Anonymous
Post 11/03/2024 00:51     Subject: Harris beating Trump in Iowa



Real world implications have an impact.
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2024 00:46     Subject: Harris beating Trump in Iowa

There’s no way Iowa is flipping blue. Democrats can keep dreaming and probably should be more worried about the NY tri state and New England as well as Virginia because the Eastern seaboard is not a lock for Kamala
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2024 00:35     Subject: Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Lots of registered Republicans in Iowa and everywhere are voting Dem!

She's got the big MO-mentum.

Keep voting ladies and keep voting non-MAGA men!
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2024 00:32     Subject: Re:Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Anonymous wrote:It’s all fake. A last minute Hail Mary.

.

Mm-hmmm. It’s so bogus that all the right wingers are screeching hysterically. It’s not working.
Anonymous
Post 11/03/2024 00:30     Subject: Re:Harris beating Trump in Iowa

The numbers don’t lie. Repubs are strong in Iowa.

Anonymous
Post 11/03/2024 00:26     Subject: Re:Harris beating Trump in Iowa

It’s all fake. A last minute Hail Mary.

Anonymous
Post 11/03/2024 00:24     Subject: Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Anonymous wrote:Please let this happen!

I'd love a President Kamala to keep calm and carry on-a-la and put an end to the drama-a-la!


Yes this would be amazing but unless we win the House and the Senate we are still screwed.

And SCOTUS can not let her win Thomas and Alito actually Toberrs too are very worried about expanding the court. Not to mention new ethics rules. We need those down ballots we need it all .

Vote ladies vote please
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2024 23:59     Subject: Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Please let this happen!

I'd love a President Kamala to keep calm and carry on-a-la and put an end to the drama-a-la!
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2024 23:52     Subject: Re:Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol if you believe this. Have you been to Iowa? I grew up there. The Democrats are dead to those people. I have family members that were Democrats for years, but are now loyal Trump supporters. No chance those people are backing Kamala Harris.


Did you see the post above yours? Ann Seltzer polls are usually very accurate.


Ok. Everyone is wrong sometimes, and here, direct experience strongly indicates this poll is very wrong. It is also an outlier among polls. For all I know, Ann Seltzer got a huge payday to sacrifice some credibility to put out good numbers for Harris. In any event, I do not believe it is accurate. This is based on the experience of having grown up there and having watched people abandon the Democrats first hand.

A Democrat got 47.5% of the vote for Iowa governor in 2018.


That’s a lot different than a national democrat. And kamala harris is a bottom of the barrel national democrat at that. No chance there has been a huge swing in her favor.


Copium


Like i said, you’re free to think whatever you want. Experience tells me you are wrong and Seltzer is wrong.


Except Seltzer has been spot on for the last 12+ years, even as she’s contrasted other polls. I tend to lean on her reliability as a good indicator of where things are vs. your gut.


That’s your choice. I believe she is wrong. I would not even be surprised to learn she got paid big money to put out a poll like this. I fully expect these types of organizations to throw out some last minute polls purporting to show that Kamala Harris is riding high as a last ditch effort to try to push her across the line. It is all BS by a very partisan set at this point.


NP. Was she wrong when she called Iowa for the obese orange man in 2016 and 2020?


She is now claiming there has been an astronomic 11 point shift leftward in one election cycle. That doesn’t happen with the political polarization in the country. Nothing in the 2022 midterms showed that Democrats were gaining ground in Iowa.


Post-Dobbs, new Democratic candidate, post J6, and voters have had 4 more years to "get to know" Donald Trump.

Plus it might not be an 11 point shift. Her margin for error is 3.4%. So it could be 5-8 point shift which is not actually weird. A lot of places saw a similar swing between Obama in 2012 and Trump in 2016.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2024 23:50     Subject: Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Fabrizio talking about 2020 as if:

(a) we didn't all watch on live TV as Trump's yahoos tried to take the capitol using force after that election, and

(b) Trump's hand-picked judges didn't overturn a fundamental right for women that had been secured in 1973 specifically to keep women from dying (as has started happening again).

We'll see what happens on Tuesday, but it's a different election than it was 4 years ago.


You act as if a) Biden and Harris didn’t go on a massive spending spree and cause prices to rise by 20%, b) Biden and Harris didn’t open up the border, inviting over 10 million illegal immigrants to come into the country.


a) inflation was an international phenomenon. If the "Biden and Harris spending spree" were the cause, then inflation would have been a lot worse in other countries than in the USA. fact is, it is the opposite. How does your false theory explain that?

b) the immigration issue requires a legislative fix. Trump had two years with a trifecta and failed to get it done. Biden and Harris have both said they would sign the Lankford bill but Trump killed it. Trump clearly has no interest in "solving" immigration other than to use immigrants as an "other" to castigate to people like you.


Sorry, inflation would have worse in the US than other countries, and the opposite is true.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2024 23:49     Subject: Re:Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol if you believe this. Have you been to Iowa? I grew up there. The Democrats are dead to those people. I have family members that were Democrats for years, but are now loyal Trump supporters. No chance those people are backing Kamala Harris.


Did you see the post above yours? Ann Seltzer polls are usually very accurate.


Ok. Everyone is wrong sometimes, and here, direct experience strongly indicates this poll is very wrong. It is also an outlier among polls. For all I know, Ann Seltzer got a huge payday to sacrifice some credibility to put out good numbers for Harris. In any event, I do not believe it is accurate. This is based on the experience of having grown up there and having watched people abandon the Democrats first hand.

A Democrat got 47.5% of the vote for Iowa governor in 2018.


That’s a lot different than a national democrat. And kamala harris is a bottom of the barrel national democrat at that. No chance there has been a huge swing in her favor.


Copium


Like i said, you’re free to think whatever you want. Experience tells me you are wrong and Seltzer is wrong.


Except Seltzer has been spot on for the last 12+ years, even as she’s contrasted other polls. I tend to lean on her reliability as a good indicator of where things are vs. your gut.


That’s your choice. I believe she is wrong. I would not even be surprised to learn she got paid big money to put out a poll like this. I fully expect these types of organizations to throw out some last minute polls purporting to show that Kamala Harris is riding high as a last ditch effort to try to push her across the line. It is all BS by a very partisan set at this point.


NP. Was she wrong when she called Iowa for the obese orange man in 2016 and 2020?


She is now claiming there has been an astronomic 11 point shift leftward in one election cycle. That doesn’t happen with the political polarization in the country. Nothing in the 2022 midterms showed that Democrats were gaining ground in Iowa.


Dobbs.
Trump and his tariffs were an absolute disaster for farmers and required a Dem bailout to the tune of billions of dollars.
Trump's garbage mouth doesn't go over well with decent people. Iowans are decent people.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2024 23:48     Subject: Re:Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol if you believe this. Have you been to Iowa? I grew up there. The Democrats are dead to those people. I have family members that were Democrats for years, but are now loyal Trump supporters. No chance those people are backing Kamala Harris.


Did you see the post above yours? Ann Seltzer polls are usually very accurate.


Ok. Everyone is wrong sometimes, and here, direct experience strongly indicates this poll is very wrong. It is also an outlier among polls. For all I know, Ann Seltzer got a huge payday to sacrifice some credibility to put out good numbers for Harris. In any event, I do not believe it is accurate. This is based on the experience of having grown up there and having watched people abandon the Democrats first hand.

A Democrat got 47.5% of the vote for Iowa governor in 2018.


That’s a lot different than a national democrat. And kamala harris is a bottom of the barrel national democrat at that. No chance there has been a huge swing in her favor.


Copium


Like i said, you’re free to think whatever you want. Experience tells me you are wrong and Seltzer is wrong.


Except Seltzer has been spot on for the last 12+ years, even as she’s contrasted other polls. I tend to lean on her reliability as a good indicator of where things are vs. your gut.


That’s your choice. I believe she is wrong. I would not even be surprised to learn she got paid big money to put out a poll like this. I fully expect these types of organizations to throw out some last minute polls purporting to show that Kamala Harris is riding high as a last ditch effort to try to push her across the line. It is all BS by a very partisan set at this point.


NP. Was she wrong when she called Iowa for the obese orange man in 2016 and 2020?


She is now claiming there has been an astronomic 11 point shift leftward in one election cycle. That doesn’t happen with the political polarization in the country. Nothing in the 2022 midterms showed that Democrats were gaining ground in Iowa.


The orange man wasn’t running in 2022.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2024 23:47     Subject: Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Fabrizio talking about 2020 as if:

(a) we didn't all watch on live TV as Trump's yahoos tried to take the capitol using force after that election, and

(b) Trump's hand-picked judges didn't overturn a fundamental right for women that had been secured in 1973 specifically to keep women from dying (as has started happening again).

We'll see what happens on Tuesday, but it's a different election than it was 4 years ago.


You act as if a) Biden and Harris didn’t go on a massive spending spree and cause prices to rise by 20%, b) Biden and Harris didn’t open up the border, inviting over 10 million illegal immigrants to come into the country.


a) inflation was an international phenomenon. If the "Biden and Harris spending spree" were the cause, then inflation would have been a lot worse in other countries than in the USA. fact is, it is the opposite. How does your false theory explain that?

b) the immigration issue requires a legislative fix. Trump had two years with a trifecta and failed to get it done. Biden and Harris have both said they would sign the Lankford bill but Trump killed it. Trump clearly has no interest in "solving" immigration other than to use immigrants as an "other" to castigate to people like you.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2024 23:47     Subject: Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Fabrizio talking about 2020 as if:

(a) we didn't all watch on live TV as Trump's yahoos tried to take the capitol using force after that election, and

(b) Trump's hand-picked judges didn't overturn a fundamental right for women that had been secured in 1973 specifically to keep women from dying (as has started happening again).

We'll see what happens on Tuesday, but it's a different election than it was 4 years ago.


You act as if a) Biden and Harris didn’t go on a massive spending spree and cause prices to rise by 20%, b) Biden and Harris didn’t open up the border, inviting over 10 million illegal immigrants to come into the country.


Do the MAGAs have any factual arguments? The inflation we’ve had is a direct result of Trump’s policies which would only get worse under another Trump term. Biden has actually turned the economy around and inflation is quite low this year. And Trump killed the first bipartisan border bill that could’ve actually done something. But, no, continue to blame Biden and Harris.

A lot of Republicans see the light on this. Sorry you haven’t.
Anonymous
Post 11/02/2024 23:46     Subject: Re:Harris beating Trump in Iowa

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Lol if you believe this. Have you been to Iowa? I grew up there. The Democrats are dead to those people. I have family members that were Democrats for years, but are now loyal Trump supporters. No chance those people are backing Kamala Harris.


Did you see the post above yours? Ann Seltzer polls are usually very accurate.


Ok. Everyone is wrong sometimes, and here, direct experience strongly indicates this poll is very wrong. It is also an outlier among polls. For all I know, Ann Seltzer got a huge payday to sacrifice some credibility to put out good numbers for Harris. In any event, I do not believe it is accurate. This is based on the experience of having grown up there and having watched people abandon the Democrats first hand.

A Democrat got 47.5% of the vote for Iowa governor in 2018.


That’s a lot different than a national democrat. And kamala harris is a bottom of the barrel national democrat at that. No chance there has been a huge swing in her favor.


Copium


Like i said, you’re free to think whatever you want. Experience tells me you are wrong and Seltzer is wrong.


Except Seltzer has been spot on for the last 12+ years, even as she’s contrasted other polls. I tend to lean on her reliability as a good indicator of where things are vs. your gut.


That’s your choice. I believe she is wrong. I would not even be surprised to learn she got paid big money to put out a poll like this. I fully expect these types of organizations to throw out some last minute polls purporting to show that Kamala Harris is riding high as a last ditch effort to try to push her across the line. It is all BS by a very partisan set at this point.


NP. Was she wrong when she called Iowa for the obese orange man in 2016 and 2020?


She is now claiming there has been an astronomic 11 point shift leftward in one election cycle. That doesn’t happen with the political polarization in the country. Nothing in the 2022 midterms showed that Democrats were gaining ground in Iowa.