Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PP -=- Why the eye rolling? It is well known in the ATS community that when Arne Duncan was appointed, he called the principal at ATS to find out how his kids could get in. She told him that they'd go at the bottom of the wait list for their grade.
If I had a nickel for every APS/Arne Duncan reference....
Seriously, is there really no one else of any interest whose kids attend APS? What will you do when he leaves the area?
. Poor sucker.Anonymous wrote:PP -=- Why the eye rolling? It is well known in the ATS community that when Arne Duncan was appointed, he called the principal at ATS to find out how his kids could get in. She told him that they'd go at the bottom of the wait list for their grade.

Anonymous The ATS lottery is held in public and isn't rigged. (If it were, surely Arne Duncan's kids would be there.) [/quote wrote:
![]()
Anonymous wrote:
ATS is slated to get those seats b/c they can fill them without the cascading boundary changes a new neighborhood school would cause. With waitlists of 100 per grade those seats will fill immediately and draw more kids out of the already over-crowded schools with no muss, no fuss. Makes perfect sense.
Anonymous wrote:
Not accurate. It draws some from overcrowded schools and more from schools at or below capacity (unless the lottery is rigged in favor of N. Arlington). Only 10 schools are currently above capacity. Assuming a fair lottery and sufficient demand from all parts of the county (which is a safe bet) 1/2 of the seats in the new addition would be filled by schools currently undercapacity. So in effect, the ATS addition only accomplished the goal of reducing overcrowding by half. Whereas a Glebe addition, would be right in the midst of 8 overcrowded schools and be far more beneficial to reducing overcrowding where it exists (in N. Arlington).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Not accurate. It draws some from overcrowded schools and more from schools at or below capacity (unless the lottery is rigged in favor of N. Arlington).
It's not rigged, but it has more students from the nearby schools than from others (can't find the PDF), presumably because families that live close to it are more likely to apply because parents -- as you may have heard? -- don't want their children spending ages on a bus to get to and from school.
Anonymous wrote:
Not accurate. It draws some from overcrowded schools and more from schools at or below capacity (unless the lottery is rigged in favor of N. Arlington).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
ATS is slated to get those seats b/c they can fill them without the cascading boundary changes a new neighborhood school would cause. With waitlists of 100 per grade those seats will fill immediately and draw more kids out of the already over-crowded schools with no muss, no fuss. Makes perfect sense.
But there are already cascading boundary changes even with those seats filled. that's the entire point of the More Seats for More Students project.
Those seats haven't been built yet so, no, they aren't filled yet.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read the thread: There is no place to put another school along the Orange Line. (I wish there were.) I think taking over Key for a plain vanilla school would be a mistake; the lower-income native Spanish speakers should not have to travel further to attend Key. Like the proposals to change Hoffman-Boston, it's pretty arrogant to decide that you're going to take a disadvantaged group's school away because you've decided something else should go there instead.
What has happened to the Wilson School site that makes it no longer available?
good question. at the boundary meeting tonight, people asked for clarification as to why choice schools were off the table (so, for example, is it really impracticable so not worth considering?), but the speaker was unable to speak to even that question, much less any specifics re: the choice schools. for example, why ATS gets 220 extra seats when the boundary schools are so overcrowded. or why ASFS is still considered a "choice" school when it actually functions now as a boundary school given that scant few have or will get in via lottery in the future.
ATS is slated to get those seats b/c they can fill them without the cascading boundary changes a new neighborhood school would cause. With waitlists of 100 per grade those seats will fill immediately and draw more kids out of the already over-crowded schools with no muss, no fuss. Makes perfect sense.
Kirkwood to Quincy the longest two block stretch in America. It's more like 5 blocks, the streets off 13th and 14th just don't all go through.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Read the thread: There is no place to put another school along the Orange Line. (I wish there were.) I think taking over Key for a plain vanilla school would be a mistake; the lower-income native Spanish speakers should not have to travel further to attend Key. Like the proposals to change Hoffman-Boston, it's pretty arrogant to decide that you're going to take a disadvantaged group's school away because you've decided something else should go there instead.
What has happened to the Wilson School site that makes it no longer available?
good question. at the boundary meeting tonight, people asked for clarification as to why choice schools were off the table (so, for example, is it really impracticable so not worth considering?), but the speaker was unable to speak to even that question, much less any specifics re: the choice schools. for example, why ATS gets 220 extra seats when the boundary schools are so overcrowded. or why ASFS is still considered a "choice" school when it actually functions now as a boundary school given that scant few have or will get in via lottery in the future.
Ok, then substitute ASF for Key so we don't do anything that could be perceived as harming a Disadvantaged Group.Anonymous wrote:Read the thread: There is no place to put another school along the Orange Line. (I wish there were.) I think taking over Key for a plain vanilla school would be a mistake; the lower-income native Spanish speakers should not have to travel further to attend Key. Like the proposals to change Hoffman-Boston, it's pretty arrogant to decide that you're going to take a disadvantaged group's school away because you've decided something else should go there instead.
Anonymous wrote:http://www.tbp.org/pubs/Features/W07Brown.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
ATS is slated to get those seats b/c they can fill them without the cascading boundary changes a new neighborhood school would cause. With waitlists of 100 per grade those seats will fill immediately and draw more kids out of the already over-crowded schools with no muss, no fuss. Makes perfect sense.
But there are already cascading boundary changes even with those seats filled. that's the entire point of the More Seats for More Students project.