Anonymous wrote:There is going to be a LOT of movement as the climate continues to change. How long do we have to turn things around? Or is it already too late, and this is why billionaires are builfing bunkers while elected public officials are neglecting (or being disempowered from the ability) to stabilize a long term strategy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The USA is becoming part of the globalist blob.
Mass migration, throughout the whole of the Western world, is a deliberate ploy to dilute national culture and to transform individual states with their own languages, cultures, customs and architecture into a homogeneous blob.
The reason is as obvious as the communist structures are grey.
Why would anyone protect Melbourne when it looks no different to Berlin?
Why would an Italian fight for Italy when he regards himself as a global citizen rather than as an Italian?
To accomplish this task, globalists need a compliant population. A population that neither knows, nor cares, for their own history.
A population that has bit by bit been stripped bare of all allegiance to country or culture or even family.
The only allegiance that will be left will be to the all powerful global State.
"Deliberate ploy" would require some conscious, organized plan being orchestrated by some specific group. Who?
Never mind, there is no great Machiavellian "who" and it certainly isn't organized.
Take for example migration from the middle east - lots of Syrians and others have flooded into Europe. Why? Assad and the civil war? Sure. But there's a lot more to it. Consider for example that Turkey built massive dams on the Euphrates reducing flow of water into Syria by 40%, compounded by droughts, 2006-2010, crops failing, 75% of farms failing, livestock loss and so on. 300,000 rural Syrians fled to Aleppo and Damascus, huge spike in unemployment, strained infrastructure, 2011 uprising and civil war. Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon also face many similar water issues, as do Yemen and Sudan. This fuels unrest, dispute, displacement and migration.
Your worldview is underinformed, and it wouldn't be so weird and conspiratorial if you actually read more.
There’s different reasons endorsed by different groups. Jews for example prefer very diverse countries where a unified front by white people is impossible. The wealthy only care that the GDP go up so they’re happy to import demand and drive down the cost of labor. Liberals hate whites and want them replaced just for the sake of. Immigrants want to gather more power for their own ethnic bloc. The converging interests of these disparate groups is the only thing holding their coalition together; they can only survive as a political body because they hate white people and nations so much.
Anonymous wrote:The USA is becoming part of the globalist blob.
Mass migration, throughout the whole of the Western world, is a deliberate ploy to dilute national culture and to transform individual states with their own languages, cultures, customs and architecture into a homogeneous blob.
The reason is as obvious as the communist structures are grey.
Why would anyone protect Melbourne when it looks no different to Berlin?
Why would an Italian fight for Italy when he regards himself as a global citizen rather than as an Italian?
To accomplish this task, globalists need a compliant population. A population that neither knows, nor cares, for their own history.
A population that has bit by bit been stripped bare of all allegiance to country or culture or even family.
The only allegiance that will be left will be to the all powerful global State.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The USA is becoming part of the globalist blob.
Mass migration, throughout the whole of the Western world, is a deliberate ploy to dilute national culture and to transform individual states with their own languages, cultures, customs and architecture into a homogeneous blob.
The reason is as obvious as the communist structures are grey.
Why would anyone protect Melbourne when it looks no different to Berlin?
Why would an Italian fight for Italy when he regards himself as a global citizen rather than as an Italian?
To accomplish this task, globalists need a compliant population. A population that neither knows, nor cares, for their own history.
A population that has bit by bit been stripped bare of all allegiance to country or culture or even family.
The only allegiance that will be left will be to the all powerful global State.
"Deliberate ploy" would require some conscious, organized plan being orchestrated by some specific group. Who?
Never mind, there is no great Machiavellian "who" and it certainly isn't organized.
Take for example migration from the middle east - lots of Syrians and others have flooded into Europe. Why? Assad and the civil war? Sure. But there's a lot more to it. Consider for example that Turkey built massive dams on the Euphrates reducing flow of water into Syria by 40%, compounded by droughts, 2006-2010, crops failing, 75% of farms failing, livestock loss and so on. 300,000 rural Syrians fled to Aleppo and Damascus, huge spike in unemployment, strained infrastructure, 2011 uprising and civil war. Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon also face many similar water issues, as do Yemen and Sudan. This fuels unrest, dispute, displacement and migration.
Your worldview is underinformed, and it wouldn't be so weird and conspiratorial if you actually read more.
Anonymous wrote:What do you think it will be like in the country for the next decade? Climate deniers, health care vaccine deniers, data deniers. Add the type of deniers you have seen or you predict will emerge within the next 10 years. People from other countries and/or if you have lived extensively elsewhere : can you draw correlations to what you have seen in a different country, and if you have kids, do you advise your kid to move to the country from where you moved to the US even if the kid has never visited or lived in that country? Should people try to move to ...I don't know ...Mars?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Straight to Hell in a free fall.
Wrong. The good people of this country will put the nightmarish Trump/Biden years in the rear view mirror and we'll move forward to a better place together with love and compassion for all of our fellow Americans who were duped into thinking 80 year old people should be POTUS.
With all the both-sidesing that happens in these threads, I hope people can see the difference between 2020 Biden and 2024 Biden. 2020 Biden took part in a primary and earned the nomination. While the pandemic limited his public appearances, he was sharp when he needed to be (debating Trump, for example). 2024 Biden screwed us all.
Trump, on the other hand, has always been the same guy.
…and Biden at his worst was better than Trump ever was. As a human.
True but anyone with an IQ over 90 knows dang well neither of those elderly clowns should have ever occupied The White House.
Quit insulting old people. Americans are so ageist.
Some of the youngest people in politics are the most unhinged, ignorant, and incompetent.
I'm old and I'm old enough to have known enough elderly people to know that elderly people can't adequately perform the very demanding duties of POTUS 24/7/365. This isn't ageism. This is common sense for those of us who understand how important and demanding the POTUS position is. Find a brain, will ya?
Well, you sound like an adolescent.
Says the person who thought it was wise to vote for a 78 year old leader of the free world. lol
There's a difference between voting for a 78-year-old career politician and a 78-year-old wannabe dictator.
78 is the new 68, ok? It's more about mental and physical fitness than number. A 60 year old with undetected early onset dementia is not going to perform any better than a 70+ mentally fit person.
Both are too old.
"The full retirement age for Social Security benefits in the USA varies based on your birth year. It's 67 for those born in 1960 or later, but it was previously 65 and has been gradually increasing. For those born between 1943 and 1954, the full retirement age is 66. Individuals can choose to start receiving benefits as early as age 62, but this results in a reduced monthly benefit. Delaying retirement past the full retirement age results in a higher monthly benefit, up to age 70."
No one over 70. Please. Only someone who has not started receiving SS benefits.
Agree. Where was all of this common sense before Trump and Biden were nominated?
Um that blame can be placed on spineless gop, remember the ones who could have prevented this, after J6? They had a chance to. And look at those same people now aiding and abetting. God bless J6 survivors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Straight to Hell in a free fall.
Wrong. The good people of this country will put the nightmarish Trump/Biden years in the rear view mirror and we'll move forward to a better place together with love and compassion for all of our fellow Americans who were duped into thinking 80 year old people should be POTUS.
With all the both-sidesing that happens in these threads, I hope people can see the difference between 2020 Biden and 2024 Biden. 2020 Biden took part in a primary and earned the nomination. While the pandemic limited his public appearances, he was sharp when he needed to be (debating Trump, for example). 2024 Biden screwed us all.
Trump, on the other hand, has always been the same guy.
…and Biden at his worst was better than Trump ever was. As a human.
True but anyone with an IQ over 90 knows dang well neither of those elderly clowns should have ever occupied The White House.
Quit insulting old people. Americans are so ageist.
Some of the youngest people in politics are the most unhinged, ignorant, and incompetent.
I'm old and I'm old enough to have known enough elderly people to know that elderly people can't adequately perform the very demanding duties of POTUS 24/7/365. This isn't ageism. This is common sense for those of us who understand how important and demanding the POTUS position is. Find a brain, will ya?
Well, you sound like an adolescent.
Says the person who thought it was wise to vote for a 78 year old leader of the free world. lol
There's a difference between voting for a 78-year-old career politician and a 78-year-old wannabe dictator.
78 is the new 68, ok? It's more about mental and physical fitness than number. A 60 year old with undetected early onset dementia is not going to perform any better than a 70+ mentally fit person.
Both are too old.
"The full retirement age for Social Security benefits in the USA varies based on your birth year. It's 67 for those born in 1960 or later, but it was previously 65 and has been gradually increasing. For those born between 1943 and 1954, the full retirement age is 66. Individuals can choose to start receiving benefits as early as age 62, but this results in a reduced monthly benefit. Delaying retirement past the full retirement age results in a higher monthly benefit, up to age 70."
No one over 70. Please. Only someone who has not started receiving SS benefits.
Agree. Where was all of this common sense before Trump and Biden were nominated?
Anonymous wrote:The USA is becoming part of the globalist blob.
Mass migration, throughout the whole of the Western world, is a deliberate ploy to dilute national culture and to transform individual states with their own languages, cultures, customs and architecture into a homogeneous blob.
The reason is as obvious as the communist structures are grey.
Why would anyone protect Melbourne when it looks no different to Berlin?
Why would an Italian fight for Italy when he regards himself as a global citizen rather than as an Italian?
To accomplish this task, globalists need a compliant population. A population that neither knows, nor cares, for their own history.
A population that has bit by bit been stripped bare of all allegiance to country or culture or even family.
The only allegiance that will be left will be to the all powerful global State.
Anonymous wrote:The USA is becoming part of the globalist blob.
Mass migration, throughout the whole of the Western world, is a deliberate ploy to dilute national culture and to transform individual states with their own languages, cultures, customs and architecture into a homogeneous blob.
The reason is as obvious as the communist structures are grey.
Why would anyone protect Melbourne when it looks no different to Berlin?
Why would an Italian fight for Italy when he regards himself as a global citizen rather than as an Italian?
To accomplish this task, globalists need a compliant population. A population that neither knows, nor cares, for their own history.
A population that has bit by bit been stripped bare of all allegiance to country or culture or even family.
The only allegiance that will be left will be to the all powerful global State.
Anonymous wrote:Just leave already. Please. ASAP.