Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kids don't go to Bullis, but I'm familiar with the school through my work in college admissions. Bullis underwent a tremendous change for the better during the tenure of the immediate past HOS. For a while it seemed to be developing a niche as a more balanced place than many other area schools -- i.e., solid academics, but at a level that still allowed kids to participate in athletics and the arts (yes, both!) It's not clear what direction the school is going in now. The new HOS (who does ooze used-car salesman -- not that there's anything wrong with that) seems to be going for a cross between a co-ed Landon and a sectarian Good Counsel. The school's PR effort is paying off in terms of garnering a higher profile for the school, but it's not clear what is happening academically.
With a higher profile, comes more money. Academics will ultimately benefit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, Lord. Here we go again with the recruiting claim. Please give the boys who leave Landon a little credit. There are many reasons why students switch schools, and the notion that Bullis coaches are out twisting arms is silly. If they chose to leave Landon, that suggests something was missing for them...I think you need to consider each case and avoid banket statements.
Yes, something was missing -- playing time at Landon.Bullis took a senior transfer lacrosse player last year -- none of the reputable schools take ANY seniors as new students, let alone an athletic recruit. Bullis has gone renegade very quickly under this new administration. (And no, not a Landon parent/affiliate.)
What you call "gone renegade" I see as a clever, if risky, plan to move Bullis out of independent school obscurity and into the realm of the "Big 3." All I know is that when I first started reading this forum, I had never even heard of Bullis. Now, it's mentioned in the same sentence as Landon. Yes, not necesssarily in a favorable light. But I suspect that over time the adage, all press is good press will prove true.
You are really on to something. I think Gerald Boarman is doing exactly what he did at the North Carolina School of Science and Mathematics and at Eleanor Roosevelt before that. He may look like a used car salesman but he's shaking things up and he's really done a lot for kids who don't usually get all the breaks as well as kids born into privilege. It will be interesting to see what Bullis becomes over the next 5 years.
Anonymous wrote:My kids don't go to Bullis, but I'm familiar with the school through my work in college admissions. Bullis underwent a tremendous change for the better during the tenure of the immediate past HOS. For a while it seemed to be developing a niche as a more balanced place than many other area schools -- i.e., solid academics, but at a level that still allowed kids to participate in athletics and the arts (yes, both!) It's not clear what direction the school is going in now. The new HOS (who does ooze used-car salesman -- not that there's anything wrong with that) seems to be going for a cross between a co-ed Landon and a sectarian Good Counsel. The school's PR effort is paying off in terms of garnering a higher profile for the school, but it's not clear what is happening academically.
Anonymous wrote:Bullis is an academic joke. But if suburban parents want to pay big bucks so their kids can get a mediocre education in the hopes of reflected glory from recruited athletes given athletic scholarships, enjoy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, Lord. Here we go again with the recruiting claim. Please give the boys who leave Landon a little credit. There are many reasons why students switch schools, and the notion that Bullis coaches are out twisting arms is silly. If they chose to leave Landon, that suggests something was missing for them...I think you need to consider each case and avoid banket statements.
Yes, something was missing -- playing time at Landon.Bullis took a senior transfer lacrosse player last year -- none of the reputable schools take ANY seniors as new students, let alone an athletic recruit. Bullis has gone renegade very quickly under this new administration. (And no, not a Landon parent/affiliate.)
What you call "gone renegade" I see as a clever, if risky, plan to move Bullis out of independent school obscurity and into the realm of the "Big 3." All I know is that when I first started reading this forum, I had never even heard of Bullis. Now, it's mentioned in the same sentence as Landon. Yes, not necesssarily in a favorable light. But I suspect that over time the adage, all press is good press will prove true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, Lord. Here we go again with the recruiting claim. Please give the boys who leave Landon a little credit. There are many reasons why students switch schools, and the notion that Bullis coaches are out twisting arms is silly. If they chose to leave Landon, that suggests something was missing for them...I think you need to consider each case and avoid banket statements.
Yes, something was missing -- playing time at Landon.Bullis took a senior transfer lacrosse player last year -- none of the reputable schools take ANY seniors as new students, let alone an athletic recruit. Bullis has gone renegade very quickly under this new administration. (And no, not a Landon parent/affiliate.)
What you call "gone renegade" I see as a clever, if risky, plan to move Bullis out of independent school obscurity and into the realm of the "Big 3." All I know is that when I first started reading this forum, I had never even heard of Bullis. Now, it's mentioned in the same sentence as Landon. Yes, not necesssarily in a favorable light. But I suspect that over time the adage, all press is good press will prove true.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oh, Lord. Here we go again with the recruiting claim. Please give the boys who leave Landon a little credit. There are many reasons why students switch schools, and the notion that Bullis coaches are out twisting arms is silly. If they chose to leave Landon, that suggests something was missing for them...I think you need to consider each case and avoid banket statements.
Yes, something was missing -- playing time at Landon.Bullis took a senior transfer lacrosse player last year -- none of the reputable schools take ANY seniors as new students, let alone an athletic recruit. Bullis has gone renegade very quickly under this new administration. (And no, not a Landon parent/affiliate.)
Anonymous wrote:Oh, Lord. Here we go again with the recruiting claim. Please give the boys who leave Landon a little credit. There are many reasons why students switch schools, and the notion that Bullis coaches are out twisting arms is silly. If they chose to leave Landon, that suggests something was missing for them...I think you need to consider each case and avoid banket statements.
Bullis took a senior transfer lacrosse player last year -- none of the reputable schools take ANY seniors as new students, let alone an athletic recruit. Bullis has gone renegade very quickly under this new administration. (And no, not a Landon parent/affiliate.)
plz let us know about bullis