Anonymous wrote:Or you could be like my sister in law who spent every last dollar they made and now because BIL was laid off their kids will get a full ride. Didn’t save a dollar and were rewarded.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Those schools should switch to common app. Common app doesn’t allow more than one ED.
I love ED and hope it lasts at least long enough for my second child! It’s a great option for kids not wanting to play the field. DD had a very realistic first choice and wanted an answer as soon as possible. It was great.
Oh, Common App is very easy to get around. You apply apply EA via the Common App and then just switch your "Decision Round" to ED in the school's portal. As you long as you can get a school counselor to sign the form, there is zero limit to the number of schools you can apply ED to.
Well that’s on the counselor then. I highly doubt a public school counselor such as our would allow it. Regardless, we used ED as intended and it worked beautifully for us. I’m so tired of upper middle class whiners claiming that ED won’t let them shop merit aid. Boo-effing-hoo. Kids with true need do fine in ED. Use the NPC and apply places you can afford. You’ll live.
+1
Why do some parents still not get this? T20 schools give little to no merit aid. Period. Use the NPC. If you cannot afford, move on and focus on public in-state universities or the schools that do give merit aid.
We ran this calculator when DS was born and now facing the actual cost, it turned out to be pretty damn accurate. We knew that if we wanted him to be able to attend an Ivy, we would need to save agressively. There is no way we would be able to afford a private college on our salaries if we had not planned ahead and saved. I have zero patience for upper-middle class parents who claim they are blindsided by the cost of college and they start whining about ED being unfair. https://vanguardcollege.ssnc.cloud/csp.php
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We know someone that was accepted ED to a top 20 school but backed out when accepted to a service academy. Told the school his parents were getting a divorce and could no longer afford it, but given the excruciating process of getting admission to a service academy, I’m assuming the divorce was just the excuse.
No repercussions against his HS, that I’m aware of.
Oh, this will be allowed. The Service Academies do not offer ED or EA or SCEA. It's RD for everyone. Our DC went through the West Point application process - which a very long and demanding process. But also applied ED to a T20 private university. The ED admission came before the West Point decision. So DC followed the rules, and removed the West Point app, and attends the private university. However, there was an understanding that you can prioritize a Service Academy appointment over an ED acceptance. Absolutely no university is suing anyone for choosing West Point or Annapolis or the Air Force Academy. Especially if there is a change in financial circumstances - such as a divorce - which is very legitimate reason to defer from an ED commitment for any student. In the example above, nobody did anything wrong.
AI says otherwise:
Yes, a service academy will likely rescind an offer of admission if it discovers a student broke a binding Early Decision (ED) agreement with another college. This is considered a serious breach of ethics and integrity that service academies expect from candidates.
Anonymous wrote:Here is the thing that seems like people are willfully ignoring in the ED argument. I agree BC does not offer merit ED, nor do they really offer merit in RD. That is also true of HYP and many other T20 schools. If you can’t afford it in ED you can’t afford it.
But there are a significant number of schools below that tier that do offer real merit aid, and also have an ED round. That feels like the spot where wealthy families have a distinct advantage to donut hole families. It is at that tier that it starts to feel like the benefit is designed toward the wealthy.
Anonymous wrote:ED is extremely popular in Virginia with all of the great public options. Extremely popular.
Anonymous wrote:That’s it. ED is for kids who have a clear first choice. Some kids know that by September if their senior year. Hopefully they have visited the school, researched financial aid, etc. by then. The kids who are less than 100% committed to any choice should not ED, just because they’re chasing prestige and want to avoid the unpredictability of the RD lottery. It may be hard to have to wait a few more months for a college decision. It harder to have buyer’s remorse and be enrolled at a college chosen for the wrong reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Some high schools are playing fast and loose with ED agreements. They knowingly allow students to apply ED to multiple schools if the parents press them.
Things must have been pretty crazy at Colorado Adademy for this to happen. I bet stories will start to come out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can hold two thoughts in my head at once. I can recognize that people should honor their ED commitments, and I can recognize that colleges are the ones who gain the most by filling a significant % of the class through ED. The vast majority of students do not benefit from this system.
Majority of students also don't benefit from financial aid and don't benefit from having hooks. Should schools eliminate all these? ED is fine, just like giving needy families financial aid is fine. No system is fair to everyone. I cannot afford a Maserati or Porsche and am totally at peace with my inability.
I’m not in favor of systems that encourage 17 years to lock themselves into paying $$$$ without considered choice.
NPC. NPC. NPC. You just don’t like what the NPC says you owe because you don’t manage your money wisely.
No, I can afford full pay. I can also afford the Porsche mentioned earlier. I just happen to think kids should actually spend thoughtful time considering their options than what I see in real life with the ED push everywhere. In real life, tons of parents with older kids have also told me that think there are tons of issues with the increased push for ED. It’s only on DCUM that I see it get defended as vehemently as it does.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Don’t soft/unstated bans happen all the time, and wouldn’t they be almost as effective? At my kid’s private school, “everyone” knows that certain top 20 schools love our students, some like select students (= admit fewer overall, but an extremely qualified candidate has a reasonable chance of admission), but one hasn’t admitted a single student from our school in years, since a last-minute ED acceptee withdrew. The soft ban effectively still keeps kids from applying to that univ from our school. I don’t know the family and we did not discuss with the college counselor since the school didn’t interest my child. Are others aware of rumored soft bans at their schools?
Yes, there is a top10 school that does not accept from my DC’s big3. Everyone knows the name of the school. Rumor has it that there were 2 students that backed out of ED over a period of 3 years. I am not sure if it is true, but no one gets into this school. No one.
I wonder if I am thinking of the same schools? Do they sound like Puke and Sadwell? If so, thar dynamic has existed for a long time. My youngest graduated Sadwell in ‘22
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Posters who complain about ED here want the cake and eat it too. What's why they're whining.
What does have your cake and eat it too mean in this context?
Your cake = get to ED and enjoy slight bump in admission chances
Eat it too = get to shop for merit after accepted ED
Anonymous wrote:That’s it. ED is for kids who have a clear first choice. Some kids know that by September if their senior year. Hopefully they have visited the school, researched financial aid, etc. by then. The kids who are less than 100% committed to any choice should not ED, just because they’re chasing prestige and want to avoid the unpredictability of the RD lottery. It may be hard to have to wait a few more months for a college decision. It harder to have buyer’s remorse and be enrolled at a college chosen for the wrong reasons.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can hold two thoughts in my head at once. I can recognize that people should honor their ED commitments, and I can recognize that colleges are the ones who gain the most by filling a significant % of the class through ED. The vast majority of students do not benefit from this system.
Majority of students also don't benefit from financial aid and don't benefit from having hooks. Should schools eliminate all these? ED is fine, just like giving needy families financial aid is fine. No system is fair to everyone. I cannot afford a Maserati or Porsche and am totally at peace with my inability.
I’m not in favor of systems that encourage 17 years to lock themselves into paying $$$$ without considered choice.
NPC. NPC. NPC. You just don’t like what the NPC says you owe because you don’t manage your money wisely.