Anonymous wrote:OP here. Ugh. I swore to myself that my 9:43 post would be my last on this thread, but here I am.
Kid took the classes that they wanted, did the ECs that they wanted, didn't grind much at all, and is naturally very bright and high achieving with quirky interests. They aren't going to fit some sort of "package" and have no interest whatsoever in trying to create a hook out of the cancer or any hobbies.
If anything, this entire thread has encouraged us to not bother "playing the game." I'm not even sure that my kid would want to be at a school filled with these overly packaged kids. I knew admissions were holistic, but I didn't realize just how holistic and over-the-top everything has become.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The following may seem crass. I’m sorry.
I think that most people posting missed the part about you having cancer.
Maybe that can actually be a hook and help your DC explain away any weakness in ECs.
What’s your DC’s “story”? DC is helping to take care of Mom.
My guess is that your DC writes well, tha the teachers love your DC, and that your DC may do better at T20 schools with great aid than the jerks here think because your DC is the real thing, not the product of tutoring.
Is this something you made up?
Honest opinions = being a jerk?
It is not crass. It is part of the kid's personal story and narrative. It shaped them into who they are today and will give a full picture to the admissions officers.
My kid, a slightly above average, but not exceptional student, got into a T20 school, incorporating into his essays how his father's chronic condition impacted his life. Not a sob story, just matter of fact telling of how he helped take care of his dad etc... He is a kind, empathetic individual and I believe his teachers' LORs also reflected how they appreciated him.
Except you said kid’s story is helping to care for mom. You made that up. OP never said one word about kid helping mom or mom even needing help.
Anonymous wrote:OP here. Ugh. I swore to myself that my 9:43 post would be my last on this thread, but here I am.
Kid took the classes that they wanted, did the ECs that they wanted, didn't grind much at all, and is naturally very bright and high achieving with quirky interests. They aren't going to fit some sort of "package" and have no interest whatsoever in trying to create a hook out of the cancer or any hobbies.
If anything, this entire thread has encouraged us to not bother "playing the game." I'm not even sure that my kid would want to be at a school filled with these overly packaged kids. I knew admissions were holistic, but I didn't realize just how holistic and over-the-top everything has become.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be sure to check out the elite publics - UCLA, UCB, U Mich, UVA, etc., as these schools seem to continue to value traditional measures of academic success over the process of packaging a kid as a historic costume designer.
Hahaha. Best comment of the thread. A new EC…
The fact that these poor kids have to grind, take top rigor, max out ECs and then have to package it all up tied to a FREAKING MAJOR has to stop. The top liberal arts ivies used to be places where kids could find themselves. It's all too much and causing insane burnout. I am past this process with my two, but if I had a third I would suggest not even "playing the game."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Be sure to check out the elite publics - UCLA, UCB, U Mich, UVA, etc., as these schools seem to continue to value traditional measures of academic success over the process of packaging a kid as a historic costume designer.
Hahaha. Best comment of the thread. A new EC…
Anonymous wrote:OP here once again. My mind is blown that a 99.9th percentile ACT, NMSF, 10+ APs with mostly 5s, and a nearly perfect GPA are a dime a dozen and not something that would interest T20 schools. I guess you learn something every day.
Anonymous wrote:Why not try for the top-- check the NPC for MIT, Bryn Mawr (if a girl), Harvard-- it's possible that you will be able to afford it. And your income would be considered low enough that the app fees are waived.
Even if your kid doesn't get in, the time spent working on the essays, etc. can be very worthwhile. Why not try? That way you'll not consider, "what if?"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here once again. My mind is blown that a 99.9th percentile ACT, NMSF, 10+ APs with mostly 5s, and a nearly perfect GPA are a dime a dozen and not something that would interest T20 schools. I guess you learn something every day.
Well, they probably aren't a dime a dozen in Idaho or Wyoming or Montana, but in metro DC (or metro NYC, metro SF, etc), there are many. Sorry to enlighten you to the real world out here.
define "many"? People act like there are thousands of them in this area, there are not. There are only like thousands in the country that have a 1570+ alone, once you start adding in nmsf, ap, etc it whittles down further and further.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The following may seem crass. I’m sorry.
I think that most people posting missed the part about you having cancer.
Maybe that can actually be a hook and help your DC explain away any weakness in ECs.
What’s your DC’s “story”? DC is helping to take care of Mom.
My guess is that your DC writes well, tha the teachers love your DC, and that your DC may do better at T20 schools with great aid than the jerks here think because your DC is the real thing, not the product of tutoring.
Is this something you made up?
Honest opinions = being a jerk?
It is not crass. It is part of the kid's personal story and narrative. It shaped them into who they are today and will give a full picture to the admissions officers.
My kid, a slightly above average, but not exceptional student, got into a T20 school, incorporating into his essays how his father's chronic condition impacted his life. Not a sob story, just matter of fact telling of how he helped take care of his dad etc... He is a kind, empathetic individual and I believe his teachers' LORs also reflected how they appreciated him.
Anonymous wrote:He has nothing to offer the T10 or Ivies so I would water your money on Duke or the like.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here once again. My mind is blown that a 99.9th percentile ACT, NMSF, 10+ APs with mostly 5s, and a nearly perfect GPA are a dime a dozen and not something that would interest T20 schools. I guess you learn something every day.
My mind is blown that you haven’t done any tire kicking to realize the reality that these types of kids are incredibly common in this country? Talk about self centered.
Not OP but jeez!stop being so snotty!
College is a weird weird world now and so 100% different from when all of us parents applied that unless you have started to spend time spots like this to realize the outcomes for high stats kids and to hear about how people “cultivate” these ridiculous “spiky” profiles for their kids, you will not assume either is the case. People just do not realize how much things have changed from when we all were applying.
OP is a donut hole family and is just starting to do research now at the 11th hour. Snark is warranted. Not sure how old you are but it’s not dramatically different from when I went through the process.
Did you read that OP has been going through cancer treatment for the last 5 years?? What is wrong with you??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP here once again. My mind is blown that a 99.9th percentile ACT, NMSF, 10+ APs with mostly 5s, and a nearly perfect GPA are a dime a dozen and not something that would interest T20 schools. I guess you learn something every day.
Well, they probably aren't a dime a dozen in Idaho or Wyoming or Montana, but in metro DC (or metro NYC, metro SF, etc), there are many. Sorry to enlighten you to the real world out here.