Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 7 year old was just at my niece's birthday party with a bunch of 3 year olds and handled himself more maturely. Did some 3 year olds bother him and cross his boundaries? Absolutely. He said no and then asked for a break.
Did none of the people talking about kids touching stuff not have younger siblings? I'm about 8 years older than my youngest sibling and yes, she got into stuff and no, I wasn't allowed to smack her.
If you read the OP‘s update, you’d see that the teenager tried by moving her things and going to a different room. The five year followed. The parent of the five-year-old should have intervened and redirected her child to something else instead of assuming a teenager is going to babysit for free.
The teen also could have talked to OP or her own parent. Like my 7 year old talked to me.
Again, not hard to avoid hitting a kid.
The 15 year old is ALSO a kid, dummy.
Right which is why none of us are suggesting that the 4 year old’s parents press charges or knock he’s lights out, which is how we respond if an unrelated adult assaulted our child.
Really, you think pressing charging or attacking a child should be an Option?
I wrote "none of us are suggesting . . . " which obviously mean I'm not suggesting it. But if an adult did that to my child, one of those two things would be the outcome.
So, suggesting something like not taking the girl shopping, is recognizing that she's a child. Even children shouldn't get rewarded for violence. They should get age appropriate consequences.
Anonymous wrote:This is why you don’t date people with teens and then try to bring them around family and pretend everyone is one big happy family.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 7 year old was just at my niece's birthday party with a bunch of 3 year olds and handled himself more maturely. Did some 3 year olds bother him and cross his boundaries? Absolutely. He said no and then asked for a break.
Did none of the people talking about kids touching stuff not have younger siblings? I'm about 8 years older than my youngest sibling and yes, she got into stuff and no, I wasn't allowed to smack her.
If you read the OP‘s update, you’d see that the teenager tried by moving her things and going to a different room. The five year followed. The parent of the five-year-old should have intervened and redirected her child to something else instead of assuming a teenager is going to babysit for free.
That you think smacking a little kid at that point was the only option is pretty ridiculous.
I don't think it was a smack. It was a swat.
Are you people living in a cave, or are you around young folks? A swat happens pretty regularly. Go to the mall and hang out where the kids hang out, and you will see plenty of swats happening. Sheesh.
I don't know what kind of trashy universe you live in but no, I do NOT SEE PEOPLE SWATTING EACH OTHER REGULARLY.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 7 year old was just at my niece's birthday party with a bunch of 3 year olds and handled himself more maturely. Did some 3 year olds bother him and cross his boundaries? Absolutely. He said no and then asked for a break.
Did none of the people talking about kids touching stuff not have younger siblings? I'm about 8 years older than my youngest sibling and yes, she got into stuff and no, I wasn't allowed to smack her.
If you read the OP‘s update, you’d see that the teenager tried by moving her things and going to a different room. The five year followed. The parent of the five-year-old should have intervened and redirected her child to something else instead of assuming a teenager is going to babysit for free.
The teen also could have talked to OP or her own parent. Like my 7 year old talked to me.
Again, not hard to avoid hitting a kid.
The 15 year old is ALSO a kid, dummy.
My kid's babysitter is 15. You guys infantilizing teenagers are doing them no favors.
Children can be babysitters. Treating children like children isn’t infantilizing. This is a weird response considering how helicoptery parents are on here towards their adult kids.
2 year olds in daycare get told "no, we don't hit". Acting like a 15 year old is somehow less savvy (and gets presents for hitting kids) is treating a kid appropriately?
A 15 year old should know not to hit. But, expecting them to act like an adult and calling them crap is unacceptable.
Where does it say they expected the 15 year old to act like an adult. SIL yelled at the boyfriend who demonstrated SIL was right by buying his child gifts. He literally rewarded his daughter smacking a preschooler. He's a shit parent, SIL is right.
People on this thread did. Teens make mistakes.
And a normal parent would ground their kid for this. Not take them shopping.
If I was the mom of the girl, I’d be glad her dad defended her from a yelling adult.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Team Teen. I’m assuming the girl didn’t immediately resort to swatting him on the arm. And I’m assuming SIL wasn’t discipline fhim or keeping a proper eye on him.
Depending on how long you’ve been dating your boyfriend, these are quasi-family. Teens and toddlers will sometimes scuffle or not act like their best selves. Your SIL overreacted. And your boyfriend got pissed and met her energy.
Same.
A swat on the arm is hardly abuse. The mom wasn't controlling the 5-year old, letting him bug the 15-year old. A 15-year old will resort to a swat. Would the mom have preferred the teen verbally rip into the kid and let him have it, which is another 15-year old reaction?
I think the dad was rewarding the teen's sense of boundaries. Good on him, he sounds like a good dad. You don't want your young child annoying others, and you don't want teens resorting to any kind of harsh reaction. A swat is not a harsh reaction. The one who failed in this situation is the small child's mom who wouldn't control her young child and then over-reacted to the teen's mild swat.
Do you realize that there are options beyond these two?![]()
Do YOU realize that there are options beyond *allowing* a teen to swat a five year old and calling her a “crap, trash” person?
You people are absolute morons. It’s mind-blowing.
It sure tracks that the person who defends smacking children is going around calling everyone morons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My 7 year old was just at my niece's birthday party with a bunch of 3 year olds and handled himself more maturely. Did some 3 year olds bother him and cross his boundaries? Absolutely. He said no and then asked for a break.
Did none of the people talking about kids touching stuff not have younger siblings? I'm about 8 years older than my youngest sibling and yes, she got into stuff and no, I wasn't allowed to smack her.
If you read the OP‘s update, you’d see that the teenager tried by moving her things and going to a different room. The five year followed. The parent of the five-year-old should have intervened and redirected her child to something else instead of assuming a teenager is going to babysit for free.
That you think smacking a little kid at that point was the only option is pretty ridiculous.
I don't think it was a smack. It was a swat.
Are you people living in a cave, or are you around young folks? A swat happens pretty regularly. Go to the mall and hang out where the kids hang out, and you will see plenty of swats happening. Sheesh.
Anonymous wrote:PPs it's quite clear this thread is getting troll bombed. Nobody is so stupid they'd call a little swat a big issue. A swat is like a gentle shove, nothing more.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:PPs it's quite clear this thread is getting troll bombed. Nobody is so stupid they'd call a little swat a big issue. A swat is like a gentle shove, nothing more.
Teenagers don't get to shove unrelated children either.
Are you really saying that if you took your preschooler somewhere and an unrelated 15 year old swatted or smacked or shoved them, you'd be OK with that?
Anonymous wrote:PPs it's quite clear this thread is getting troll bombed. Nobody is so stupid they'd call a little swat a big issue. A swat is like a gentle shove, nothing more.