Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re the Wisco booster, there’s never enough elite schools until Wisconsin makes in on there……

In all seriousness, Wisco is in fact a shitty school and has always been that way.

T25 cut off for elite status, that includes Cal, UCLA, Michigan, UNC, UVA in that order

Go blue baby

UNC isn't T25

Heck, I'd put them up there. They were 22 in USNWR last year.

And speaking of, looking at this year's rank, were I UNC I'd feel pretty insulted being tied with USC.

US News talk is so...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you’re the Wisco booster, there’s never enough elite schools until Wisconsin makes in on there……

In all seriousness, Wisco is in fact a shitty school and has always been that way.

T25 cut off for elite status, that includes Cal, UCLA, Michigan, UNC, UVA in that order

Go blue baby

UNC isn't T25

Heck, I'd put them up there. They were 22 in USNWR last year.

And speaking of, looking at this year's rank, were I UNC I'd feel pretty insulted being tied with USC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michigan isn't elite. A vast a majority of its students have low SAT scores. Good, but not elite. Let's be real.

This is not factually true.

https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/MedianSAT/Control/Public/

1435 with a greater share submitting than UVA. Test scores are high at Michigan.

Yes it is true. 25% of all Michigan freshmen scored BELOW[u] 1350. What's worse ONLY 52% submitted an SAT score!

Source direct from Michigan:
https://obp.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubdata/cds/CDS_2023-24_UMAA_10-25-24.pdf

No, 25% of all Michigan freshman did not score below 1350. You aren’t factoring in the 18% that submitted the ACT.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michigan isn't elite. A vast a majority of its students have low SAT scores. Good, but not elite. Let's be real.

This is not factually true.

https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/MedianSAT/Control/Public/

1435 with a greater share submitting than UVA. Test scores are high at Michigan.

Yes it is true. 25% of all Michigan freshmen scored BELOW[u] 1350. What's worse ONLY 52% submitted an SAT score!

Source direct from Michigan:
https://obp.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubdata/cds/CDS_2023-24_UMAA_10-25-24.pdf

Do you…do you think that 25% is “a vast majority?” I would hate to see your SAT scores.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michigan isn't elite. A vast a majority of its students have low SAT scores. Good, but not elite. Let's be real.

This is not factually true.

https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/MedianSAT/Control/Public/

1435 with a greater share submitting than UVA. Test scores are high at Michigan.

Yes it is true. 25% of all Michigan freshmen scored BELOW[u] 1350. What's worse ONLY 52% submitted an SAT score!

Source direct from Michigan:
https://obp.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubdata/cds/CDS_2023-24_UMAA_10-25-24.pdf

...?
70% submitted test scores which is higher than at UVA.

Also, maybe hurting my point, I'll point out the fact that no one really knows what % of Michigan freshmen scored below a 1350 because 30% are test optional. So you saying "25% of all Michigan freshmen scored BELOW 1350" is probably incorrect.

I guess I'm just saying Michigan's stats are not substantively different from those of competitive privates or UVA, so there's really no cause to dunk on it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michigan isn't elite. A vast a majority of its students have low SAT scores. Good, but not elite. Let's be real.

This is not factually true.

https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/MedianSAT/Control/Public/

1435 with a greater share submitting than UVA. Test scores are high at Michigan.

Yes it is true. 25% of all Michigan freshmen scored BELOW[u] 1350. What's worse ONLY 52% submitted an SAT score!

Source direct from Michigan:
https://obp.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubdata/cds/CDS_2023-24_UMAA_10-25-24.pdf

That is not a high score. UVA's lower 25% is signifcantly higher. Face it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michigan isn't elite. A vast a majority of its students have low SAT scores. Good, but not elite. Let's be real.

This is not factually true.

https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/MedianSAT/Control/Public/

1435 with a greater share submitting than UVA. Test scores are high at Michigan.

Yes it is true. 25% of all Michigan freshmen scored BELOW[u] 1350. What's worse ONLY 52% submitted an SAT score!

Source direct from Michigan:
https://obp.umich.edu/wp-content/uploads/pubdata/cds/CDS_2023-24_UMAA_10-25-24.pdf

13

HYPSM and Caltech

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michigan isn't elite. A vast a majority of its students have low SAT scores. Good, but not elite. Let's be real.

This is not factually true.

https://www.collegeraptor.com/college-rankings/details/MedianSAT/Control/Public/

1435 with a greater share submitting than UVA. Test scores are high at Michigan.

Anonymous wrote:Michigan isn't elite. A vast a majority of its students have low SAT scores. Good, but not elite. Let's be real.

This is not factually true.

Unemployment can lead to catastrophic mental issues. OP pls take care

Anonymous wrote:I think your family needs to get a better hobby

+100

I made this song to describe Wisconsin/Florida/UGa boosters
https://youtu.be/jGQ4nT3_SiY?si=DVZsHaj8irKd_GiS

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Michigan is right up there with UCLA academically. Berkeley is in its own niche.

If we’re going off of elite graduate schools, then 1 and 5 tenure track faculty at R1s come from the following schools

1. Stanford 2. Cal 3. Wisconsin 4. Harvard 5. Michigan

As a said, go blue baby

Dude screw you, you just unintentionally helped the wisco booster. It should be the imperative of all Michigan alumni to suppress that statistic from being reiterated. If Wisconsin gets “discovered”, then it hurts Michigan’s ability to attract students.