Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Daniella Weiss and other settlers must be dancing with joy at the thought of another dead Palestinian. She is the embodiment of the genocidal nature of Israeli colonizer terrorists.

“Are you capable of offering any empathy, sympathy, or sorrow for the deaths of 20,000 children in Gaza?”

Journalist Piers Morgan repeatedly presses Israeli settler leader Daniella Weiss on how she feels about the children killed in Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, as she continues to be dismissive of the question

https://x.com/trtworld/status/1945893762082672766

She is filled with hatred. It is seeping from every pore in her body. Disgusting piece of garbage of nonhuman that female.

Anonymous wrote:Daniella Weiss and other settlers must be dancing with joy at the thought of another dead Palestinian. She is the embodiment of the genocidal nature of Israeli colonizer terrorists.

“Are you capable of offering any empathy, sympathy, or sorrow for the deaths of 20,000 children in Gaza?”

Journalist Piers Morgan repeatedly presses Israeli settler leader Daniella Weiss on how she feels about the children killed in Israel’s genocidal war on Gaza, as she continues to be dismissive of the question

https://x.com/trtworld/status/1945893762082672766

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Call them whatever you want. It still doesn’t justify their genocide.

True, Hamas' genocidal ambitions are unjustified by anything, despite being enshrined in their founding "Covenant" and couched in Islamic religious language.

Likud charter, dum dum.

What about it? It says peace is a central aim of Israel's policy. It calls for the Palestinians to annul those parts of their charter which call for the destruction of Israel, and to prevent terror against Israel. It opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state but calls for Palestinian self-governance. If says nothing about annihilating Palestinians or about engaging in terror to advance political aims.

Doesn’t matter what they say. Actions speak louder than words.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Call them whatever you want. It still doesn’t justify their genocide.

True, Hamas' genocidal ambitions are unjustified by anything, despite being enshrined in their founding "Covenant" and couched in Islamic religious language.

Likud charter, dum dum.

What about it? It says peace is a central aim of Israel's policy. It calls for the Palestinians to annul those parts of their charter which call for the destruction of Israel, and to prevent terror against Israel. It opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state but calls for Palestinian self-governance. If says nothing about annihilating Palestinians or about engaging in terror to advance political aims.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Call them whatever you want. It still doesn’t justify their genocide.

True, Hamas' genocidal ambitions are unjustified by anything, despite being enshrined in their founding "Covenant" and couched in Islamic religious language.

Likud charter, dum dum.

What about it? It says peace is a central aim of Israel's policy. It calls for the Palestinians to annul those parts of their charter which call for the destruction of Israel, and to prevent terror against Israel. It opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state but calls for Palestinian self-governance. If says nothing about annihilating Palestinians or about engaging in terror to advance political aims.

Doesn’t matter what they say. Actions speak louder than words.

Ok, so you gave up arging that Likud, a single political party among many in Israel, drives some kind of whole-of-Israel anti-Palestinian, pro-terror, agenda.

Nothing Israel is doing is anything other than determined efforts to retrieve Hamas kidnapping victims while defending its soldiers. Hamas, on the other hand, is attempting genocide, guided by it's own published agenda.

Hamas surrenders, civilians stop dying. Can't get easier to understand than that.

Instead of crying about civilian casualties, focus on why there are such casualties - Hamas. Put some of your energy into asking Hamas to change course. It won't help, of course, but at least you'll be directing your vituperative diatribes to the actors ultimately responsible for every single death in Gaza instead of blaming the victims of Oct. 7 for the consequences of Hamas' poor decisions.

Over 1000 Palestinians in the West Bank have been killed since October 7. Hamas does not rule the West Bank! Prior to 10/07, 2023 had already been the deadliest year for civilians in the West Bank. Spare me you BS about if Hamas surrenders, then civilians stop dying. No, Israel has no intention to stop killing Palestinians.

In whatever and whichever ways they can get away with it, they will continue to kill Palestinians, Hamas or no Hamas.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Call them whatever you want. It still doesn’t justify their genocide.

True, Hamas' genocidal ambitions are unjustified by anything, despite being enshrined in their founding "Covenant" and couched in Islamic religious language.

Likud charter, dum dum.

What about it? It says peace is a central aim of Israel's policy. It calls for the Palestinians to annul those parts of their charter which call for the destruction of Israel, and to prevent terror against Israel. It opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state but calls for Palestinian self-governance. If says nothing about annihilating Palestinians or about engaging in terror to advance political aims.

Doesn’t matter what they say. Actions speak louder than words.

Ok, so you gave up arging that Likud, a single political party among many in Israel, drives some kind of whole-of-Israel anti-Palestinian, pro-terror, agenda.

Nothing Israel is doing is anything other than determined efforts to retrieve Hamas kidnapping victims while defending its soldiers. Hamas, on the other hand, is attempting genocide, guided by it's own published agenda.

Hamas surrenders, civilians stop dying. Can't get easier to understand than that.

Instead of crying about civilian casualties, focus on why there are such casualties - Hamas. Put some of your energy into asking Hamas to change course. It won't help, of course, but at least you'll be directing your vituperative diatribes to the actors ultimately responsible for every single death in Gaza instead of blaming the victims of Oct. 7 for the consequences of Hamas' poor decisions.

Anonymous wrote:https://x.com/the_andrey_x/status/1945169938332696770

Journalist Andrey X reports on how the IOF collaborates with settler terrorists to launch pogroms against Palestinian villages. The most recent pogrom resulted in the murder of 2 Palestinians, one being an American citizen as well.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Call them whatever you want. It still doesn’t justify their genocide.

True, Hamas' genocidal ambitions are unjustified by anything, despite being enshrined in their founding "Covenant" and couched in Islamic religious language.

Likud charter, dum dum.

What about it? It says peace is a central aim of Israel's policy. It calls for the Palestinians to annul those parts of their charter which call for the destruction of Israel, and to prevent terror against Israel. It opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state but calls for Palestinian self-governance. If says nothing about annihilating Palestinians or about engaging in terror to advance political aims.

Doesn’t matter what they say. Actions speak louder than words.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Call them whatever you want. It still doesn’t justify their genocide.

True, Hamas' genocidal ambitions are unjustified by anything, despite being enshrined in their founding "Covenant" and couched in Islamic religious language.

Likud charter, dum dum.

What about it? It says peace is a central aim of Israel's policy. It calls for the Palestinians to annul those parts of their charter which call for the destruction of Israel, and to prevent terror against Israel. It opposes the establishment of a Palestinian state but calls for Palestinian self-governance. If says nothing about annihilating Palestinians or about engaging in terror to advance political aims.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If Israel doesn’t undertake serious internal reform or cannot be reined-in by world condemnation, we will inevitably approach an inflection point where most of the world’s population of 8+ billion people are going to view Zionists as responsible for and fully deserving of whatever misfortune comes their way. Tough talk aside, Israel is making a massive miscalculation in thinking that it has the ability to withstand what would come next.

Israel is preventing "any misfortune which comes their way" by neutralizing Palestinian terror. So that won't be a problem. Annexing the West Bank is a means towards that end. No terror, no settlements. Sufficient settlements, no terror. Refusing the first option leads to the second option.

Certainly neutralised the six kids waiting for water. “Eyewitnesses said a drone fired a missile at a crowd queuing with empty jerry cans next to a water tanker in al-Nuseirat refugee camp.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0rvxjnvv71o

So what's the root cause? Oct. 7 ring any bells? Release the hostages, surrender. Simple.

Israel had been terrorizing and murdering Palestinian children since European settlers arrived in Palestine in the early 1900s. This is not about 10/8. Its about a bigoted hatred of Palestinians.

Hatred of Palestinians has been well-earned, from 1947 onwards, given their nonstop efforts to eradicate Israel by force. And, anyway, any distaste for Palestinians on Oct 6 didn't translate into any Israelis rampaging into Gaza to rape, murder and kidnap Palestinians. The Palestinians started the current conflict on Oct 7, like so many others they started in years past, and are reaping the same consequences. Some people never learn.

1947, the year the Zionists invaded Palestine by force?

You're thinking of 1947, when the U.N. partition plan for the British Mandate, would have created separate Arab and Jewish states. The Jewish community accepted the plan, the Arabs immediately attacked the new state of Israel, which was formed by Jews already living on the land in question. Jordan and Egypt controlled the remainder; the Palestinians never controlled any of it, never had any legal claim or right to it, and are present-day squatters on it.

Obviously the Arabs wouldn't accept it? Europeans were just randomly taking away territory that they had been living on out of nowhere. Yawn.

It never "belonged" to the Palestinians. "Arab land" in Gaza is a fiction promulgated by stateless people who rejected their opportunity for a state of their own in 1947.

Gaza has variously been occupied and governed by the Canaanites, Israelites, Phoenicians, and so on up to the Ottoman Empire until 1917, and then the British, and then the Egyptians. Israel captured it in the 1967 6-Day War. When have the Palestinians "owned" Gaza? Never. They're squatters, there by sufferance.

Call them whatever you want. It still doesn’t justify their genocide.

True, Hamas' genocidal ambitions are unjustified by anything, despite being enshrined in their founding "Covenant" and couched in Islamic religious language.

Likud charter, dum dum.