Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harris got a ton of death threats in 2019-2020 in the run up to the election. It was terrible. Not surprised she bought a gun.
Any evidence the FBI actually investigated any of those tons of Kamala death threats?
And any arrests made?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Harris got a ton of death threats in 2019-2020 in the run up to the election. It was terrible. Not surprised she bought a gun.
Any evidence the FBI actually investigated any of those tons of Kamala death threats?
Anonymous wrote:Harris got a ton of death threats in 2019-2020 in the run up to the election. It was terrible. Not surprised she bought a gun.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).
Staff now saying she was just joking.
Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….
If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.
How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.
Because she simultaneously calls for mandatory gun buybacks, i. e. confiscation, because gun violence is such a serious issue and at the same time she’s laughing about how she has a gun and she’ll just shoot someone ha ha ha, then says she’s just joking. Is gun violence serious, or not? That’s the double standard. Gun violence is serious when she wants to take guns away, but it’s a joke when she’s talking about using her own.
You mean the buybacks of assault rifles she mentioned? Are you really not smart enough to know the difference between assault weapons with high capacity mags meant for combat and traditional guns people keep in their homes for protection or deer hunting? Seriously? Are people this stupid? No wonder we've reach an impasse when trying to keep military rifles out of the hands of nut jobs. There are just too many nut job idiots among us.
Or it’s an effort to muddy the waters and depress votes among those who want reasonable gun control. Problem with an anonymous forum like this one is that you can’t tell the difference. The one thing I’m sure of is that we’d be foolish to assume everyone on here is a genuine good-faith voter.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).
Staff now saying she was just joking.
Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….
If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.
How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.
Because she simultaneously calls for mandatory gun buybacks, i. e. confiscation, because gun violence is such a serious issue and at the same time she’s laughing about how she has a gun and she’ll just shoot someone ha ha ha, then says she’s just joking. Is gun violence serious, or not? That’s the double standard. Gun violence is serious when she wants to take guns away, but it’s a joke when she’s talking about using her own.
You mean the buybacks of assault rifles she mentioned? Are you really not smart enough to know the difference between assault weapons with high capacity mags meant for combat and traditional guns people keep in their homes for protection or deer hunting? Seriously? Are people this stupid? No wonder we've reach an impasse when trying to keep military rifles out of the hands of nut jobs. There are just too many nut job idiots among us.
Anonymous wrote:This is so incredibly stupid of her.
Doesn’t she understand, during a break in, the gun will just get taken away from her and used against her?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:She said she would let her staff “clean it up” 9instead of owning her statement while she’s saying it).
Staff now saying she was just joking.
Guess you thought it was a serious issue. Not to her! She’ll just commit gun violence. Hahaha….
If it weren't for double standards, democrats would have no standards at all.
How and in what context is this a double standard situation? Harris has a pistol that serves the purpose of securing her homestead in the event of an unwelcome intruder. No one should have a problem with this. If you have a problem with that, perhaps it's you harboring the double standard.
Because she simultaneously calls for mandatory gun buybacks, i. e. confiscation, because gun violence is such a serious issue and at the same time she’s laughing about how she has a gun and she’ll just shoot someone ha ha ha, then says she’s just joking. Is gun violence serious, or not? That’s the double standard. Gun violence is serious when she wants to take guns away, but it’s a joke when she’s talking about using her own.
Anonymous wrote:I put so much efforts in fighting against the gun in US. She is a huge disapoitmetn and despite my plans to vote for her, I am skipping this election all together. I believed her when she campaigned against the guns in 2019, and now she turned around to please some voters. She is stupid to realize that she lost more votes than she gained: gun fans are not going to believe her and people who are anti-guns are just going to turn their backs on her.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Adding: and for the most part, “citizens” typically don’t have access to “military rifles, which at this point almost universally are capable of fully automatic fire.
If you aren't smart enough to understand the difference between a traditional shotgun or revolver and an assault rifle that can take out 30 people in 45 seconds, you should probably refrain from commenting. Idiot