Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Devil’s advocate: why not have a kid, since he is willing, and see how it goes?
He might do a 180 and fall in love when the kid is born. I did that (as a woman). I was ambivalent before and planned one mostly because due to social convention.
Or if he’s terrible, well at least you’ll get custody and some spousal support, which is better than doing it alone.
Don't be a crappy parent who willing brings a child into this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that no one has focused on OPS language: “I couldn’t have been clearer and he agreed.” Note that she doesn’t say “and he said he wanted them too.“
Not so sure he “changed his mind.”
Who gives a shit? She’s 31 and can still have kids elsewhere!!! Run OP!!
I am not saying she should or shouldn’t. What I am saying is that it’s not necessarily fair to blame the guy. It sounds like OP went into the marriage with a lot of wishful thinking.
Who cares about blame. She is on the tail end of fertility and he is playing games and wasting her time.
But because she's on the tail end of fertility, she needs to accept the real possibility that she won't have a child if she leaves him either.
Huh? 31 is not the tail end of fertility. She has plenty of time, and suggesting she stay and actively have children with someone who specifically said they didn't want them is NOT a good plan.
1 year divorce, 3 years to find someone, 1 year to get married, 2 years of marriage before having kids.
That's 37 years. Kids at 38 years old is how you end up with kids with ASD or Downs.
You are an idiot.
+1. That poster might be 60+. I am 47. Many people I know had their first kids 40-42. All the kids are fine. I had an accident baby from sex one time at 34 and then again at 37 (yes, I was married...). People have kids all the time at 38-44 and not problems people assume. Ridiculous.
Your anecdote does not change the data about the increased risks of having kids at advanced maternal age.
It is not an anecdote. Maybe you should start reading. The fertility cliff at 35 is a myth. Numerous articles have been written about it. Most new moms here are mid to late 30s.
https://rightasrain.uwmedicine.org/well/health/fertility-myths-debunked
https://slate.com/technology/2020/08/fertility-cliff-advanced-maternal-age-outdated.html
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2021/apr/10/fertility-cliff-age-35-week-in-patriarchy
https://www.womenshealthmag.com/uk/collective/long-reads/a44642061/does-your-fertility-really-fall-off-a-cliff-when-you-hit-35/
there are literally hundreds of articles about this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So what if there is an increase of .5 to 1 percent at 40 of a chromosonal abnormality? That is hardly an increase overall. You need to understand math better. There is nothing scary about these charts at all. Women have been having kids into their late 30s and early 40s for 100s of years.
The OP literally has 10 years before she needs to freak out.
Anonymous wrote:There is no way he changed his mind in 8 months which means he was lying to you all along and trapped you into marriage.
Divorce. This is a big thing to lie about on his part. It’s only been 8 months, it and run. Do not have kids with this guy thinking he’ll change his mind when he sees how cute they are or sees himself in them.
Anonymous wrote:Devil’s advocate: why not have a kid, since he is willing, and see how it goes?
He might do a 180 and fall in love when the kid is born. I did that (as a woman). I was ambivalent before and planned one mostly because due to social convention.
Or if he’s terrible, well at least you’ll get custody and some spousal support, which is better than doing it alone.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
So what if there is an increase of .5 to 1 percent at 40 of a chromosonal abnormality? That is hardly an increase overall. You need to understand math better. There is nothing scary about these charts at all. Women have been having kids into their late 30s and early 40s for 100s of years.
The OP literally has 10 years before she needs to freak out.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Interesting that no one has focused on OPS language: “I couldn’t have been clearer and he agreed.” Note that she doesn’t say “and he said he wanted them too.“
Not so sure he “changed his mind.”
Who gives a shit? She’s 31 and can still have kids elsewhere!!! Run OP!!
I am not saying she should or shouldn’t. What I am saying is that it’s not necessarily fair to blame the guy. It sounds like OP went into the marriage with a lot of wishful thinking.
Who cares about blame. She is on the tail end of fertility and he is playing games and wasting her time.
But because she's on the tail end of fertility, she needs to accept the real possibility that she won't have a child if she leaves him either.
Huh? 31 is not the tail end of fertility. She has plenty of time, and suggesting she stay and actively have children with someone who specifically said they didn't want them is NOT a good plan.
1 year divorce, 3 years to find someone, 1 year to get married, 2 years of marriage before having kids.
That's 37 years. Kids at 38 years old is how you end up with kids with ASD or Downs.
You are an idiot.
+1. That poster might be 60+. I am 47. Many people I know had their first kids 40-42. All the kids are fine. I had an accident baby from sex one time at 34 and then again at 37 (yes, I was married...). People have kids all the time at 38-44 and not problems people assume. Ridiculous.
Your anecdote does not change the data about the increased risks of having kids at advanced maternal age.
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:OP ignore the people talking about how you're so old. Many of us had kids in mid/late 30s and beyond. You would need to date intentionally if you want to find a serious relationship and marriage again soon, but it's very likely to work out.
And bluntly I see no downside to leaving. Worst case OP doesn't get married in time and doesn't have kids. Well this dud of a DH doesn't want them anyway. I would personally never get over my resentment of having been lied to and the person denying me something so important (which is different from infertility etc). I wouldn't want to live with such a person and waste my life.