Anonymous wrote:Here's the thing though. You cannot have the rich or even the ok-off with a high standard of living without the poor and exploited living hand to mouth. Your good fortune means someone somewhere is paying the price for that directly or indirectly, whether you are aware of that or not.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The alvery analogy I used was not meant to impy that I thought Chinese workers were slaves.
It was just an analogy to indicate that even though the workers might say things are better than they were before, that doesn't mean much if "before" was really crappy, and now is just a little bit crappy.
Do you buy fruit and vegetables at the grocery story? Most of those who work on these US farms are migrant workers, some children as young as 6 yrs old picking berries, but I'm willing to bet you buy and consume blueberries, etc. Why aren't you ranting against child labor and the conditions of migrant parents living in shacks?
Too many PP's with a double standard on this thread.
Why do you assume there is a double standard? I only buy fruits and vegetables from a CSA.
And I am not "ranting". Just making a point. The fact that standards are improving, somewhat, for Chinese laborers and factory workers, and for their human rights (free speech, etc) a little bit, doesn't mean that thing are peachy there.
http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2010/04/15/240915/Microsoft-supplier-in-China-has-39sweatshop-conditions39.htm
A Microsoft supplier in China is forcing teenagers to work 15-hour shifts in "sweatshop conditions", according to a report by the National Labor Committee (NLC).
A three-year investigation of the KYE factory in Dongguan, China, produced pictures of exhausted teenagers "seen slumping over asleep on their assembly line during break time". Microsoft says it has launched an investigation into the conditions.
The factory employs up to 1,000 students aged around 16 or 17 who work 15-hour shifts, six or seven days a week. They make webcams, mice and other computer peripherals for Microsoft and other US companies.
The factory pays workers 65 cents an hour, which falls to 52 cents an hour after deductions for factory food. They work between 68 and 80 hours a week. The NLC says management controls "every second" of the workers' lives, and the pace is gruelling, with a mandatory target of producing 2,000 mice per shift.
Anonymous wrote:
The factory pays workers 65 cents an hour, which falls to 52 cents an hour after deductions for factory food. They work between 68 and 80 hours a week. The NLC says management controls "every second" of the workers' lives, and the pace is gruelling, with a mandatory target of producing 2,000 mice per shift.
Nearly 5,500 walked off their jobs at the Pingdingshan Cotton Textile Co. here recently, demanding better pay and working conditions.
By anyone’s measure they had cause: most work for 65 cents per hour.
Suddenly, strikes are surging across China as poorly paid workers — the engine of China’s economic miracle — are demanding a bigger share of the enormous wealth the country is earning from its booming export-driven economy.
The strikes — many not reported inside China on orders from the central government — threaten to cripple an economy that has enjoyed double-digit growth for years.
The government wants to keep a lid on them.
Last week much of the country’s attention focused on a strike at a Japanese-owned Honda factory in southern China — for which Chinese authorities allowed rare and open reporting. Workers there won a 24 per cent pay hike.
Authorities also allowed reporting on the Taiwanese-owned Foxconn electronic assembly plant, where a scourge of suicides by workers corralled in regimented factories rocked the nation.
Foxconn responded with a 30 per cent wage increase – and announced a further 70 per cent Monday.
But few in China heard about the clash in Pingdingshan — or more than 15 other strikes that spilled into the streets of China in May.
While it was fine for Chinese media to report on strikes at large, foreign-owned factories — the government suppressed news about worker actions at other, Chinese-owned and operated plants. It didn’t want the contagion to spread to other pools of cheap labour across China.
And few are as cheap as those in Pingdingshan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The alvery analogy I used was not meant to impy that I thought Chinese workers were slaves.
It was just an analogy to indicate that even though the workers might say things are better than they were before, that doesn't mean much if "before" was really crappy, and now is just a little bit crappy.
Do you buy fruit and vegetables at the grocery story? Most of those who work on these US farms are migrant workers, some children as young as 6 yrs old picking berries, but I'm willing to bet you buy and consume blueberries, etc. Why aren't you ranting against child labor and the conditions of migrant parents living in shacks?
Too many PP's with a double standard on this thread.
A Microsoft supplier in China is forcing teenagers to work 15-hour shifts in "sweatshop conditions", according to a report by the National Labor Committee (NLC).
A three-year investigation of the KYE factory in Dongguan, China, produced pictures of exhausted teenagers "seen slumping over asleep on their assembly line during break time". Microsoft says it has launched an investigation into the conditions.
The factory employs up to 1,000 students aged around 16 or 17 who work 15-hour shifts, six or seven days a week. They make webcams, mice and other computer peripherals for Microsoft and other US companies.
The factory pays workers 65 cents an hour, which falls to 52 cents an hour after deductions for factory food. They work between 68 and 80 hours a week. The NLC says management controls "every second" of the workers' lives, and the pace is gruelling, with a mandatory target of producing 2,000 mice per shift.
Anonymous wrote:The alvery analogy I used was not meant to impy that I thought Chinese workers were slaves.
It was just an analogy to indicate that even though the workers might say things are better than they were before, that doesn't mean much if "before" was really crappy, and now is just a little bit crappy.
Anonymous wrote:PP that is not a great analogy. A slave gets nothing but gried from slavery. The Chinese that you're talking about want to feed their families. But, I agree, better working conditions are a must.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
You make it sound like these factories are inflicted on them. In fact, they are the source of China's growth and the rising incomes in it. I think there is a misperception here. Yes, they get paid less than us but they are doing much better than under the old economy. Most of China was living in poverty, and these factory jobs give them a pretty good quality of life. They are sending money back home, buying houses. Wages and working conditions are going up.
http://www.oregonlive.com/business/index.ssf/2010/03/chinese_factory_workers_cash_i.html
Um, where to begin. Yes, the factories with their pollution are inflicted on the poorest of the Chinese. To say that they are doing better than under their old economy is debatable. More income but also much more pollution, pollution and toxins that we in the US don't want to deal with.
The deveoped world is sending out work to China to be manufactured there, because it is cheaper because in China there aren't nearly as many environmental regulations to worry about.
We are taking advantage of them, and it is mostly the ruling elite in China that is getting the benefit of this arrangement -- not the rank and file workers. Sure, hey get some more money, but they get a LOT of pollution.
That's not fair.
Anonymous wrote:
Make your own apple sauce and apple juice, it's easy, I do it all the time. It is a global economy and most of America's manufacturing jobs are out-sourced. What do you buy that is made in the USA? Many of the parts for American automobiles are made in Mexico. Toyota has become more of an American product made in the US than GM. Ford, whatever. If you don't want to shop at Wal-Mart, fine, but stop acting as though this is because you want to buy American products, manufactured by American companies that are hiring American citizens because this is not the case.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
How many of the products on the shelves of WalMart are manufactured in the US versus in China?
PP again -- I found the answer -- it's something like 70%!!!
I don't have anything against China or the Chinese, but I can't help feeling like we are taking advantage of their lax environmental regulations, and their poor employment conditions, to get our stuff at a very cheap (to us) cost.
THe fact that if you ask the Chinese rank and file workers, they seem to like this situation, isn't exactly relevant.
If you had a slave and beat him to work 18 hours a day... then gave him better working conditions and said he only had to work 12 hours a day, he'd say he was doing better, wouldn't he? So you could say it was an improvement over the former situation -- but it still wouldn't make it right to benefit from slavery.