Anonymous wrote:India went from one of the wealthiest nations in the world to being poorer. This is due to colonialism—the British destroyed industries and exported a huge portion of the wealth.
Try cracking open a history book.
Anonymous wrote:Why does one poster keep harping about how long India has "been around"? It just got independence from the British less than 80 yrs ago and was not a unified country until then.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing. I'm not really concerned.
Anonymous wrote:
PS: Once again, this America that was born on the backs of Black slaves doesn't hold a moral high ground. Nonetheless, America hasn't even had 250 years to figure this out, and India has been around for over 20 times that long. Neither country is a moral paragon, but surely both can do better.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Modi is doubling down on India's alliance with Russia. It's baffling. Surely cheaper gas isn't worth all the sanctions and tariffs and restrictions on the purchase of western weapons systems going forward.
But India seems to look at the alliance between Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran - and they want in. India seems keen to align with the baddies, so I would expect Indian exports - such as they are - to be pretty much non-existent in western markets going forward.
Why should India align with a bully? If you give in to Trump, he just demands more. I applaud any country that defends its sovereignty and stands up to bullies.
By the way, India agreed to give up Russian oil and buy it from the US if the US offered the same price as Russia. If buying from Russia is so bad, why didn't the US agree to sell them oil at the Russian price?
Trump shut down USAID> Our official policy is not to be subsidizing other countries.
India hasn't figured out how to thrive economically yet, and it's a country that goes back over 5000 years -- one of the o oldest continuous civilizations in the world. Selling cheaper oil right now for a few years isn't going to fix it, if 5000 years hasn't.
India went from one of the wealthiest nations in the world to being poorer. This is due to colonialism—the British destroyed industries and exported a huge portion of the wealth.
Try cracking open a history book.
When?
DP. Here ya go…curious why you doubt that India was once wealthy.
Mughal Era (1500–1700 CE):
Peak Wealth (16th–17th centuries): Under emperors like Akbar and Shah Jahan, the Mughal Empire was one of the world’s richest, contributing about 24% of global GDP by 1700. India’s economy thrived on textiles (cotton, silk), spices, and gems, exported to Europe, the Middle East, and Asia. Agra and Delhi were global commercial hubs, with the Mughal treasury amassing vast wealth (e.g., Shah Jahan’s Peacock Throne).
Colonial Decline (1700–1947):
India’s wealth declined under British colonial rule due to resource extraction, deindustrialization, and famines. By 1947, India’s global GDP share dropped to 4%. However, certain princely states and urban centers like Bombay retained localized wealth.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Modi is doubling down on India's alliance with Russia. It's baffling. Surely cheaper gas isn't worth all the sanctions and tariffs and restrictions on the purchase of western weapons systems going forward.
But India seems to look at the alliance between Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran - and they want in. India seems keen to align with the baddies, so I would expect Indian exports - such as they are - to be pretty much non-existent in western markets going forward.
Why should India align with a bully? If you give in to Trump, he just demands more. I applaud any country that defends its sovereignty and stands up to bullies.
By the way, India agreed to give up Russian oil and buy it from the US if the US offered the same price as Russia. If buying from Russia is so bad, why didn't the US agree to sell them oil at the Russian price?
Trump shut down USAID> Our official policy is not to be subsidizing other countries.
India hasn't figured out how to thrive economically yet, and it's a country that goes back over 5000 years -- one of the o oldest continuous civilizations in the world. Selling cheaper oil right now for a few years isn't going to fix it, if 5000 years hasn't.
India went from one of the wealthiest nations in the world to being poorer. This is due to colonialism—the British destroyed industries and exported a huge portion of the wealth.
Try cracking open a history book.
Anonymous wrote:I had to make a Walmart stop the other day and discovered I could buy dry garbanzos and lentils for much less than where I usually buy them so grabbed a few bags. I was curious where they were grown (thinking about tariffs and imports) and checked the package. I thought food products are supposed to show where they are packed or something. All it said was distributed by Walmart. No idea if they are US products or not. Google tells me India is the primary producer globally, and the third largest import source (after Canada and Mexico) to the US. (We also export garbanzos).
There's tons of information online about exports and imports of individual products. Found a calculator that says it gives you a real time duty calculation (companies have to keep a close eye on this stuff because it's been changing so much).
So, Canada is the major importer of garbanzos to US. Tariff is 35% right now. Mexico 24%. India 24%.
I make falafel regularly and we use a lot of hummus. Usually products like this mix sources and a global corporation will spread the cost increase across all its sources. So whether the garbanzos come from India or Canada or the US the price I pay is still going to reflect the tariff contribution across the board. Or there will just be more market pressure on the US product, end result the same.
Anonymous wrote:Nothing.
Anonymous wrote:India is literally an open sewer.