Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:That's what interviews should be for, rather than just alumni engagement.Anonymous wrote:It would be like Stuyvesant, which yes is completely meritocratic, but soft skills matter in the work place too.
Soft skills are important, but judging soft skills based on a 30 minute interview often boils down to "Is this person like me?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I would look exactly like it does now, with students being chosen on the merits of criteria selected by the choosers.
Pretty much the way everything is decided.
Exactly.
And in a country where Pete Hegseth and RFK Jr can be the heads of government functions and make decisions impacting millions, I don't want to hear sh*t about meritocracy.
Joe, Kamala, Mayor Peteā¦some real heavyweights.
This is a joke, right?