Anonymous wrote:The only ethical option here is abortion.
Anonymous wrote:My next door neighbors are in their mid fifties and they have a two year old. Total accident
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is fake.
No way a 56-year-old would say "none of our kids were planned. We just go with it."
No way they wouldn't have been pushed to do a CVS/amnio/Maternit21 by 15 weeks.
OP, if you're for real, did you have a nuchal test? Where was it done? What were the age-adjusted percentage results?
Well, none of our kids were planned. We got pregnant naturally. Yes there was a period of about 4 years where I went on BC because finances were terrible and we couldn't afford to have another child. We were "asked" about the testing, but we chose not to have it done. We had a blood test at 10 weeks and the result was "low" chance for DS so we have not had more testing. Also, we were informed about having a test in the 2nd tri to check on neural tube abnormalities, again we are opting to not have any unnecessary testing. It is our belief that if something such as an illness can not be healed, there is no point in becoming concerned about it. We are concerned about the increased risk of birth defects, but that obviously comes with the territory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is fake.
No way a 56-year-old would say "none of our kids were planned. We just go with it."
No way they wouldn't have been pushed to do a CVS/amnio/Maternit21 by 15 weeks.
OP, if you're for real, did you have a nuchal test? Where was it done? What were the age-adjusted percentage results?
Well, none of our kids were planned. We got pregnant naturally. Yes there was a period of about 4 years where I went on BC because finances were terrible and we couldn't afford to have another child. We were "asked" about the testing, but we chose not to have it done. We had a blood test at 10 weeks and the result was "low" chance for DS so we have not had more testing. Also, we were informed about having a test in the 2nd tri to check on neural tube abnormalities, again we are opting to not have any unnecessary testing. It is our belief that if something such as an illness can not be healed, there is no point in becoming concerned about it. We are concerned about the increased risk of birth defects, but that obviously comes with the territory.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is fake.
No way a 56-year-old would say "none of our kids were planned. We just go with it."
No way they wouldn't have been pushed to do a CVS/amnio/Maternit21 by 15 weeks.
OP, if you're for real, did you have a nuchal test? Where was it done? What were the age-adjusted percentage results?
Well, none of our kids were planned. We got pregnant naturally. Yes there was a period of about 4 years where I went on BC because finances were terrible and we couldn't afford to have another child. We were "asked" about the testing, but we chose not to have it done. We had a blood test at 10 weeks and the result was "low" chance for DS so we have not had more testing. Also, we were informed about having a test in the 2nd tri to check on neural tube abnormalities, again we are opting to not have any unnecessary testing. It is our belief that if something such as an illness can not be healed, there is no point in becoming concerned about it. We are concerned about the increased risk of birth defects, but that obviously comes with the territory.
Anonymous wrote:This is fake.
No way a 56-year-old would say "none of our kids were planned. We just go with it."
No way they wouldn't have been pushed to do a CVS/amnio/Maternit21 by 15 weeks.
OP, if you're for real, did you have a nuchal test? Where was it done? What were the age-adjusted percentage results?
Anonymous wrote:I didn't post the "ethical option" comment.
-OP
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:obviously accidental. The age concern is an issue to us. We are looking into open adoption.
Wait - are you OP?
yes
How can you give up your own child for adoption???
Who else's child would you give up for adoption?!
Wow, how clever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:obviously accidental. The age concern is an issue to us. We are looking into open adoption.
Wait - are you OP?
yes
How can you give up your own child for adoption???
Who else's child would you give up for adoption?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:obviously accidental. The age concern is an issue to us. We are looking into open adoption.
Wait - are you OP?
yes
How can you give up your own child for adoption???