Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing against this meet because I assume other meets do this also, but why D E and F heats in finals? it is only 100 yrd & less events in this meet but why do D E and F heats? aren't A B and C enough?
For this meet (and not uncommon for others as well) D/E/F are for 16 and under swimmers only. To encourage development.
It is also because two meets were combined. JR/Sr which would attract younger teens to one and older/faster to the other. If they didn't do it then very few young kids would have the finals experience.
Anonymous wrote:Where did you hear this? We heard nothing from our coach
Anonymous wrote:Meet delayed?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is also because two meets were combined. JR/Sr which would attract younger teens to one and older/faster to the other. If they didn't do it then very few young kids would have the finals experience.
If you do not have finals experience by the time you are 15 then it may be time to find a new sport because high level swimming is not happening for you. What is the point of giving a “young kid” finals experience at the age of 15 if they are not going to need it at the big boy meets? They are never making those meets if they are just breaking through for the first time here. If they are the exception, then they will get more relevant finals experience at meets like the KLI or Metros where finals feel like finals, not a session fast swimmers scratch allowing 70th place finishers to swim at night
Anonymous wrote:It is also because two meets were combined. JR/Sr which would attract younger teens to one and older/faster to the other. If they didn't do it then very few young kids would have the finals experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing against this meet because I assume other meets do this also, but why D E and F heats in finals? it is only 100 yrd & less events in this meet but why do D E and F heats? aren't A B and C enough?
For this meet (and not uncommon for others as well) D/E/F are for 16 and under swimmers only. To encourage development.
It is also because two meets were combined. JR/Sr which would attract younger teens to one and older/faster to the other. If they didn't do it then very few young kids would have the finals experience.
Anonymous wrote:The meet isn’t financially feasible with tougher cuts, is my guess. Nobody with Sectional or NCSA cut is gonna care about this meet. Most of the swimmers in my kid’s group are doing 2-3 events or skipping it altogether. So if you tighten up the cuts too much, you aren’t getting enough of the kids who really want to be there or who are hunting cuts.
Maybe the bonus events should go, but otherwise, this meet kinda is what it is going to be. I’m not sure there is a way to make this meaningful.
And most other LSCs don’t exist in areas where the high school season is so meaningful. The private school kids grinded through weeks of championship meets and are prepping for bigger meets. The public school kids are coming off state champs. None of these kids care about this meet and they are mentally and physically trying to recharge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing against this meet because I assume other meets do this also, but why D E and F heats in finals? it is only 100 yrd & less events in this meet but why do D E and F heats? aren't A B and C enough?
For this meet (and not uncommon for others as well) D/E/F are for 16 and under swimmers only. To encourage development.
It is also because two meets were combined. JR/Sr which would attract younger teens to one and older/faster to the other. If they didn't do it then very few young kids would have the finals experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing against this meet because I assume other meets do this also, but why D E and F heats in finals? it is only 100 yrd & less events in this meet but why do D E and F heats? aren't A B and C enough?
For this meet (and not uncommon for others as well) D/E/F are for 16 and under swimmers only. To encourage development.
It is also because two meets were combined. JR/Sr which would attract younger teens to one and older/faster to the other. If they didn't do it then very few young kids would have the finals experience.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Nothing against this meet because I assume other meets do this also, but why D E and F heats in finals? it is only 100 yrd & less events in this meet but why do D E and F heats? aren't A B and C enough?
For this meet (and not uncommon for others as well) D/E/F are for 16 and under swimmers only. To encourage development.
Thanks makes sense, so A B and C must be mostly 17+ yr olds