Anonymous wrote:Ok--following up on my earlier post that started with "this is a joke." The pre-Vick, post-Vick comment is intriguing but wrong. Before Vick, Tech was absolutely and undeniably the 3d best school in Virginia (UVA and W&M) were above. JMU was a "regional" school at best and the odor of the area around the campus was stifling due to the nearby hog rendering plants. Hated driving past that place on my way to Tech. Tech's campus is consistently ranked by various sources as one the most beautiful in the country (along with UVA). JMU does not rate.
So before Vick, people who wanted a good school went to Tech. After Vick, people who wanted a good school and a big football program went to Tech. Those that couldn't get it in, went to JMU.
And you are absolutely in need of more of whatever your are drinking (probably rendered pig fat) if you think JMU is better than W & M. If you do, I have some land I'd like to sell you...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You JMU alums are so jealous of Virginia Tech. JMU is not even a real division 1 school. Tech is an ACC school and is ranked as a top national university. It is also one of the top research grant receiving institutions in the world. JMU is a fine regional university but it's not on par with Tech in admissions selectivity or anything else.
JMU is now getting more applicants than VA Tech and JMU is a smaller school. The SAT scores of admitted applicants are pretty similar. JMU now seems to get the students who just missed getting into C of WM and UVA. As for the ACC, most students could care less about college sports.
This is a joke. How can all the posters ignore the data about SAT scores and GPAs of accepted students? For all of those statistics, VT is "better" than JMU. JMU might be "better" for one kid and VT better for another but if you are looking solely at the academic achievements of the accepted students, VT is "better."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You JMU alums are so jealous of Virginia Tech. JMU is not even a real division 1 school. Tech is an ACC school and is ranked as a top national university. It is also one of the top research grant receiving institutions in the world. JMU is a fine regional university but it's not on par with Tech in admissions selectivity or anything else.
JMU is now getting more applicants than VA Tech and JMU is a smaller school. The SAT scores of admitted applicants are pretty similar. JMU now seems to get the students who just missed getting into C of WM and UVA. As for the ACC, most students could care less about college sports.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W&M
UVA
JMU and U of Richmond
GMU
VT and MW
W&M above UVA, as well as JMU?? I'll have a glass of what she's having please.![]()
I think W&M is perceived by some as being more...(for lack of a better word) intellectual (in a grind sort of way) than UVA. This seems especially true among the teens/young adults I know. I don't rank it above UVA, but it doesn't surprise me that someone might.
Let's not confuse boredom with intellect.
What I'm saying is that W&M seems to have a reputation of being boringly intellectual.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This obsession with rankings is kind of crazy. Some schools just fit certain students better than others.
For example many kids who apply to William and Mary don't even apply to Virginia, and vice versa. Virginia does southern prep very well, and not everybody is into that. William and Mary appeals to the nerdier types. Some kids want an urban campus and VCU fills that better than the other VA schools. It's not all about rankings.
It's not like all the best students go to UVA, the second best to W&M, and the third best to JMU. It's more nuanced than that.
So true. My DC applied to several schools, including W&M, JMU, and UMW. Tech and UVA didn't interest him. He was smart enough to know where he would be happy and where he wouldn't.
Anonymous wrote:This obsession with rankings is kind of crazy. Some schools just fit certain students better than others.
For example many kids who apply to William and Mary don't even apply to Virginia, and vice versa. Virginia does southern prep very well, and not everybody is into that. William and Mary appeals to the nerdier types. Some kids want an urban campus and VCU fills that better than the other VA schools. It's not all about rankings.
It's not like all the best students go to UVA, the second best to W&M, and the third best to JMU. It's more nuanced than that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:After one person weighs in that VT is better, and another person weighs in that JMU is better, and it goes on and on, yes in terms of perceived prestige from FFX residents, they are equal. Departments will vary.
That seems to be true. Long ago, Va Tech was the clear #3 in the state, but that has changed with the rise of JMU. It was kind of inevitable that the many top students who did not get into W & M and UVA and wanted to study liberal arts needed a third choice. JMU has evolved into that choice.
Anonymous wrote:This obsession with rankings is kind of crazy. Some schools just fit certain students better than others.
For example many kids who apply to William and Mary don't even apply to Virginia, and vice versa. Virginia does southern prep very well, and not everybody is into that. William and Mary appeals to the nerdier types. Some kids want an urban campus and VCU fills that better than the other VA schools. It's not all about rankings.
It's not like all the best students go to UVA, the second best to W&M, and the third best to JMU. It's more nuanced than that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W&M
UVA
JMU and U of Richmond
GMU
VT and MW
W&M above UVA, as well as JMU?? I'll have a glass of what she's having please.![]()
I think W&M is perceived by some as being more...(for lack of a better word) intellectual (in a grind sort of way) than UVA. This seems especially true among the teens/young adults I know. I don't rank it above UVA, but it doesn't surprise me that someone might.
Let's not confuse boredom with intellect.
Anonymous wrote:NP here, but I do know that JMU historically and openly admits a wide variety of students based not only on scores. They make an effort to create a very diverse student body (race, public service, etc.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:W&M
UVA
JMU and U of Richmond
GMU
VT and MW
W&M above UVA, as well as JMU?? I'll have a glass of what she's having please.![]()
I think W&M is perceived by some as being more...(for lack of a better word) intellectual (in a grind sort of way) than UVA. This seems especially true among the teens/young adults I know. I don't rank it above UVA, but it doesn't surprise me that someone might.