Anonymous wrote:The title of this thread is unfortunate, because there are tax strategies that can benefit anyone, not just you 1%ers. If you search online, there are dozens and dozens of articles suggesting strategies. https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&gl=us&tbm=nws&q=tax+strategy+2012&oq=tax+strategy+2012&gs_l=news-cc.3..43j43i400.16170.24511.0.24979.17.5.0.12.0.0.136.357.4j1.5.0...0.0...1ac.1.W9iosCcATdk#hl=en&safe=off&tbo=d&gl=us&tbm=nws&sclient=psy-ab&q=tax+strategy+2012+year+end+estate+capital+&oq=tax+strategy+2012+year+end+estate+capital+&gs_l=serp.3...8401.8401.5.9066.1.0.1.0.0.0.0.0..0.0...0.0...1c.1.SsMuaovmlHA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_cp.r_qf.&fp=92b6671ad676249a&bpcl=38093640&biw=1400&bih=937
Some of the most common for general application:
1. Get paid in 2012 instead of 2013. Since marginal tax rates likely will increase in 2013, you'll pay less tax in 2012, albeit sooner. See if your employer will pay any year end bonus in Dec 2012 rather than Jan 2013, get an advance on your paycheck, or maybe cash in vacation time.
2. Swap around any investments you have in taxable accounts, so you can "lock in" current long-term capital gains tax rates. Tax rates on long-term capital gains are expected to increase in 2013 and beyond, so sell those investments now and re-purchase other comparable (but not identical) investments. You will pay more taxes in the short term, but (maybe) will pay less than you'd pay later in the future. Bonus points if you can offset sales of gainers against losers, because you can avoid taxes entirely with this hedge move.
3. Make gifts now to minimize future estate taxes. Estate tax rates likely will increase in 2013. This might not make sense if you expect to live several more years, unless your estate is enormous. If your estate is that enormous, you surely can pay someone more informed than I am to give you advice.
4. Take advantage of itemized deductions now. Some of those itemized deductions are expected to be reduced in 2013, so get the maximum tax benefit now. For example, if you're planning to give $1000 to your favorite charity, give it in Dec 2012 rather than Jan 2013.
I'm no investment professional, and I'm just repeating what I've been reading lately, so don't follow this advice blindly. Do your own research. Good luck.
Sam2
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
All things considered, we're better off if teens are saving for retirement, don't you think?
And if they work. I'm all for teens (inclduing wealthy teens) having jobs in the summer, as opposed to non-stop travel, camps and hanging out. Good job, 1% parents!
Wait. One of you pointed out that the Roth IRA can be withdrawn at any time before retirement. That really the only purpose is to let their summer job earnings accumulate earnings tax free until the kid feels like withdrawing it.
So let's be clear here: we're not teaching kids about saving for retirement -- instead we're teaching them about tax strategies. Guess it's something a 1% kid would need to know about.
Whatever you read, you misread or someone misspoke. Because that's not how Roth works.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I don't think pp was a jerk but was stating facts and simply annoyed with others' disregard for them. This isn't an emotional thread. It's fact-based.
Oh please. If you really think this thread is fact-based rather than emotional, then stop posting patronizing stuff about homework and ignorant statements. Better yet, stop boasting about your $$ on DCUM. Then you might actually be able to convince yourself, and us, that you're a mature person.
Not the posters you're terrorizing but I think you should get a glass of wine and go back to the general parenting forum. Causethe personal finance stuff really gets you worked up. [/b]
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
All things considered, we're better off if teens are saving for retirement, don't you think?
And if they work. I'm all for teens (inclduing wealthy teens) having jobs in the summer, as opposed to non-stop travel, camps and hanging out. Good job, 1% parents!
Wait. One of you pointed out that the Roth IRA can be withdrawn at any time before retirement. That really the only purpose is to let their summer job earnings accumulate earnings tax free until the kid feels like withdrawing it.
So let's be clear here: we're not teaching kids about saving for retirement -- instead we're teaching them about tax strategies. Guess it's something a 1% kid would need to know about.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Their contributions can be withdrawn at any time without taxes or penalties. The earnings must stay in. Do your homework before you make ignorant statements.
You sound like a total jerk. The last sentence was necessary ... why? Gotta love the sort of poster this thread attracts.
Eh, the knowledgable pp here's got a point. And "the sort of poster this thread attracts"? That's a joke, right?
A jerk is a jerk is a jerk.
I don't think pp was a jerk but was stating facts and simply annoyed with others' disregard for them. This isn't an emotional thread. It's fact-based.
Oh please. If you really think this thread is fact-based rather than emotional, then stop posting patronizing stuff about homework and ignorant statements. Better yet, stop boasting about your $$ on DCUM. Then you might actually be able to convince yourself, and us, that you're a mature person.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
All things considered, we're better off if teens are saving for retirement, don't you think?
And if they work. I'm all for teens (inclduing wealthy teens) having jobs in the summer, as opposed to non-stop travel, camps and hanging out. Good job, 1% parents!
Anonymous wrote:
All things considered, we're better off if teens are saving for retirement, don't you think?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Their contributions can be withdrawn at any time without taxes or penalties. The earnings must stay in. Do your homework before you make ignorant statements.
You sound like a total jerk. The last sentence was necessary ... why? Gotta love the sort of poster this thread attracts.
Eh, the knowledgable pp here's got a point. And "the sort of poster this thread attracts"? That's a joke, right?
A jerk is a jerk is a jerk.
I don't think pp was a jerk but was stating facts and simply annoyed with others' disregard for them. This isn't an emotional thread. It's fact-based.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We're having our teens open Roth IRAs with the amount each made in their summer jobs.
I bet that'll make them want to get a summer job next year.
We're doing this with part of their earnings. It's a great idea.
But it looks like the first PP is making her kids put the entire amount in the IRAs. (And Roth IRAs for kids, not regular IRAs?) Unless she's reimbursing her kids, they are coming out with nothing.
The kids never come out with nothing. Believe me.
+1 The kids benefit from the Roth IRAs in their names, not the parents!
Right, when they turn 59 1/2 years old they can withdraw it. That's 40+ years from now.
Or are you teaching your kids this lesson: get a job and your parents will pay you "fake" wages. Because if the kids aren't allowed to keep at least some of their own earnings, you know that mommy and daddy are compensating them in some other way. Indeed, the kids never come out with nothing, like PP says. So mommy and daddy buy them an iPad as a "reward" for working and saving for retirement.
Starting to save when you're young is key to retirement security. But how do you think clear-eyed kids are interpreting this little charade?
All things considered, we're better off if teens are saving for retirement, don't you think?
Anonymous wrote:It's perfectly fine to ask questions about finance, but to post about how your tax strategy involves million dollar IRAs and $350k in taxes and is anyone paying as much is, as someone else said, classless at best.
I think if you are someone who is worried about the generation skipping tax, and how to shelter millions of dollars indefinitely (a la Mitt Romney), you probably can't expect that discussion of those strategies in this forum will remain entirely neutral.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Their contributions can be withdrawn at any time without taxes or penalties. The earnings must stay in. Do your homework before you make ignorant statements.
You sound like a total jerk. The last sentence was necessary ... why? Gotta love the sort of poster this thread attracts.
Eh, the knowledgable pp here's got a point. And "the sort of poster this thread attracts"? That's a joke, right?
A jerk is a jerk is a jerk.