Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why would ND play in a meaningless game that benefits ESPN, a network that openly lobbied against them for weeks?
The system is broken. Everything is biased toward the SEC and their broadcast partner, ESPN, is leading the charge.
Maybe to benefit their fans and the players ?
Anonymous wrote:Why would ND play in a meaningless game that benefits ESPN, a network that openly lobbied against them for weeks?
The system is broken. Everything is biased toward the SEC and their broadcast partner, ESPN, is leading the charge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t get it. ND was ranked ahead of Alabama. Alabama lost and suddenly jumped ND and Miami then slides into its slot. Very sleezy moves by the committee considering neither Miami nor ND played this week. ND was slotted in the top ten for 5 weeks. CFP can no longer have any credibility.
If it had been a close loss I might understand, but they were absolutely destroyed.
Anonymous wrote:Why would ND play in a meaningless game that benefits ESPN, a network that openly lobbied against them for weeks?
The system is broken. Everything is biased toward the SEC and their broadcast partner, ESPN, is leading the charge.
Anonymous wrote:Why would ND play in a meaningless game that benefits ESPN, a network that openly lobbied against them for weeks?
The system is broken. Everything is biased toward the SEC and their broadcast partner, ESPN, is leading the charge.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Bad look for ND. Meltdown in the cereal aisle.
This is such bullshit. Anyone who is even slightly objective has to concede that the committee did a terrible job and led Notre Dame on before pulling the rug out from under them.
Can anyone dispute that this is how it all went down:
Basically you had to be in the top ten to get into the playoff as an at large team.
For several weeks in a row the committee rankings were
9. Notre Dame
10. Alabama
11. BYU
12. Miami
Then in the last week of the regular season and out of the blue they switched it to
9. Alabama
10. ND
11. BYU
12. Miami
They said they made the switch because Alabama was “impressive” in squeaking by a touchdown over Auburn, even though Auburn’s record was only 5-7 and the game was in doubt until the very end
That same weekend ND flew out to Stanford, 4-8, and won by 29 points after resting all its starters in a game that didn’t even start until 10:30 pm in ND’s time zone
The following weekend Alabama and BYU play in their conference championship games. Both get embarrassed
Notre dame and Miami didn’t play games because their seasons were over
So the final rankings come out:
9. Alabama
10. Miami
11. ND
12. BYU
The committee “explained” that it didn’t drop Alabama because it shouldn’t be penalized for playing an extra game (the championship game for their conference) no matter how badly they played
BUT they penalized BYU for the same exact thing and dropped them!
It then “explained” that with ND and Miami now right next to each other the tie breaker was that they played each other in August at Miami and Miami won by 3. So they moved Miami up to 10 and ND down to 11 and out of the playoffs
BUT here’s the thing: they’ve known since DAY ONE that Miami won that game but every single week still ranked ND ahead of Miami because they said ND’s entire season was more impressive.
If this isn’t pulling the rug out from under a bunch of 19 and 20 year olds, what is?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Duke has more reason to complain than ND.
The game between Duke and UVA was painful to watch. The ACC has a real problem on its hands.
Anonymous wrote:Michigan is getting used to reality their future chances of getting into CFP are minimal. Harbaugh knew it and as an alum, left asap. No consistency in football selection. In basketball any school even those with sub .500 records if they win the Conference Championship get the automatic bid to NCAA dance. Duke got screwed and why Miami? Put in Ga Tech or SMU, which beat Miami. Look at the contrast between academic reputations and wealth if Duke and ND versus those of Miami, Bama, and JMU. Doubt many of the selection committee members graduated from a top 20 undergraduate school.
Anonymous wrote:Look at the contrast between academic reputations and wealth if Duke and ND versus those of Miami, Bama, and JMU. Doubt many of the selection committee members graduated from a top 20 undergraduate school.
Anonymous wrote:Duke has more reason to complain than ND.