Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what names are being floated as a successor. I’ve heard Cucinelli but he is a politician, not an educator. Are there other names?
I don’t think him not being an educator would be an impediment.
So you’d support a CEO that had never worked for a corporation if your stocks depended on it?
Running a large university is similar to being a CEO. Many academics do, unfortunately, not have that type of experience. Mitch Daniels was not an academic before he became president of Purdue.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what names are being floated as a successor. I’ve heard Cucinelli but he is a politician, not an educator. Are there other names?
I don’t think him not being an educator would be an impediment.
So you’d support a CEO that had never worked for a corporation if your stocks depended on it?
Anonymous wrote:You have to follow right? Just like we had to follow Biden’s stuff so yeah if he is choosing not to follow or finding ways to avoid following then he needs to go. If staff doesn’t want to be there then they are free to leave but doubtful. So many academics need jobs so I am sure many would love to teach there.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what names are being floated as a successor. I’ve heard Cucinelli but he is a politician, not an educator. Are there other names?
Look at what happened at UF. It’s stunning UVA might be going down that path.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been following the story. Whether you agree or not was UVA going against federal mandate to disable DEI? If they were trying to go around then this is not good. You don’t get to decide what laws you want to follow
based on your feelings. If they were complying then he should not step down. I am not sure what the answer was? He seemed well liked and it is a good school. Surely he would understand that he cannot create admissions based on his personal feelings? Is there something more here?
Not according to the Orange Guy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t think legacy admissions will come back but there does appear to be two admissions standards. 4.5/1450+ SAT for one group of kids and 4.1/1300+ SAT or T.O. for another. And Scattergrams now identify major so easy to link up who is who with IG posts. This is coming from a mid tier private.
+1000 This is what frustrates those of us with high stats kids that are getting WL in state at UVA.
Anonymous wrote:I am glad my current UVA student was there under Jim Ryan’s leadership at least for some time. Fingers crossed the next president doesn’t mess things up.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I have been following the story. Whether you agree or not was UVA going against federal mandate to disable DEI? If they were trying to go around then this is not good. You don’t get to decide what laws you want to follow
based on your feelings. If they were complying then he should not step down. I am not sure what the answer was? He seemed well liked and it is a good school. Surely he would understand that he cannot create admissions based on his personal feelings? Is there something more here?
Something tells me the civil rights leaders FELT the Jim Crow Laws were unjust, and tbey did something about it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what names are being floated as a successor. I’ve heard Cucinelli but he is a politician, not an educator. Are there other names?
I don’t think him not being an educator would be an impediment.
So you’d support a CEO that had never worked for a corporation if your stocks depended on it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what names are being floated as a successor. I’ve heard Cucinelli but he is a politician, not an educator. Are there other names?
I don’t think him not being an educator would be an impediment.
Anonymous wrote:I have been following the story. Whether you agree or not was UVA going against federal mandate to disable DEI? If they were trying to go around then this is not good. You don’t get to decide what laws you want to follow
based on your feelings. If they were complying then he should not step down. I am not sure what the answer was? He seemed well liked and it is a good school. Surely he would understand that he cannot create admissions based on his personal feelings? Is there something more here?
Anonymous wrote:I have been following the story. Whether you agree or not was UVA going against federal mandate to disable DEI? If they were trying to go around then this is not good. You don’t get to decide what laws you want to follow
based on your feelings. If they were complying then he should not step down. I am not sure what the answer was? He seemed well liked and it is a good school. Surely he would understand that he cannot create admissions based on his personal feelings? Is there something more here?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what names are being floated as a successor. I’ve heard Cucinelli but he is a politician, not an educator. Are there other names?
I don’t think him not being an educator would be an impediment.