Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????




Yeah, no. No guns for you.

They are hypocrites, NOW they defend the 2nd amendment? 🙄

Details matter. Carrying guns is not an absolute right without limits. It makes more sense to protect yourself from government overreach than it does to carry because you are a snowflake fearing harm from fellow community members as you go fill your prescriptions at cvs or go to Applebees.

Good luck "defending" yourself from the government. As the saying goes, "you and what army?"

It's also beyond laughable to posit that "fellow community members" are all harmless, when that group includes unincarcerated felons - who exactly do you think is robbing gas stations, hijacking cars, and robbing individuals on the street at gunpoint?

Talk about a deraingement syndrome.

STFU already. You're as dumb as you are annoying. I have no patience for you people anymore.

What exactly are you going to do about it little missy?

1) you have no idea who I am, pickle dick.
2) vote in November to end the nightmare you created. Then you'll run and hide like the roaches you are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????




Yeah, no. No guns for you.

They are hypocrites, NOW they defend the 2nd amendment? 🙄

Details matter. Carrying guns is not an absolute right without limits. It makes more sense to protect yourself from government overreach than it does to carry because you are a snowflake fearing harm from fellow community members as you go fill your prescriptions at cvs or go to Applebees.

Good luck "defending" yourself from the government. As the saying goes, "you and what army?"

It's also beyond laughable to posit that "fellow community members" are all harmless, when that group includes unincarcerated felons - who exactly do you think is robbing gas stations, hijacking cars, and robbing individuals on the street at gunpoint?

Talk about a deraingement syndrome.

STFU already. You're as dumb as you are annoying. I have no patience for you people anymore.

What exactly are you going to do about it little missy?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????




Yeah, no. No guns for you.

They are hypocrites, NOW they defend the 2nd amendment? 🙄

Details matter. Carrying guns is not an absolute right without limits. It makes more sense to protect yourself from government overreach than it does to carry because you are a snowflake fearing harm from fellow community members as you go fill your prescriptions at cvs or go to Applebees.

Good luck "defending" yourself from the government. As the saying goes, "you and what army?"

It's also beyond laughable to posit that "fellow community members" are all harmless, when that group includes unincarcerated felons - who exactly do you think is robbing gas stations, hijacking cars, and robbing individuals on the street at gunpoint?

Talk about a deraingement syndrome.

STFU already. You're as dumb as you are annoying. I have no patience for you people anymore.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????




Yeah, no. No guns for you.

They are hypocrites, NOW they defend the 2nd amendment? 🙄

Details matter. Carrying guns is not an absolute right without limits. It makes more sense to protect yourself from government overreach than it does to carry because you are a snowflake fearing harm from fellow community members as you go fill your prescriptions at cvs or go to Applebees.

Good luck "defending" yourself from the government. As the saying goes, "you and what army?"

It's also beyond laughable to posit that "fellow community members" are all harmless, when that group includes unincarcerated felons - who exactly do you think is robbing gas stations, hijacking cars, and robbing individuals on the street at gunpoint?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????




Yeah, no. No guns for you.

They are hypocrites, NOW they defend the 2nd amendment? 🙄

Details matter. Carrying guns is not an absolute right without limits. It makes more sense to protect yourself from government overreach than it does to carry because you are a snowflake fearing harm from fellow community members as you go fill your prescriptions at cvs or go to Applebees.

So only armed at protests. Got it. What could possibly go wrong?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????




Yeah, no. No guns for you.

They are hypocrites, NOW they defend the 2nd amendment? 🙄

Details matter. Carrying guns is not an absolute right without limits. It makes more sense to protect yourself from government overreach than it does to carry because you are a snowflake fearing harm from fellow community members as you go fill your prescriptions at cvs or go to Applebees.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????




Yeah, no. No guns for you.

They are hypocrites, NOW they defend the 2nd amendment? 🙄

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????

Yeah, no. No guns for you.

Keep telling yourself that. It actually works in our favor.

PS We have plenty. We just don't use them to murder school children.

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

You fools have been bleating for decades that the Second Amendment was for establishing the National Guard, not giving individuals the right to own a gun.

Now suddenly you’ve changed your mind????




Yeah, no. No guns for you.

Funny you think there are political sides. The common folk fight amongst each other whilst the rich get richer. Stop being a sheep!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I have immediate family and many colleagues in the Twin Cities. The “just comply” folks do not have a freaking clue what they are talking about.

+1 or they are blaming the people getting hurt, basically that messaging is lockstep MAGA

If you got hurt or killed because you attempted to run over a ICE officer, or because you were assaulting them and resisting arrest while carrying a gun, then guess what ? You are NOT a victim. You’re a criminal. A criminal who escalated the level of violence until it was lethal.

The thing I wonder about people being arrested for failing to comply or resisting arrest is this: If you spray painful chemicals in someone’s eyes and hold them down, it seems like an automatic physical response to the pain would be to struggle and writhe, in response to the immediate pain, not as an attempt to disobey. Does that ever enter the conversation? I’d love to hear from physicians/scientists on this issue.

My family was here in 1600s too. i have no problem with that el Salvadoran man if he’s not trying to terrorize the populace like ICE. Your family came for a. Better life and so did mine. And heads up our families “sneaked” in too. There were no laws back then, cowboy. This is a country of immigrants. Deal with it.

+1. Same here.

Anonymous wrote:


DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY UPDATES ON THIS SUPPOSED SURGE IN MOCO?

https://www.reddit.com/r/MontgomeryCountyMD/comments/1qufkq6/ice_is_here_at_cava_on_fenton_in_downtown_silver/

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY UPDATES ON THIS SUPPOSED SURGE IN MOCO?

Anonymous wrote:This is why we have the second amendment. Exactly this scenario -- to protect ourselves from ICE and the national guard and the military.

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed".

+1