Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have the feeling this is not the answer OP is looking for but bits an honest, informed answer.
This profile has no chance at MIT and Stanford due to no big STEM awards, not recruited athlete, no famous parents, no big jobs like Google paid internship for 2 years plus an app with 100k+ users. GPA way too low for HYP. SAT not that special for Caltech and CMU especially during EA/ED; they get a lot of 1600 kids.
Your best bet is Cornell or Georgia Tech ED. UVA is not a bad choice if you get in-state tuition. Rice is possible for ED if out of state and full pay but GPA is borderline too low. Definitely too low for Penn and Duke.
Good advice here. Shoot the shot, but be realistic.
As posted earlier, there is potential arbitrage with overseas unis as they focus more on test scores (including TMUA) and depth of engagement with the chosen subject. They are also less focused on hooks, so there are more spots available in each class in real terms. Think about Cambridge, Imperial, Oxford, Warwick, St Andrews, Edinburgh, etc.
I wouldn’t pick any UK university over UVA, (or Purdue/UIUC engineering), unless it’s Oxbridge.
Funny….my son did exactly that. Picked a UK uni (not Oxbridge) over UVA for CS….just graduated from his masters at a second UK school….and is currently working at a well known tech firm in NYC…..
You’re from VA? Isn’t it much pricier to attend a UK university than UVA in state?
Anonymous wrote:Dumb question - how did he take all of these classes? My kid has 7 classes a year. 1 is PE, one is a non-honors elective, and math/Spanish are non-honors as the school doesn't offer an honorable track (just AP when you get to that point). So he had 2 honors classes and one AP. Next year will be the same. I spoke with the college counselor who confirmed he's on the most challenging track. Is this school just an even worse public school than I thought? She said they send alot of kids to UVA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have the feeling this is not the answer OP is looking for but bits an honest, informed answer.
This profile has no chance at MIT and Stanford due to no big STEM awards, not recruited athlete, no famous parents, no big jobs like Google paid internship for 2 years plus an app with 100k+ users. GPA way too low for HYP. SAT not that special for Caltech and CMU especially during EA/ED; they get a lot of 1600 kids.
Your best bet is Cornell or Georgia Tech ED. UVA is not a bad choice if you get in-state tuition. Rice is possible for ED if out of state and full pay but GPA is borderline too low. Definitely too low for Penn and Duke.
Good advice here. Shoot the shot, but be realistic.
As posted earlier, there is potential arbitrage with overseas unis as they focus more on test scores (including TMUA) and depth of engagement with the chosen subject. They are also less focused on hooks, so there are more spots available in each class in real terms. Think about Cambridge, Imperial, Oxford, Warwick, St Andrews, Edinburgh, etc.
I wouldn’t pick any UK university over UVA, (or Purdue/UIUC engineering), unless it’s Oxbridge.
Funny….my son did exactly that. Picked a UK uni (not Oxbridge) over UVA for CS….just graduated from his masters at a second UK school….and is currently working at a well known tech firm in NYC…..
Imperial is better for engineering than Oxbridge and comparable for CS.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have the feeling this is not the answer OP is looking for but bits an honest, informed answer.
This profile has no chance at MIT and Stanford due to no big STEM awards, not recruited athlete, no famous parents, no big jobs like Google paid internship for 2 years plus an app with 100k+ users. GPA way too low for HYP. SAT not that special for Caltech and CMU especially during EA/ED; they get a lot of 1600 kids.
Your best bet is Cornell or Georgia Tech ED. UVA is not a bad choice if you get in-state tuition. Rice is possible for ED if out of state and full pay but GPA is borderline too low. Definitely too low for Penn and Duke.
Good advice here. Shoot the shot, but be realistic.
As posted earlier, there is potential arbitrage with overseas unis as they focus more on test scores (including TMUA) and depth of engagement with the chosen subject. They are also less focused on hooks, so there are more spots available in each class in real terms. Think about Cambridge, Imperial, Oxford, Warwick, St Andrews, Edinburgh, etc.
I wouldn’t pick any UK university over UVA, (or Purdue/UIUC engineering), unless it’s Oxbridge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have the feeling this is not the answer OP is looking for but bits an honest, informed answer.
This profile has no chance at MIT and Stanford due to no big STEM awards, not recruited athlete, no famous parents, no big jobs like Google paid internship for 2 years plus an app with 100k+ users. GPA way too low for HYP. SAT not that special for Caltech and CMU especially during EA/ED; they get a lot of 1600 kids.
Your best bet is Cornell or Georgia Tech ED. UVA is not a bad choice if you get in-state tuition. Rice is possible for ED if out of state and full pay but GPA is borderline too low. Definitely too low for Penn and Duke.
Good advice here. Shoot the shot, but be realistic.
As posted earlier, there is potential arbitrage with overseas unis as they focus more on test scores (including TMUA) and depth of engagement with the chosen subject. They are also less focused on hooks, so there are more spots available in each class in real terms. Think about Cambridge, Imperial, Oxford, Warwick, St Andrews, Edinburgh, etc.
I wouldn’t pick any UK university over UVA, (or Purdue/UIUC engineering), unless it’s Oxbridge.
Anonymous wrote:Many better CS/Engineering schools than UVA. EA to UVA and as many other better ranked CS/Engineering schools as possible. Would not waste an ED on UVA for CS/Engineering with those stats unless UVA is kid’s dream school.
Anonymous wrote:Sounds like a great kid. But 3.8 may not get you the “more elite” schools with which you are obsessed. He likes uva. UVA is strong. And relatively cheap. It’s like you’ve won the lottery - why are you messing with this?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have the feeling this is not the answer OP is looking for but bits an honest, informed answer.
This profile has no chance at MIT and Stanford due to no big STEM awards, not recruited athlete, no famous parents, no big jobs like Google paid internship for 2 years plus an app with 100k+ users. GPA way too low for HYP. SAT not that special for Caltech and CMU especially during EA/ED; they get a lot of 1600 kids.
Your best bet is Cornell or Georgia Tech ED. UVA is not a bad choice if you get in-state tuition. Rice is possible for ED if out of state and full pay but GPA is borderline too low. Definitely too low for Penn and Duke.
Good advice here. Shoot the shot, but be realistic.
As posted earlier, there is potential arbitrage with overseas unis as they focus more on test scores (including TMUA) and depth of engagement with the chosen subject. They are also less focused on hooks, so there are more spots available in each class in real terms. Think about Cambridge, Imperial, Oxford, Warwick, St Andrews, Edinburgh, etc.
I wouldn’t pick any UK university over UVA, (or Purdue/UIUC engineering), unless it’s Oxbridge.
Yes, it totally makes sense to want the football weekend, big state school, traditional US college experience. However, for example, Imperial’s global prestige, research quality, and employment outcomes are much closer to MIT than Purdue or UIUC. It’s a very tough admit which requires extra work, but gpa might be less a liability than equivalent US schools (i.e. T10).
I knew graduates from Imperial. Have to disagree with the bolded.