Anonymous wrote:Vivek and Elon keep asking for resumes from the best and brightest...they are UPenn and Harvard grads who I would imagine will look to bring on lots of the Ivy and other elite school grads that the masses decry.
They are looking to cut $2 Trillion...eliminate the entire federal workforce (unlikely) and you save $300BN.
Won't the best and brightest go after all the programs that don't make any sense and will devastate all the Red areas that voted for Trump? Disability (massive fraud), Agricultural Subsidies (WSJ gave a list of agencies that should be eliminated...actually not that many, but Dept of Agriculture was high on their list), etc.
Wouldn't it be f**king hysterical if the end result of this is to eliminate farm subsidies, completely overhaul disability and medicare fraud and generally destroy all the rural areas that voted for Trump.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:yep that was my first thought too.Anonymous wrote:isn't this what GAO and OIGs do? This seems like unnecessary overlap and duplication.
GAO just issues reports. They have no bite.
I'm not sure "DOGE" will either, but we'll see.
But that is the point. Only Congress can really fix things. We already have GAO looking into this stuff, so why duplicate efforts instead of expecting Congress to do their jobs and fix things? The DOGE itself is the epitome of inefficiency.
It really is pathetic. They are forming an agency that is not actually part of the government but calls itself that, to duplicate things that actual government agencies do. And it is headed not by one person but by two, because it is so efficient.
Will my taxpayer money pay for the Doge?
Yes, they’ll likely get some inflated fee from OMB for their “consulting” services.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty simple for him to reduce the federal work force by 10% just by not recommending any annual pay increases for the next four years.
+10. Please do that.
Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty simple for him to reduce the federal work force by 10% just by not recommending any annual pay increases for the next four years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:they have no power.
I will just point and laugh. DOGE is a joke anyway.
DOGE or no DOGE they are coming for your jobs. And some of you will be unemployed. If anyone thinks this time around they will leave the federal workforce intact then you are not paying attention to their determination.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They will have the last laugh and some of you will be joining the unemployed line.
Or move on to jobs that pay better
If there are jobs that pay better for which you’re qualified, why are you in the federal government in the first place? I’m not trying to snarky- this is an honest question.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone considered that Elon will never be a part of fed gov because he'll choose not to divest, which he would have to do?
DOGE will be a nonprofit that advises the government for a fee. Its not like he needs hard data to make decisions, its just knives out?
I personally don’t like this. I believe they need to divest. It’s a conflict of interest just to advise the government at such a high level and own certain stocks. The prohibitions on stocks at my agency are high. Even my parents and children can’t own those stocks. I wish Congress were subject to such restrictions m.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone considered that Elon will never be a part of fed gov because he'll choose not to divest, which he would have to do?
DOGE will be a nonprofit that advises the government for a fee. Its not like he needs hard data to make decisions, its just knives out?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They will have the last laugh and some of you will be joining the unemployed line.
Or move on to jobs that pay better
If there are jobs that pay better for which you’re qualified, why are you in the federal government in the first place? I’m not trying to snarky- this is an honest question.
Many considerations that vary by individual. Sometimes it is a dual career decision. Sometimes it is better work-life balance. Sometimes it is the work environment has an actual HR and you can't actually do shitty things.
A lot of people are also interested in the mission.
In short, you don’t work much and you want a job that protects you while you slack off.
I welcome DOGE.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ironic they plan to decrease federal workforce by starting a new agency.
This new agency is so efficient they selected 2 people to run it!
Mush is looking for super high in individuals to donate 80-hours a week of their life to this magnificent agency.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ironic they plan to decrease federal workforce by starting a new agency.
This new agency is so efficient they selected 2 people to run it!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s pretty simple for him to reduce the federal work force by 10% just by not recommending any annual pay increases for the next four years.
Obama gave almost no raises.