Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 22:43     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 22:42     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 22:40     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 22:39     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 22:02     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday


Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 21:45     Subject: For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Lesbian mom here. I posted about Milla Jovovich on the Thursday thread and no one said anything about exploitation or dads wanking. Seriously, some of you are sexist. There's nothing wrong with posting about incredibly attractive people. I'm not sure why some feel the need to ruin it.
Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 21:34     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous wrote:Vida Guerra



This person looks like Pedro Martinez in drag.
Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 21:17     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous wrote:faux news
faux breasts

Anonymous wrote:Harris Faulkner



Don't care about the news and don't care if they're fake.
Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 20:08     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are those MAN SOCKS she's wearing? Is she wearing them because she has sweaty stinky feet? Do you think she may have a "sweating problem"? That would be a shame since men were trying to wank to a sweaty, toe-jam smelling woman. It's so sad.


You are either too young, or too old, to remember the 80's.

And trust me, there are no men "wanking" to DCUM. Did you actually think there are women masturbating to IHTT?


Huh
Let's see - a man's exposed chest compared to partially exposed breasts & women dressed as preteens

Yeah - I'd say there were "men" on dCUM wanking off.


I thought breasts weren't sexual so what difference would it make if they were exposed? At least that is the prevailing opinion on the 8 million breastfeeding threads. Many of the men on the IHHT were suggestively / seductively posed or dressed.


I don't think the majority of men think that "breasts are for babies!"

Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 20:06     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

faux news
faux breasts

Anonymous wrote:Harris Faulkner

Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 20:05     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are those MAN SOCKS she's wearing? Is she wearing them because she has sweaty stinky feet? Do you think she may have a "sweating problem"? That would be a shame since men were trying to wank to a sweaty, toe-jam smelling woman. It's so sad.


You are either too young, or too old, to remember the 80's.

And trust me, there are no men "wanking" to DCUM. Did you actually think there are women masturbating to IHTT?


Huh
Let's see - a man's exposed chest compared to partially exposed breasts & women dressed as preteens

Yeah - I'd say there were "men" on dCUM wanking off.


I thought breasts weren't sexual so what difference would it make if they were exposed? At least that is the prevailing opinion on the 8 million breastfeeding threads. Many of the men on the IHHT were suggestively / seductively posed or dressed.
Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 19:59     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Harris Faulkner

Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 19:32     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Are those MAN SOCKS she's wearing? Is she wearing them because she has sweaty stinky feet? Do you think she may have a "sweating problem"? That would be a shame since men were trying to wank to a sweaty, toe-jam smelling woman. It's so sad.


You are either too young, or too old, to remember the 80's.

And trust me, there are no men "wanking" to DCUM. Did you actually think there are women masturbating to IHTT?


Huh
Let's see - a man's exposed chest compared to partially exposed breasts & women dressed as preteens

Yeah - I'd say there were "men" on dCUM wanking off.
Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 19:27     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous wrote:Are those MAN SOCKS she's wearing? Is she wearing them because she has sweaty stinky feet? Do you think she may have a "sweating problem"? That would be a shame since men were trying to wank to a sweaty, toe-jam smelling woman. It's so sad.


You are either too young, or too old, to remember the 80's.

And trust me, there are no men "wanking" to DCUM. Did you actually think there are women masturbating to IHTT?
Anonymous
Post 04/05/2012 19:09     Subject: Re:For the Dads. I'd hit that Wednesday

Anonymous wrote:Heres an interesting observation, on the womens page, no men chime in about how unrealistic it is for the moms to drool away for Jon Hamm et al,

But here, one or more shrewtastic wenches feels the need to say something.

Its just sad, how pathetic, angry and insecure, some of you are.


It really is just sad, how pathetic, angry and insecure the people are who are calling others sad, pathetic, angry and insecure are for interrupting their tiny wankfest.