Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For STEM, yes.
In my opinion, yes for everything
+1 Weed out weak students earlier and encourage trade/vocational schools. Stop the nonsense that everyone can do college level academic work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:European way, at least in the UK, is also somewhat holistic. Academic proficiency matters more there, though, and I think they consider the right mix of holistic and academic qualifications.
Not sure their system would work in the US unless we also switched to making kids lock in their majors when they enter college. For example, great math and physics test scores are going to matter if you want to major in physics, but not so much history.
Top U.K. schools practice hardcore DEI to ensure that they are not completely dominated by private school kids.
The DEI that they use is mostly by income and location. IMO, that's fine. Also, UK schools mostly look at your test scores. They don't really care that much about your extra curriculars, so their students aren't
That is the type of DEI practiced by the UCs in California which cause howling by Asian families here on DCUM.
I don't think most Asian Americans, especially immigrants are against SES based diversity given that there are actually a fair amount of low income Asian families in CA.
-signed an Asian American originally from SoCal
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2024/03/27/key-facts-about-asian-americans-living-in-poverty/
I think that is great but the Bay Area Asian community has a very different view of things.
Is there a difference between SoCal Asians and Bay Area Asians that I'm not aware of?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, of course, which is why we sent our son to oxford. AMA