Anonymous wrote:No school beyond top 25-30 is worth $400k over 4 years. BC’s background is like DePaul, Providence, Marquette or Seton Hall.
Anonymous wrote:Don’t know how a school like BC can justify $95k a year. Full pay and would never pay that cash for a mediocre school.
Anonymous wrote:BC does better in California because most people there aren’t aware of its humble history pre-1990s.
Anonymous wrote:Don’t know how a school like BC can justify $95k a year. Full pay and would never pay that cash for a mediocre school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I really dont know why BC doesn't have better FA. I mean, I know why ... their crap endowment. But why is their endowment so low?
BC's endowment is way higher than Georgetown's endowment. Georgetown's endowment is low because they started it later and Georgetown alumni don't give back to the school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I feel like we were misled. My kid said that on a video call for applicants the admissions team strongly encouraged submitting scores and even implied not submitting if you took the test would read as dishonest.
So my kid with scores near the 25th percentile submitted.
Yet Im seeing lots of test optional acceptances.
I wish there were clearer rules.
"near 25th percentile" isn't going to cut it.
Should have applied TO.
Anonymous wrote:I really dont know why BC doesn't have better FA. I mean, I know why ... their crap endowment. But why is their endowment so low?