Anonymous wrote:Oh look, another thread based on half / baked truths that routinely fester on dcum. Meanwhile when the staged coup, deleting thousand records over j6 and trump 2k dividend threads are routinely deleted.
Glad Jeff is equal in his monitoring!
Anonymous wrote:Oh look, another thread based on half / baked truths that routinely fester on dcum. Meanwhile when the staged coup, deleting thousand records over j6 and trump 2k dividend threads are routinely deleted.
Glad Jeff is equal in his monitoring!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone worth their salt in congress, regardless of party, needs to start impeachment proceedings NOW.
Think it will happen?
They can impeach him for something that happened before he was President? Which everyone knew about and people voted for him anyway?
Bill Clinton was impeached for lying. DJT lied about this while in office.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone worth their salt in congress, regardless of party, needs to start impeachment proceedings NOW.
Think it will happen?
They can impeach him for something that happened before he was President? Which everyone knew about and people voted for him anyway?
Bill Clinton was impeached for lying. DJT lied about this while in office.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anyone worth their salt in congress, regardless of party, needs to start impeachment proceedings NOW.
Think it will happen?
They can impeach him for something that happened before he was President? Which everyone knew about and people voted for him anyway?
Anonymous wrote:Quite honestly, I'm tired of all of this revolving around Trump. Maybe he's guilty, maybe he isn't. What we do know for a fact is that MANY powerful men were raping teenagers. Every single one of them needs to be held accountable. I don't care who they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Thinking about the girl Trump met “for hours” in Epstein’s house in 2012, I don’t think it was Giuffre. She was born in 1983, which would have made her 29 in 2012. Too old for Trump. Unless he was arranging to pay her off or something.
At the WH press conference today, Karoline Leavitt claimed that the unredacted emails are available and say that the specific girl is Guiffre, who publicly stated Trump was never improper with her. So their story is that Democrats deliberately redacted the girl's name to make it sound worse when Trump is already 'cleared' per this victim.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The usual clowns with more bs... The name of the victim Trump spent “hours with” was redacted by Dems. This was done intentionally. It’s Virginia Giuffre, her identify was unmasked by Republicans. Why did Dems conceal her ID??? Bc Giuffre praised Trump in her book as having done nothing wrong. These people are animals.
The incident in question occurred in 2012 and Giuffere left Epstein in 2002. Are you suggesting that she came back for a friendly visit ten years later?
Anonymous wrote:Uh, we all knew.
Anonymous wrote:GO MR. PRESIDENT!! These Democrats have so much poor explanation on this entire Epstein bulldung. I bet if every Democrat were to use Epstein as an excuse I would be a millionaire in about a few months.