Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are Bates and Middlebury so poor in comparison? Didn’t both fire their prior Presidents? Netflix guy must be giving big bucks to Bowdoin.
Um, because they are not the same caliber as WASP-B?
why not? what can’t you get at Middlebury that you can at WASP?
Anonymous wrote:Why are Bates and Middlebury so poor in comparison? Didn’t both fire their prior Presidents? Netflix guy must be giving big bucks to Bowdoin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are Bates and Middlebury so poor in comparison? Didn’t both fire their prior Presidents? Netflix guy must be giving big bucks to Bowdoin.
Um, because they are not the same caliber as WASP-B?
Anonymous wrote:Why are Bates and Middlebury so poor in comparison? Didn’t both fire their prior Presidents? Netflix guy must be giving big bucks to Bowdoin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are Bates and Middlebury so poor in comparison? Didn’t both fire their prior Presidents? Netflix guy must be giving big bucks to Bowdoin.
Middlebury is at $1.7B, and Bates at $500M. Hardly poor.
Anonymous wrote:What's up with Principia College? Williams challenger?
Anonymous wrote:Why are Bates and Middlebury so poor in comparison? Didn’t both fire their prior Presidents? Netflix guy must be giving big bucks to Bowdoin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Could someone let me know what WASP-B stands for? I tried googling it and clearly I am too tired or something, but I couldn’t figure out the colleges.
It is a fictional creation created by someone who is posting on this thread pretending to be several different posters. Same Shit Different Day.
You are not reading this thread if you think it is a fictional creation. Bowdoin belongs with WASP — and no other SLACs do. Endowment, yield, admit rate - everything. If you want to make an actual, rational argument why it does not belong, please do so. Oh, wait! You can’t…
Bowdoin parent here. The obsession over the acronym is so dumb. Please stop.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s amazing about Bowdoin’s international magnet. What countries and why Bowdoin.
It's one of only 10 colleges that are need-blind for international students, so a lot of needy kids throw their hat in the ring, likely not realizing they have a 1.4% chance of acceptance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Need-blind_admission
And honestly? I find the premise mostly false. You’re “need-blind” but you heavily restrict international applications, and still obviously take internationals from the best high schools in their country (aka Rich students). It’d be like saying your need blind and then mostly taking students from private boarding schools in Massachusetts.
Anonymous wrote:Why are Bates and Middlebury so poor in comparison? Didn’t both fire their prior Presidents? Netflix guy must be giving big bucks to Bowdoin.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That’s amazing about Bowdoin’s international magnet. What countries and why Bowdoin.
It's one of only 10 colleges that are need-blind for international students, so a lot of needy kids throw their hat in the ring, likely not realizing they have a 1.4% chance of acceptance.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Need-blind_admission
Anonymous wrote:That’s amazing about Bowdoin’s international magnet. What countries and why Bowdoin.