Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I officially hate dcum for making me feel so poor. Ridiculous.
Another +1. Nothing against this OP. though.
If we were bringing in a six-figure HHI, let alone anything in the realm of $1 million, I'd be going NUTS at Whole Foods and I'd finally buy some decent bras.
+1!
EXACTLY!
I have to work and still can't afford fancy bras.
I have been wearing the same two bras for months now because I'm too lazy/broke to go out and buy new ones. Plus I'm still going to lose that extra 15 pounds, right?
Get out! I have bras that are years old. YEARS, I tell you!
Ugh - I'm wearing a few bras that are probably a decade old. The eye hooks are all bent, they are ripped and tattered. I was waiting until weaned to see if I go down a size, but I'm now inspired to go buy a few new bras!
I go nuts, absolutely NUTS, at Whole Foods--daily visitor---but I am still wearing old bras while I'm shopping there. When- I finally get a new one (once in a blue moon) I usually just grab it off a Target rack.
Anonymous wrote:14:08 - totally agree that not everyone has the benefit of flexibility. But OP has said she and her DH alternates aging early and since she doesn't seem to really care about furthering her career, I've asked a couple times here if she could do part-time or some kind of flex schedule to cut back on hours. With that much money (a $5k mortgage), I don't think you'd be needing to live a 1.5-hour commute from your work unless you really wanted to. My advice was very specific to the OP's situation, but being home by 4 obviously isn't an option for many people.
I'm done by 4 if I telework and home by 4:30-5 if I don't. I also have a boss who lets me put in another hour in the evening and cut out an hour early. I'm Federal government and theres a big telework and flex schedule push right now. And we purposely chose a smaller house closer in to avoid any hour-plus commutes.
Anonymous wrote:I'm a SAHM who posted earlier - a couple more thoughts.
1) I am a little annoyed that my 4yo daughter thinks that women stay home and raise babies. I've tried explaining that some moms work. Some stay home. Some dads even stay home. I've tried to explain that I used to work and I might go back to work someday. But she just nods unconvinced. So part of me wants to go back just to be a different kind of role model for her - not just a mom.
2) I am a horrible "housewife". Cleaning, dishes, etc. are just not my thing. I have tried to do more since I've been home, even though I don't think of it as really why I'm home. But I generally do have a bit more time at home than DH so I try. But I absolutely hate it. If I wasn't at home I'm sure there would be less dirty dishes and clean up to do at the end of the day. We still do outsource general cleaning, but the day-to-day cleaning up really grates on me. A LOT. My DH would be a much better "housewife", but he'd suck as a SAHD.
But I still don't regret our decision, but wanted to give full disclosure that it's not all sunshine and roses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Hi OP - I'm the one you quoted in the post above and appreciate you adding additional details to your query. That's why each and every family needs to make a decision that works best for them and them alone - everyone's preferences, values, financial situations, and the needs of your individual child, etc. vary so widely.
Definitely be thinking about this long-term - what works best for you now, when the kids are in elementary, when the kids are in HS, and after they are gone? But really none of what you posted sounds like you need to quit. It sounds like rationalizing what you WANT to do. And if you want to quit and you don't feel like you'll ever value your work and you are fine with not being able to get back into the workplace, then by all means, go for it. There are plenty of very happy SAHMs that have posted.
But to your post, here's what I would say if you're truly on the fence - you have a great preschool that you're very happy with. Your kids are under 5, but not yet in school? Stick with your current situation until they are in school and then re-evaluate. What time would you be able to leave work at the earliest? Do you have the option to be part-time or flex-time?
Yes, kids generally like to do more activities as they get older - I'm a full-time working parent and my kids do do soccer, art, and music class at various times during the year. Everything is on the weekends or in the evenings. I don't think that's a good enough reason to quit (again, unless you just really want to).
I'm not sure why you would need a full-time nanny/housekeeper, driver, or a live-in or why one of you couldn't be home in the afternoon even if you both work? We don't have any of those and no "young kid" is driving our kids around. I guess it depends on the flexibility of your work schedules and how far your school is and what time it gets out. And you're only talking about 3:00pm on at the earliest. Part-time or flex-time would totally work for you if it was possible. Again, not a reason in and of itself to totally quit working.
Most days I pick my daughter up from the bus at 4pm and we DO help with homework and have friends over and do classes after school. On the two or three days a week that I get home later, we maybe don't have a playdate or a class, but I still help with homework and cook dinner, etc. And I work full-time. They are not mutually exclusive.
It's hard when they are younger, but now that my oldest is in Kindergarten, I am glad I kept working. There is a huge swath of day from 8am to 4pm when she's at school - during that time, I work. At other times, I do all the things you mentioned loving. To me personally, it seems like the best of both worlds.
Yes. My elementary school kids are out of the house from 9-4pm. That is close to a full workday. I work at home full-time. DH picks up the slack in the morning or if he has an early meeting I make it up when kids are in be dor on the weekend. If I had quite 7 years ago when I had my firstborn--there is no way I would have the gig I do now. I was able to go part-time when they were babies and toddlers and don't feel I missed much at all.
I do think there are some people that can't have the flexibility so need to quit, but I do think (as you stated) there are just as many women that want to justify not wanting to work. That is fine, but don't turn it into a Mother Theresa-type act against all other working parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I officially hate dcum for making me feel so poor. Ridiculous.
Another +1. Nothing against this OP. though.
If we were bringing in a six-figure HHI, let alone anything in the realm of $1 million, I'd be going NUTS at Whole Foods and I'd finally buy some decent bras.
+1!
EXACTLY!
I have to work and still can't afford fancy bras.
I have been wearing the same two bras for months now because I'm too lazy/broke to go out and buy new ones. Plus I'm still going to lose that extra 15 pounds, right?
Get out! I have bras that are years old. YEARS, I tell you!
Ugh - I'm wearing a few bras that are probably a decade old. The eye hooks are all bent, they are ripped and tattered. I was waiting until weaned to see if I go down a size, but I'm now inspired to go buy a few new bras!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I officially hate dcum for making me feel so poor. Ridiculous.
Another +1. Nothing against this OP. though.
If we were bringing in a six-figure HHI, let alone anything in the realm of $1 million, I'd be going NUTS at Whole Foods and I'd finally buy some decent bras.
+1!
EXACTLY!
I have to work and still can't afford fancy bras.
I have been wearing the same two bras for months now because I'm too lazy/broke to go out and buy new ones. Plus I'm still going to lose that extra 15 pounds, right?
Get out! I have bras that are years old. YEARS, I tell you!
Anonymous wrote:I'd never quit my job, mainly because I'm a product of divorce. I saw what my mother went through when my dad left, and she had to re-enter the workforce after a seven year hiatus. She was working nights at Macy's and substitute teaching when she could during the day. It took her 5 years of that to get back to the type of full time teaching job with benefits that she had before I was born. In the meantime, we wore hand me downs, and when an appliance broke, it stayed broken for years.
I'm also an economist. A study by Hewlitt et al. (Harvard Business Review 2005) found that if a woman takes any time out of the workforce, she comes back in at 81% of her previous salary, and if she takes 3+ years off, she comes back in at an average of 64% of her previous salary (averaged across all fields).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Your husband makes 500k and your biggest expense is only the $5000 mortgage. So even if it's harder to get back into the workforce, even if you have to take a paycut, it won't impact your family financially much since your family can already live well below your means currently. So apart from having to take a job that might not have maxed your potential when you left the workforce, the common downsides in terms of getting stuck with jobs with lesser pay, less prestigious jobs doesn't concern your situation. I would say go for the SAH.
The "common" downsides also include loss of husband at which point you're unprepared to take care of your kids. It's really surprising to me how many people are willing to rely on others for their financial well-being.
+1 This happens all. the. time. And so many of the women got blindsided by it.
You can also plan for some of these doomsday scenarios, such as through life insurance and/or savings. I couldn't afford to support my child on the non-profit salary I was making before I became a SAHM, does this mean we shouldn't have had a kid since we can *only* afford to support our child with DH's salary? Many in this area can only afford their house, car, childcare with 2 salaries. Does that mean they shouldn't have all those things in case one of them loses a job or dies? This argument is a non-starter for me.
Anonymous wrote:Hi OP - I'm the one you quoted in the post above and appreciate you adding additional details to your query. That's why each and every family needs to make a decision that works best for them and them alone - everyone's preferences, values, financial situations, and the needs of your individual child, etc. vary so widely.
Definitely be thinking about this long-term - what works best for you now, when the kids are in elementary, when the kids are in HS, and after they are gone? But really none of what you posted sounds like you need to quit. It sounds like rationalizing what you WANT to do. And if you want to quit and you don't feel like you'll ever value your work and you are fine with not being able to get back into the workplace, then by all means, go for it. There are plenty of very happy SAHMs that have posted.
But to your post, here's what I would say if you're truly on the fence - you have a great preschool that you're very happy with. Your kids are under 5, but not yet in school? Stick with your current situation until they are in school and then re-evaluate. What time would you be able to leave work at the earliest? Do you have the option to be part-time or flex-time?
Yes, kids generally like to do more activities as they get older - I'm a full-time working parent and my kids do do soccer, art, and music class at various times during the year. Everything is on the weekends or in the evenings. I don't think that's a good enough reason to quit (again, unless you just really want to).
I'm not sure why you would need a full-time nanny/housekeeper, driver, or a live-in or why one of you couldn't be home in the afternoon even if you both work? We don't have any of those and no "young kid" is driving our kids around. I guess it depends on the flexibility of your work schedules and how far your school is and what time it gets out. And you're only talking about 3:00pm on at the earliest. Part-time or flex-time would totally work for you if it was possible. Again, not a reason in and of itself to totally quit working.
Most days I pick my daughter up from the bus at 4pm and we DO help with homework and have friends over and do classes after school. On the two or three days a week that I get home later, we maybe don't have a playdate or a class, but I still help with homework and cook dinner, etc. And I work full-time. They are not mutually exclusive.
It's hard when they are younger, but now that my oldest is in Kindergarten, I am glad I kept working. There is a huge swath of day from 8am to 4pm when she's at school - during that time, I work. At other times, I do all the things you mentioned loving. To me personally, it seems like the best of both worlds.
Anonymous wrote:
2) I am a horrible "housewife". Cleaning, dishes, etc. are just not my thing. I have tried to do more since I've been home, even though I don't think of it as really why I'm home. But I generally do have a bit more time at home than DH so I try. But I absolutely hate it. If I wasn't at home I'm sure there would be less dirty dishes and clean up to do at the end of the day. We still do outsource general cleaning, but the day-to-day cleaning up really grates on me. A LOT. My DH would be a much better "housewife", but he'd suck as a SAHD.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I officially hate dcum for making me feel so poor. Ridiculous.
Another +1. Nothing against this OP. though.
If we were bringing in a six-figure HHI, let alone anything in the realm of $1 million, I'd be going NUTS at Whole Foods and I'd finally buy some decent bras.
+1!
EXACTLY!
I have to work and still can't afford fancy bras.
I have been wearing the same two bras for months now because I'm too lazy/broke to go out and buy new ones. Plus I'm still going to lose that extra 15 pounds, right?