Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

Then why are you giving her a pass on ignoring the lawful order to get out of the car?

Because the legality of that order is in dispute. ICE claims they didn't need a warrant for a public arrest, but Berrios's attorney argues her rights were violated without showing one.

As pointed out, you do not need a warrant to pull over a car, and once pulled over you do not have the right to disobey an order to get out of the vehicle. There is zero need for a warrant to remove her from the car.

Pulling a car over is still considered a detention subject to the 4th ammendment. You do need probable cause of a crime or primary driving offense to pull over a car. What was the reason for the traffic stop?

Not correct. A lower standard called "reasonable suspicion" is sufficient for initiating a traffic stop. Reasonable suspicion means the officer has a reasonable basis to suspect a crime has been or is about to be committed. The fact that she’s illegal means she’s currently committing a crime. The stop is legal. She broke the law it’s not that hard.

Federal law enforcement officers have the authority to pull over someone that is presenting a threat to the public. Whether or not this person was presenting a threat to the public is matter for debate. It's all a mess created by our two recent awful presidents.

ICE can pull a vehicle over if they have reasonable suspicion it contains undocumented people. They knew she was undocumented. They had the right to pull her over, and if ordered, she needs to get out of the car. This is on her.

If you don’t want to believe people here, take it from an immigration law firm.

https://www.downeybrand.com/legal-alerts/ice-traffic-stops-now-what/

What was their reasonable suspicion that the car was operated by the suspected driver? Can’t go just on appearances.

Cruz Berrios tells WJZ she believes ICE agents had been after her mother, as they previously showed up at their home in Westminster twice but were denied entry both times. During both incidents, Berrios requested that they present a warrant. Eventually, the agents left, according to Cruz Berrios.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

Then why are you giving her a pass on ignoring the lawful order to get out of the car?

Because the legality of that order is in dispute. ICE claims they didn't need a warrant for a public arrest, but Berrios's attorney argues her rights were violated without showing one.

As pointed out, you do not need a warrant to pull over a car, and once pulled over you do not have the right to disobey an order to get out of the vehicle. There is zero need for a warrant to remove her from the car.

Pulling a car over is still considered a detention subject to the 4th ammendment. You do need probable cause of a crime or primary driving offense to pull over a car. What was the reason for the traffic stop?

Not correct. A lower standard called "reasonable suspicion" is sufficient for initiating a traffic stop. Reasonable suspicion means the officer has a reasonable basis to suspect a crime has been or is about to be committed. The fact that she’s illegal means she’s currently committing a crime. The stop is legal. She broke the law it’s not that hard.

Federal law enforcement officers have the authority to pull over someone that is presenting a threat to the public. Whether or not this person was presenting a threat to the public is matter for debate. It's all a mess created by our two recent awful presidents.

ICE can pull a vehicle over if they have reasonable suspicion it contains undocumented people. They knew she was undocumented. They had the right to pull her over, and if ordered, she needs to get out of the car. This is on her.

If you don’t want to believe people here, take it from an immigration law firm.

https://www.downeybrand.com/legal-alerts/ice-traffic-stops-now-what/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

Then why are you giving her a pass on ignoring the lawful order to get out of the car?

Because the legality of that order is in dispute. ICE claims they didn't need a warrant for a public arrest, but Berrios's attorney argues her rights were violated without showing one.

As pointed out, you do not need a warrant to pull over a car, and once pulled over you do not have the right to disobey an order to get out of the vehicle. There is zero need for a warrant to remove her from the car.

Pulling a car over is still considered a detention subject to the 4th ammendment. You do need probable cause of a crime or primary driving offense to pull over a car. What was the reason for the traffic stop?

Not correct. A lower standard called "reasonable suspicion" is sufficient for initiating a traffic stop. Reasonable suspicion means the officer has a reasonable basis to suspect a crime has been or is about to be committed. The fact that she’s illegal means she’s currently committing a crime. The stop is legal. She broke the law it’s not that hard.

Reasonable articulable suspicion (RAS) is the actual term. ICE doesn’t do traffic stops. The whole thing isn’t legal. They have no RAS here of a crime.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

Then why are you giving her a pass on ignoring the lawful order to get out of the car?

Because the legality of that order is in dispute. ICE claims they didn't need a warrant for a public arrest, but Berrios's attorney argues her rights were violated without showing one.

As pointed out, you do not need a warrant to pull over a car, and once pulled over you do not have the right to disobey an order to get out of the vehicle. There is zero need for a warrant to remove her from the car.

Pulling a car over is still considered a detention subject to the 4th ammendment. You do need probable cause of a crime or primary driving offense to pull over a car. What was the reason for the traffic stop?

Not correct. A lower standard called "reasonable suspicion" is sufficient for initiating a traffic stop. Reasonable suspicion means the officer has a reasonable basis to suspect a crime has been or is about to be committed. The fact that she’s illegal means she’s currently committing a crime. The stop is legal. She broke the law it’s not that hard.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

Then why are you giving her a pass on ignoring the lawful order to get out of the car?

Because the legality of that order is in dispute. ICE claims they didn't need a warrant for a public arrest, but Berrios's attorney argues her rights were violated without showing one.

As pointed out, you do not need a warrant to pull over a car, and once pulled over you do not have the right to disobey an order to get out of the vehicle. There is zero need for a warrant to remove her from the car.

Pulling a car over is still considered a detention subject to the 4th ammendment. You do need probable cause of a crime or primary driving offense to pull over a car. What was the reason for the traffic stop?

Not correct. A lower standard called "reasonable suspicion" is sufficient for initiating a traffic stop. Reasonable suspicion means the officer has a reasonable basis to suspect a crime has been or is about to be committed. The fact that she’s illegal means she’s currently committing a crime. The stop is legal. She broke the law it’s not that hard.

Federal law enforcement officers have the authority to pull over someone that is presenting a threat to the public. Whether or not this person was presenting a threat to the public is matter for debate. It's all a mess created by our two recent awful presidents.

ICE can pull a vehicle over if they have reasonable suspicion it contains undocumented people. They knew she was undocumented. They had the right to pull her over, and if ordered, she needs to get out of the car. This is on her.

If you don’t want to believe people here, take it from an immigration law firm.

https://www.downeybrand.com/legal-alerts/ice-traffic-stops-now-what/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

Then why are you giving her a pass on ignoring the lawful order to get out of the car?

Because the legality of that order is in dispute. ICE claims they didn't need a warrant for a public arrest, but Berrios's attorney argues her rights were violated without showing one.

As pointed out, you do not need a warrant to pull over a car, and once pulled over you do not have the right to disobey an order to get out of the vehicle. There is zero need for a warrant to remove her from the car.

Pulling a car over is still considered a detention subject to the 4th ammendment. You do need probable cause of a crime or primary driving offense to pull over a car. What was the reason for the traffic stop?

Not correct. A lower standard called "reasonable suspicion" is sufficient for initiating a traffic stop. Reasonable suspicion means the officer has a reasonable basis to suspect a crime has been or is about to be committed. The fact that she’s illegal means she’s currently committing a crime. The stop is legal. She broke the law it’s not that hard.

Federal law enforcement officers have the authority to pull over someone that is presenting a threat to the public. Whether or not this person was presenting a threat to the public is matter for debate. It's all a mess created by our two recent awful presidents.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

Then why are you giving her a pass on ignoring the lawful order to get out of the car?

Because the legality of that order is in dispute. ICE claims they didn't need a warrant for a public arrest, but Berrios's attorney argues her rights were violated without showing one.

As pointed out, you do not need a warrant to pull over a car, and once pulled over you do not have the right to disobey an order to get out of the vehicle. There is zero need for a warrant to remove her from the car.

Pulling a car over is still considered a detention subject to the 4th ammendment. You do need probable cause of a crime or primary driving offense to pull over a car. What was the reason for the traffic stop?

Not correct. A lower standard called "reasonable suspicion" is sufficient for initiating a traffic stop. Reasonable suspicion means the officer has a reasonable basis to suspect a crime has been or is about to be committed. The fact that she’s illegal means she’s currently committing a crime. The stop is legal. She broke the law it’s not that hard.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

Then why are you giving her a pass on ignoring the lawful order to get out of the car?

Because the legality of that order is in dispute. ICE claims they didn't need a warrant for a public arrest, but Berrios's attorney argues her rights were violated without showing one.

As pointed out, you do not need a warrant to pull over a car, and once pulled over you do not have the right to disobey an order to get out of the vehicle. There is zero need for a warrant to remove her from the car.

Pulling a car over is still considered a detention subject to the 4th ammendment. You do need probable cause of a crime or primary driving offense to pull over a car. What was the reason for the traffic stop?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

I CAN blame democrats for wa tering down the voter rolls with illegal aliens and an unpopular nutty agenda in a bid to keep power.

Prove the bolded, liar.

There’s no conclusive evidence of widespread illegal voting by noncitizens in the last U.S. election. Studies, like one from the Brennan Center, found only about 30 suspected cases out of 23.5 million votes in There’s no conclusive evidence of widespread illegal voting by noncitizens in the last U.S. election. Studies, like one from the Brennan Center, found only about 30 suspected cases out of 23.5 million votes in 2016, a rate of 0.0001%.

DOGE's look through Social Security has found more than 30. At what point does the problem become 'widespread'?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

I CAN blame democrats for wa tering down the voter rolls with illegal aliens and an unpopular nutty agenda in a bid to keep power.

Prove the bolded, liar.

There’s no conclusive evidence of widespread illegal voting by noncitizens in the last U.S. election. Studies, like one from the Brennan Center, found only about 30 suspected cases out of 23.5 million votes in There’s no conclusive evidence of widespread illegal voting by noncitizens in the last U.S. election. Studies, like one from the Brennan Center, found only about 30 suspected cases out of 23.5 million votes in 2016, a rate of 0.0001%.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.

I CAN blame democrats for wa tering down the voter rolls with illegal aliens and an unpopular nutty agenda in a bid to keep power.

Prove the bolded, liar.

There’s no conclusive evidence of widespread illegal voting by noncitizens in the last U.S. election. Studies, like one from the Brennan Center, found only about 30 suspected cases out of 23.5 million votes in There’s no conclusive evidence of widespread illegal voting by noncitizens in the last U.S. election. Studies, like one from the Brennan Center, found only about 30 suspected cases out of 23.5 million votes in 2016, a rate of 0.0001%.

Anonymous wrote:

+10000 Most of us Americans would be fleeing these South and Central American countries for the same reasons these asylum seekers are. Sure, there are bad apples mixed in but we know 90% of them are decent people seeking a better life.

Pea-brained "Republicans" and "Democrats" always want to point the finger across the aisle as opposed to realizing and acknowledging the long standing failures to reform our immigration laws by politicians of both of our two awful major political parties

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^ Being here illegally makes you a criminal, so by default they all have a criminal record. Why is that hard to acknowledge?

Did you even read the article? The woman in this story had legal status.

She entered illegally but “In February 2017, Berrios was released from custody under the ICE Alternatives to Detention Program. The program allows migrants to continue living in the U.S. as they move forward with immigration court proceedings.

Her attorney says her removal proceeding was dropped in 2023, and Berrios filed an affirmative asylum application, which is still pending now. She also has retained an employment authorization card, allowing her to work while her application is reviewed.”

This is the problem with phony asylum status that Biden made up for backdoor immigration. She was undocumented then got caught, but then convientlty used the asylum status to stay. No that it's been determined those status is phoney and rescinded she needs to go back. Why are people so shocked when asylum ends but not when by a wave a magic wand it was created, it can be removed the same get over it.

That “phony asylum system” was created by congress and has been the law of the land for decades. It needs to be changed by congress. You can’t blame desperate people for using existing rules to stay in the country. The point still stands that at the time of the encounter with iCE agents in the video, she was legally here and had work authorization, whether you like it or not. We are a country of laws.