If you're not just bloviating, identify the specific NU programs that are stronger than their UCLA and Michigan counterparts. I'll spot you journalism, but what else do you have? Seriously, I'll wait. NU's strengths around radio/film/TV/theatre fall short of UCLA's. Its engineering can't touch Michigan's. Across the pure academic departments, NU's faculty is no stronger than either UCLA's or Michigan's. Some kids benefit more from a smaller environment, for sure, but that's a question of fit, not of quality.Anonymous wrote:Nope, vast majority of NU programs are better. It's a T10 school. UCLA and Michigan are not T10 material. It's also a 6-7K undergrad and private school. So obviously different than a massive state school in what it can offer.Anonymous wrote:It's not. Some of its programs are great, others are merely very good--just like UCLA and Michigan.Anonymous wrote:Good list. But you need to break out the Tier 1. NU is way above UCLA and UMIch. It's in a category by itself for academics when compared to BIG10 schoolsAnonymous wrote:It's a great conference. No schools in it that aren't at least really solid. For overall academic quality, I'd tier it out like this:
Tier 1: NU, UCLA, UMich
Tier 2: Wisconsin, Washington, USC
Tier 3: Illinois, Maryland, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Minnesota, Rutgers
Tier 4: IU, Michigan State
Tier 5: Iowa, Oregon, Nebraska
Obviously, there's a lot of variability across programs. The schools I put in Tier 3, for example, all have specific programs that clearly are first-tier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NW
UCLA
Michigan
USC
Wisconsin/UIUC
Washington/Rutgers/UMD
Ohio State/Penn State/Purdue/Minn
Indiana/MSU/Iowa
Nebraska
You forgot Oregon
I wonder whether Oregon dominating the Big Ten will make more kids interested in applying?
Maybe for kids who make "football" a consideration in their college choices. But most academic kids don't do that. Sure, they may want school spirit, but it's not a top consideration. They can get that at the better Big10 schools and still have a great football team
Quack quack
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NW
UCLA
Michigan
USC
Wisconsin/UIUC
Washington/Rutgers/UMD
Ohio State/Penn State/Purdue/Minn
Indiana/MSU/Iowa
Nebraska
You forgot Oregon
I wonder whether Oregon dominating the Big Ten will make more kids interested in applying?
Quack quack
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:NW
UCLA
Michigan
USC
Wisconsin/UIUC
Washington/Rutgers/UMD
Ohio State/Penn State/Purdue/Minn
Indiana/MSU/Iowa
Nebraska
You forgot Oregon
I wonder whether Oregon dominating the Big Ten will make more kids interested in applying?
Anonymous wrote:It's not. Some of its programs are great, others are merely very good--just like UCLA and Michigan.Anonymous wrote:Good list. But you need to break out the Tier 1. NU is way above UCLA and UMIch. It's in a category by itself for academics when compared to BIG10 schoolsAnonymous wrote:It's a great conference. No schools in it that aren't at least really solid. For overall academic quality, I'd tier it out like this:
Tier 1: NU, UCLA, UMich
Tier 2: Wisconsin, Washington, USC
Tier 3: Illinois, Maryland, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Minnesota, Rutgers
Tier 4: IU, Michigan State
Tier 5: Iowa, Oregon, Nebraska
Obviously, there's a lot of variability across programs. The schools I put in Tier 3, for example, all have specific programs that clearly are first-tier.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's a great conference. No schools in it that aren't at least really solid. For overall academic quality, I'd tier it out like this:
Tier 1: NU, UCLA, UMich
Tier 2: Wisconsin, Washington, USC
Tier 3: Illinois, Maryland, Ohio State, Penn State, Purdue, Minnesota, Rutgers
Tier 4: IU, Michigan State
Tier 5: Iowa, Oregon, Nebraska
Obviously, there's a lot of variability across programs. The schools I put in Tier 3, for example, all have specific programs that clearly are first-tier.
Tier 1 NU
Tier 2 UCLA Mich USC
Tier 3 Washington Wisconsin
Everything else follows
Anonymous wrote:USC is Syracuse with better weather.Anonymous wrote:UCLA and USC underrated in this thread, Wisconsin vastly overrated.
USC is Syracuse with better weather.Anonymous wrote:UCLA and USC underrated in this thread, Wisconsin vastly overrated.
Anonymous wrote:Where’s Minnesota??
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if you go by lacrosse and other sports:
Johns Hopkins
NU
Michigan
Ucla
Usc
illinois
umd
the rest
Johns Hopkins is not better than Northwestern. And it's not really in the Big Ten.
It is by virtual of being a part of the academic alliance through its Lacrosse program.
It’s not though. Chicago (which was an OG Big Ten school) is part of the Big Ten Academic Alliance but Hopkins is not.
Chicago was a charter member of the big 10 and dropped its sports participation decades ago.
Chicago is no longer part of the Big Ten Academic Alliance.
Northwestern is a cut aboveAnonymous wrote:The whole conference is “standard strong.” To borrow a phrase from admissions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:if you go by lacrosse and other sports:
Johns Hopkins
NU
Michigan
Ucla
Usc
illinois
umd
the rest
Johns Hopkins is not better than Northwestern. And it's not really in the Big Ten.
It is by virtual of being a part of the academic alliance through its Lacrosse program.
It’s not though. Chicago (which was an OG Big Ten school) is part of the Big Ten Academic Alliance but Hopkins is not.
Chicago was a charter member of the big 10 and dropped its sports participation decades ago.