Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Ahhh hah HA! HA! HAAAAAA!!!!

A Wonderful day Pukegressives!!!

Love your tears!!!

Hey buddy, if you think the voters are going to just meekly suck up your ilk destroying the country and doing anything to hold on to power, you’re stupider than I thought.

You tried to cheat as usual and you crashed and burned....Buddy.

Ahhh HA! HA! HAAAA!!

Luv it!

You fascist scumbags know all about cheating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they didn’t void it based on election rules, it would have been voided based on subjective ballot language.

The language was quite clear.

Clear as mud.
“Restore fairness”?
In what context? To whom?
If the shoe was on the other foot there’s no way you’d agree the language was not biased.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Such an epic fail by the Va Democrats.

A complete waste of time and money.

+1M not to mention a few of us are getting really tired by our local leaders in and around NOVA. It's getting to be pretty embarrassing as this point...

Anonymous wrote:In plain English, the court found that the legislature violated the VA Constitution by passing the amendment for the first time (on October 31, 2025) after early voting had already begun. By October 31, over 40% of votes had been cast in the VA 2025 General Election. It's not that tortured of a reading and I say that as a Democrat.

Personally, my view is that "election" for purposes of the VA Constitution should be read as Election Day. The VA SC disagrees. But reasonable people can disagree. That said, it's a pathetic joke if any of the judges in the majority consider themselves "Originalists" or "Textualists." They just inferred a whole lot of intent in the VA Constitution.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If they didn’t void it based on election rules, it would have been voided based on subjective ballot language.

The language was quite clear.

Anonymous wrote:Such an epic fail by the Va Democrats.

A complete waste of time and money.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The VA Suoreme Court has struck down the Semocratic gerrymander.

It's a massive win for Lucas! /s

I admit I am surprised. Shame on them. Will this go to the US SCOTUS?

How can we impeach state Supreme Court justices? How DARE they ignore the will of the people?

How dare the democrats attempt to unconstitutionally create new districts.

It was a referendum, dipshit. As Democratic as it gets.

I know, you hate democracy as much as you hate America and everything it stands for.

Honestly, we should be rioting in the streets tonight.

The idea that 50% + 1 vote can undo Virginia constitution seems insane to me. Good luck with that world. Don't care what the other states are doing. Go live there if you want to gerrymander.

That’s how referendums works.

There are constitutional rules about referendums and when those rules aren’t followed, the referendum is in unconstitutional. This court concluded that the rules weren’t followed. Democrats can try again following the rules.

The court are partisan hacks playing an extremely dangerous game. When the ballot box and the courts won’t serve justice, the People will get it another way. And right now, the People are pissed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Gloves off then. Time to start purging voter rolls and closing precincts in red districts. Two can play at this game.

You sounds nuts. There are rules everyone has to follow. This is what happens when you don't follow the rules. It's not that complicated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The VA Suoreme Court has struck down the Semocratic gerrymander.

It's a massive win for Lucas! /s

I admit I am surprised. Shame on them. Will this go to the US SCOTUS?

How can we impeach state Supreme Court justices? How DARE they ignore the will of the people?

How dare the democrats attempt to unconstitutionally create new districts.

It was a referendum, dipshit. As Democratic as it gets.

I know, you hate democracy as much as you hate America and everything it stands for.

Honestly, we should be rioting in the streets tonight.

The idea that 50% + 1 vote can undo Virginia constitution seems insane to me. Good luck with that world. Don't care what the other states are doing. Go live there if you want to gerrymander.

That’s how referendums works.

There are constitutional rules about referendums and when those rules aren’t followed, the referendum is in unconstitutional. This court concluded that the rules weren’t followed. Democrats can try again following the rules.

The court are partisan hacks playing an extremely dangerous game. When the ballot box and the courts won’t serve justice, the People will get it another way. And right now, the People are pissed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The VA Suoreme Court has struck down the Semocratic gerrymander.

It's a massive win for Lucas! /s

I admit I am surprised. Shame on them. Will this go to the US SCOTUS?

How can we impeach state Supreme Court justices? How DARE they ignore the will of the people?

How dare the democrats attempt to unconstitutionally create new districts.

Read the opinion. They used a convoluted reading of legislative procedure to overturn it.

GOP loves twisting the law to justify whatever result they want.

Nothing was convoluted. This was all known going in. It was known by the lawyers overseeing the process. It was a risk to go ahead. They understood that.

Yes, it was a risk that partisan hacks were going to overturn the will of the people. I think we know that already.

Obviously the Dems should have counted the number of republicans on the court before doing this, knowing full well that republicans will ignore the law and plain text to help their own party.

They only ruled on one aspect. That was what the hearing was about. If you listened to it, you should have known how they would rule. The Dem lawyer could not answer the questions satisfactorily, because the Dem house/senate did not follow the law.

If they had supported this, then the next step would have been a challenge to the language in the referendum. That, too, did not follow the law.

The Va Supremes upheld that law. I did read that one of the Justices that ruled to throw out the referendum was apponted by Mark Warner. Warner is a Democrat.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The VA Suoreme Court has struck down the Semocratic gerrymander.

It's a massive win for Lucas! /s

I admit I am surprised. Shame on them. Will this go to the US SCOTUS?

How can we impeach state Supreme Court justices? How DARE they ignore the will of the people?

How dare the democrats attempt to unconstitutionally create new districts.

Read the opinion. They used a convoluted reading of legislative procedure to overturn it.

GOP loves twisting the law to justify whatever result they want.

Nothing was convoluted. This was all known going in. It was known by the lawyers overseeing the process. It was a risk to go ahead. They understood that.

Yes, it was a risk that partisan hacks were going to overturn the will of the people. I think we know that already.

Obviously the Dems should have counted the number of republicans on the court before doing this, knowing full well that republicans will ignore the law and plain text to help their own party.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The VA Suoreme Court has struck down the Semocratic gerrymander.

It's a massive win for Lucas! /s

I admit I am surprised. Shame on them. Will this go to the US SCOTUS?

How can we impeach state Supreme Court justices? How DARE they ignore the will of the people?

How dare the democrats attempt to unconstitutionally create new districts.

Read the opinion. They used a convoluted reading of legislative procedure to overturn it.

GOP loves twisting the law to justify whatever result they want.

Nothing was convoluted. This was all known going in. It was known by the lawyers overseeing the process. It was a risk to go ahead. They understood that.

Yes, it was a risk that partisan hacks were going to overturn the will of the people. I think we know that already.