Anonymous wrote:This thread needs to be renamed ''Michael Phelps and His Impact on Gifted Education in Virginia "
I disagree. Extensive prepping for a test could strengthen neural pathways in the brain. This could potentially lead to the development of a better conceptual understanding of the topic being studied. See (http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6018/772.abstract) for further elaboration on this.
I disagree. Extensive prepping for a test could strengthen neural pathways in the brain. This could potentially lead to the development of a better conceptual understanding of the topic being studied. See (http://www.sciencemag.org/content/331/6018/772.abstract) for further elaboration on this.
No one is arguing againg intellectual enrichment. What people are arguing is that prepping for a specific test does not increase anything beyond the test score on that test.
The AAP tests are used based on the assumption that there was no prep. They are scaled that way. If the kids prep, then a different scaling will be required. In effect FCPS is doing that by downweighting the tests relative to the GBRS.
Anonymous wrote:No one is arguing againg intellectual enrichment. What people are arguing is that prepping for a specific test does not increase anything beyond the test score on that test.
The AAP tests are used based on the assumption that there was no prep. They are scaled that way. If the kids prep, then a different scaling will be required. In effect FCPS is doing that by downweighting the tests relative to the GBRS.
No one is arguing againg intellectual enrichment. What people are arguing is that prepping for a specific test does not increase anything beyond the test score on that test.
The AAP tests are used based on the assumption that there was no prep. They are scaled that way. If the kids prep, then a different scaling will be required. In effect FCPS is doing that by downweighting the tests relative to the GBRS.
No, no one is saying Phelps would be where he is without hard work and that he wasted his time. What is being said is that his hard work would only get him so far without talent and the correct body type. Most of the rest of us do not compete with Michael Phelps. We can certainly enjoy swimming but we will never reach his level. That is why most of us don't have numerous Olympic medals hanging on our walls
The problem is that we cannot determine with certainty who will be the next Michael Phelps of physics using a standard test in second grade. As oppose to body size and shape that cannot be drastically changed naturally no matter how hard one tries, human brain is quite elastic and does change when properly worked. The idea that only kids with raw talent in early ages need to be in an advanced academic environment is counter productive.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:AAP to TJ to UVA. Once heard it was akin to winning the lottery.[/quote
Only UVA? I heard that's basically backup plan for TJ students.
It is not the back-up plan for the majority. It's a sure thing for many and note they do not mass migrate to VA TECH. The state school with more engineering.
Anonymous wrote:
No, no one is saying Phelps would be where he is without hard work and that he wasted his time. What is being said is that his hard work would only get him so far without talent and the correct body type. Most of the rest of us do not compete with Michael Phelps. We can certainly enjoy swimming but we will never reach his level. That is why most of us don't have numerous Olympic medals hanging on our walls.