially -- school?
Does it just bother you on some gut level that there is a disparity of income in MoCo?
Genuine question.
MCPS is ALREADY busing for socioeconomic diversity. This is something that MCPS is ALREADY doing. MCPS is doing that, right now.
And yes, it's a well-established fact that poor kids do better in low-poverty schools than in high-poverty schools.
Really? Where are they busing the kids from for SES diversity to Wootton or Churchill?
There was a thread a while back about busing, and some parent (a mom I'm guessing) said that she thought it was a bad idea because her Larla has been expecting a really expensive grand prom, and if they bused her to a poorer school then she would get her dreams crushed. And also, for the the lower ses kid, that kid might feel left out in the higher ses school because the kid can't afford the expensive first cars, lavish vacations, designer clothes, etc... And yes, the poster got flamed. But there are people out there that do think this way. Scary.
See 10:16 above. MCPS is already busing. BUSING EXISTS in Montgomery County. Just not in the super-affluent, super-white neighborhoods.
That's part of the problem. Why are the super affluent schools exempt from the busing?
Anonymous wrote:"BUSING EXISTS in Montgomery County. Just not in the super-affluent, super-white neighborhoods. "
+1 It seems that in most areas of the county they do make an effort to zone in some of the middle class families; but they basically abandon this effort when it comes to the SW part of the county so that it doesn't much impact the richest area - mostly just middle class & poor kids mixing rather than rich & poor.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So what is the solution? Forced busing? Open all schools to lottery so that all kids might be bused 2-3 hours each day to school? Force developers to build low-income housing projects in wealthy neighborhoods, or prohibit further development of expensive housing in W districts? I'm wondering what *specifically* MoCo and MCPS should do beyond what it's doing?
Why do you assume that the only way to increase the supply of not-ridiculously-expensive housing in wealthy neighborhoods is to force developers to build "low-income housing projects"? How about allowing developers to build multi-family housing (including apartment and condo buildings) in wealthy neighborhoods? How about allowing homeowners in wealthy neighborhoods, as well as non-wealthy neighborhoods, to create and rent out accessory apartments?