Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP - If you can eliminate 25 kids/grade - that's 100 kids which is about 2/3 of the current overcrowding. Does it solve the whole problem? No. But that's a sizable percentage. Should we look at ALL COSAs? Yes. But that doesn't mean you do nothing at all while you work through the other COSAs.
And couldn't this be seen as an opportunity to increase the number of Spanish 7 classes around the entire system? Why should BCC be one of the few when there are surely home school communities that would appreciate the option.
Because, when you take 25 immersion kid and split them up around 20 high schools, that means that there are only a few kids prepared for Spanish 7 at each school -- not enough to offer a successful class. You can't have an effective Spanish class that is teaching to three different levels of Spanish in the same classroom. This would mean that each group is getting about 15 minutes of instruction and spending the rest of the time teaching themselves. Not really an effective strategy in a foreign language.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I just don't think that the argument about keeping the community of students together through high school will be persuasive with MCPS, since kids in other immersion programs only stay together through middle school. There are even middle schools in the county where students articulate to different high schools.
Saying the same lie over and over is not going to work. Chinese immersion students go to Churchill, RCF go to BCC and SSIM can do choice. That means that now all immersion students are treated as if the were in boundary. So stop repeating the same LIE!
Anonymous wrote:PP - If you can eliminate 25 kids/grade - that's 100 kids which is about 2/3 of the current overcrowding. Does it solve the whole problem? No. But that's a sizable percentage. Should we look at ALL COSAs? Yes. But that doesn't mean you do nothing at all while you work through the other COSAs.
And couldn't this be seen as an opportunity to increase the number of Spanish 7 classes around the entire system? Why should BCC be one of the few when there are surely home school communities that would appreciate the option.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of the people I know who applied to immersion did so to try and avoid the DCC. Doing away with the BCC option might encourage people who aren't actually that interested in the immersion aspect to stick with their neighborhood schools or move.
Most people in Sligo and rolling terrace are from the DCC and some from Bethesda attend these programs so what's your point?
I know parents who sent their kids to Rolling Terrace and then tested them into Rock Creek Forest later (a younger sibling was admitted there) so that they could go to BCC. All to avoid DCC.
All anecdotal... If you go to RCF it's cause you want to go to BCC, if you go to Rolling Terrace it's cause you want to go to test in later... Sheesh. Many want to go to RCF because its full immersion by the way. I know for a fact that at you do not know every family in immersion or their motivations and it doesn't even matter. Bottom line is it makes sense for kids to continue on in a cluster they've been in whether its BCC, Gaithersburg or wherever.
Yes it's anecdotal but it's definitely a primary motivation for a number of families I've spoken to.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of the people I know who applied to immersion did so to try and avoid the DCC. Doing away with the BCC option might encourage people who aren't actually that interested in the immersion aspect to stick with their neighborhood schools or move.
Most people in Sligo and rolling terrace are from the DCC and some from Bethesda attend these programs so what's your point?
I know parents who sent their kids to Rolling Terrace and then tested them into Rock Creek Forest later (a younger sibling was admitted there) so that they could go to BCC. All to avoid DCC.
All anecdotal... If you go to RCF it's cause you want to go to BCC, if you go to Rolling Terrace it's cause you want to go to test in later... Sheesh. Many want to go to RCF because its full immersion by the way. I know for a fact that at you do not know every family in immersion or their motivations and it doesn't even matter. Bottom line is it makes sense for kids to continue on in a cluster they've been in whether its BCC, Gaithersburg or wherever.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of the people I know who applied to immersion did so to try and avoid the DCC. Doing away with the BCC option might encourage people who aren't actually that interested in the immersion aspect to stick with their neighborhood schools or move.
Most people in Sligo and rolling terrace are from the DCC and some from Bethesda attend these programs so what's your point?
I know parents who sent their kids to Rolling Terrace and then tested them into Rock Creek Forest later (a younger sibling was admitted there) so that they could go to BCC. All to avoid DCC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of the people I know who applied to immersion did so to try and avoid the DCC. Doing away with the BCC option might encourage people who aren't actually that interested in the immersion aspect to stick with their neighborhood schools or move.
Most people in Sligo and rolling terrace are from the DCC and some from Bethesda attend these programs so what's your point?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Many of the people I know who applied to immersion did so to try and avoid the DCC. Doing away with the BCC option might encourage people who aren't actually that interested in the immersion aspect to stick with their neighborhood schools or move.
Most people in Sligo and rolling terrace are from the DCC and some from Bethesda attend these programs so what's your point?
Anonymous wrote:Many of the people I know who applied to immersion did so to try and avoid the DCC. Doing away with the BCC option might encourage people who aren't actually that interested in the immersion aspect to stick with their neighborhood schools or move.
Anonymous wrote:Those of you pressing to keep articulating to BCC really need to get your facts straight. Chinese may have a case to continue to Churchill since this is a less commonly taught language. Immersion students attending SSI out of boundary have no advantage in the choice process and often are not admitted to overcrowded Blair after several appeals - however they can apply to CAP at Blair since SSI is a Blair/DCC feeder school.
Spanish through AP is offered at every school. If a school doesn't currently offer level 7, you can request that the central office explain the need to the home high school which may result in a class with multiple levels. Its done that way even at Blair currently.
The case to be made is to continue immersion through high school as they do in PG County at Roosevelt. Then special articulation would actually make sense.
Anonymous wrote:I just don't think that the argument about keeping the community of students together through high school will be persuasive with MCPS, since kids in other immersion programs only stay together through middle school. There are even middle schools in the county where students articulate to different high schools.