Anonymous wrote:This year I’m on the hiring team as the senior/director person in our org’s entry level (consulting, political, policy type shop)…
and one thing I’ve noticed is the boys we are receiving from t20s are not good (on paper or even the few we’ve given interviews to just to get some boys in the hiring pipeline.) the boy interviews have been disasters so far
Granted we don’t get the top boys who go to more prestigious firms, or the stem boys, but the median liberal arts
/social science boys we see in our applicant pool vs the girls is night and day.
The girls even make pro-sports small talk with me better than the boys!
Btw these are all private college t20:t30 class of 2024 or 2025 grads
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here
Interviewed a boy from Penn today
We wanted to hang up in the middle of the interview but couldn’t since he interned in a senate office we’re friends with.
The amount of “likes” and “umm” and even a a random “like awesome”
After him we interviewed a girl from vassar and her vocabulary, cadence, tone….it was akin to being in the jungle observing two completely different species
Smart boys don’t go into politics or want to live in DC. I mean, come on.
Then what are the smartest boys doing? I mean the top 10%. Not all of them are going into finance. I’d say at least a few go into politics/law.
The smartest boys are starting their own tech start ups.
Next up is finance and law, maybe medicine.
The end.
My kid at a top state school (he had top stats as well) is excellent at STEM. He interviewed at quant funds where it is purely techical and he did great and interned there. He also got funding for his startup. He has a girlfriend who is very personable and driven so I think he is doing just fine despite having average social skills. He is now taking personal coaching to pitch to investors, hitting the gym and reading up on sports to make small talk. He was very immature in HS compared to his sister. His ambition and drive which kicked in during college. I think for boys it just takes time but society does not seem to have patience when it comes to boys.
This is pathetic.
Why is it pathetic to work on things to improve oneself. This whole thread is about boys not having good social skills and presence. Some people have to take tutoring in math and others in presenting or pitching.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here
Interviewed a boy from Penn today
We wanted to hang up in the middle of the interview but couldn’t since he interned in a senate office we’re friends with.
The amount of “likes” and “umm” and even a a random “like awesome”
After him we interviewed a girl from vassar and her vocabulary, cadence, tone….it was akin to being in the jungle observing two completely different species
Smart boys don’t go into politics or want to live in DC. I mean, come on.
Then what are the smartest boys doing? I mean the top 10%. Not all of them are going into finance. I’d say at least a few go into politics/law.
The smartest boys are starting their own tech start ups.
Next up is finance and law, maybe medicine.
The end.
My kid at a top state school (he had top stats as well) is excellent at STEM. He interviewed at quant funds where it is purely techical and he did great and interned there. He also got funding for his startup. He has a girlfriend who is very personable and driven so I think he is doing just fine despite having average social skills. He is now taking personal coaching to pitch to investors, hitting the gym and reading up on sports to make small talk. He was very immature in HS compared to his sister. His ambition and drive which kicked in during college. I think for boys it just takes time but society does not seem to have patience when it comes to boys.
This is my DS. Late bloomer. Got some drive in college, and now headed to a quant firm for internship this summer (two quant firm , one FAANG , and two other big tech offers). He interviews very well.
DS has always been academically "gifted", but lacked drive in HS so didn't go to a T10, but his stats were super high.
What year is he (and age) and what changed in college? Is in the software side? I feel my DS is also a late bloomer too.
Anonymous wrote:This year I’m on the hiring team as the senior/director person in our org’s entry level (consulting, political, policy type shop)…
and one thing I’ve noticed is the boys we are receiving from t20s are not good (on paper or even the few we’ve given interviews to just to get some boys in the hiring pipeline.) the boy interviews have been disasters so far
Granted we don’t get the top boys who go to more prestigious firms, or the stem boys, but the median liberal arts
/social science boys we see in our applicant pool vs the girls is night and day.
The girls even make pro-sports small talk with me better than the boys!
Btw these are all private college t20:t30 class of 2024 or 2025 grads
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here
Interviewed a boy from Penn today
We wanted to hang up in the middle of the interview but couldn’t since he interned in a senate office we’re friends with.
The amount of “likes” and “umm” and even a a random “like awesome”
After him we interviewed a girl from vassar and her vocabulary, cadence, tone….it was akin to being in the jungle observing two completely different species
Smart boys don’t go into politics or want to live in DC. I mean, come on.
Then what are the smartest boys doing? I mean the top 10%. Not all of them are going into finance. I’d say at least a few go into politics/law.
The smartest boys are starting their own tech start ups.
Next up is finance and law, maybe medicine.
The end.
My kid at a top state school (he had top stats as well) is excellent at STEM. He interviewed at quant funds where it is purely techical and he did great and interned there. He also got funding for his startup. He has a girlfriend who is very personable and driven so I think he is doing just fine despite having average social skills. He is now taking personal coaching to pitch to investors, hitting the gym and reading up on sports to make small talk. He was very immature in HS compared to his sister. His ambition and drive which kicked in during college. I think for boys it just takes time but society does not seem to have patience when it comes to boys.
This is pathetic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This is probably a different post but I was thinking recently the college applications really don’t reflect a lot of important social skills, and that may show up more with the boys.
This is off point but as an example, my son has had a girlfriend for over a year. It obviously takes some time that he could otherwise be filling with extracurrriculars for his college applications. But, he’s developing real skills in treating women with respect and kindness, considering the needs of others, etc. He interacts well with her parents and has developed something of a bond with her dad, who is from a different culture. These all seem like solid life skills to me that will probably make him a better college citizen and employee some day. But the colleges are filtering for people who don’t have these life experiences, because they have up this social time to instead start a pointless non profit or win some prize at a competition for something you’ll never use. I’m not really throwing shade at those kids — that was my older kid and that’s a fine way to be. But the colleges are definitely not capturing the real breadth of skills we might want out future citizens to have.
Really, you just list having a girlfriend for over a year as a major achievement, comparable with being involved in a non profit or winning a competition. Did you run out of reasons to be proud of your son? True that some nonprofits are fake, competitions might not be relevant, but let’s not kid ourselves here, so is having a girlfriend, which most kids do, while starting a nonprofit and winning a competition is objectively more rare and requires more effort than making out with a girl.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op here
Interviewed a boy from Penn today
We wanted to hang up in the middle of the interview but couldn’t since he interned in a senate office we’re friends with.
The amount of “likes” and “umm” and even a a random “like awesome”
After him we interviewed a girl from vassar and her vocabulary, cadence, tone….it was akin to being in the jungle observing two completely different species
Smart boys don’t go into politics or want to live in DC. I mean, come on.
Then what are the smartest boys doing? I mean the top 10%. Not all of them are going into finance. I’d say at least a few go into politics/law.
The smartest boys are starting their own tech start ups.
Next up is finance and law, maybe medicine.
The end.
My kid at a top state school (he had top stats as well) is excellent at STEM. He interviewed at quant funds where it is purely techical and he did great and interned there. He also got funding for his startup. He has a girlfriend who is very personable and driven so I think he is doing just fine despite having average social skills. He is now taking personal coaching to pitch to investors, hitting the gym and reading up on sports to make small talk. He was very immature in HS compared to his sister. His ambition and drive which kicked in during college. I think for boys it just takes time but society does not seem to have patience when it comes to boys.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This year I’m on the hiring team as the senior/director person in our org’s entry level (consulting, political, policy type shop)…
and one thing I’ve noticed is the boys we are receiving from t20s are not good (on paper or even the few we’ve given interviews to just to get some boys in the hiring pipeline.) the boy interviews have been disasters so far
Granted we don’t get the top boys who go to more prestigious firms, or the stem boys, but the median liberal arts
/social science boys we see in our applicant pool vs the girls is night and day.
The girls even make pro-sports small talk with me better than the boys!
Btw these are all private college t20:t30 class of 2024 or 2025 grads
Why is it that boys aren't at the same level do you think? Has anything changed since first posting this discussion?